You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: The door DOES appear to have been kicked in! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-16-07 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. The door DOES appear to have been kicked in!
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-ps...

3rd paragraph from the bottom

"Pictures of the door released by the Sheriff's Office show it was dented in several areas, that the doorframe gave way, splintering the door trim and dislodging the strike plate."

Sounds like kicked in to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Teen shot under 'home as castle' law Herman Munster  Feb-14-07 06:42 PM   #0 
  - Just what should the man have done  dsc   Feb-14-07 06:44 PM   #1 
  - You are correct about that  Jacobin   Feb-14-07 06:45 PM   #2 
  - I would agree from what was presented in the article  rinsd   Feb-14-07 06:50 PM   #6 
  - A few years ago in delray, some jerk did that.  Edweird   Feb-14-07 06:58 PM   #9 
  - Agreed. People should have the right to protect themselves  Katherine Brengle   Feb-16-07 01:38 PM   #57 
     - Maybe all his friends will also learn an object lesson here, and  kestrel91316   Feb-16-07 02:52 PM   #89 
        - Absolutely.  Katherine Brengle   Feb-16-07 03:14 PM   #101 
  - A 6' 215 lber breaking into one's house sounds like a reasonable fear of imminent peril  LeftyMom   Feb-14-07 06:45 PM   #3 
  - He didn't just "break in" he kicked the door in. I'da shot him, too.  Edweird   Feb-14-07 06:47 PM   #4 
  - Ricardo needs a bigger gun.  karlrschneider   Feb-14-07 06:49 PM   #5 
  - teehee  rinsd   Feb-14-07 06:52 PM   #8 
  - Hell, I would have shot him under those conditions. Breaking...  Poll_Blind   Feb-14-07 06:50 PM   #7 
  - Sounds perfectly justified to me.  dicksteele   Feb-14-07 07:08 PM   #10 
  - That's a textbook case of self-defense...  benEzra   Feb-15-07 06:46 PM   #11 
  - That kid just learned a lesson most of us never need to be taught:  piedmont   Feb-15-07 07:04 PM   #12 
  - If this kid broke into my house  distantearlywarning   Feb-15-07 07:51 PM   #13 
  - Broke into my house like this, he'd be dead.  Zynx   Feb-16-07 03:02 PM   #97 
  - Violent criminal gets shot invading home? good shoot.  aikoaiko   Feb-15-07 08:08 PM   #14 
  - Here in Colorado, they want to expand this to . . .  donco6   Feb-15-07 09:03 PM   #15 
  - You mean like in California?  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:28 PM   #77 
     - Here in LA I always heard you better be damned sure the guy is armed,  kestrel91316   Feb-16-07 02:54 PM   #91 
     - Hence the popularity of inexpensive switchblades and handguns  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:57 PM   #93 
     - you know that is not true, and yet you keep saying it  iverglas   Feb-16-07 03:07 PM   #99 
  - 'Roid Rage n/t  gbrooks   Feb-15-07 09:20 PM   #16 
  - That's the same here in Mississippi. If you're attacking my home or family, the law here says...  Selatius   Feb-15-07 09:25 PM   #17 
  - Same with California if entry was forceful and unauthorized  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:40 PM   #85 
  - yes, it's days like this when I am happy to love DU  iverglas   Feb-15-07 09:26 PM   #18 
  - Every minor dispute?  scrinmaster   Feb-16-07 11:32 AM   #21 
  - facts are fun  iverglas   Feb-16-07 12:37 PM   #25 
     - We are all prone to reacting immediately.  redqueen   Feb-16-07 12:45 PM   #28 
  - You’re welcome to use your verbal skills  Mugu   Feb-16-07 12:32 PM   #22 
  - What exactly would YOU have done?  Edweird   Feb-16-07 12:34 PM   #23 
  - Hmm. Maybe find out the facts before opening my mouth.  iverglas   Feb-16-07 12:39 PM   #26 
     - I'm pretty confident about the facts!  Edweird   Feb-16-07 12:45 PM   #29 
  - Because anyone who believes in self defense and gun rights is a right wing nutjob.  mainegreen   Feb-16-07 12:36 PM   #24 
  - okey dokey  iverglas   Feb-16-07 12:40 PM   #27 
  - If the door was kicked in, the law applies.  piedmont   Feb-16-07 01:24 PM   #51 
  - Bingo, I'd say  iverglas   Feb-16-07 01:36 PM   #55 
     - ...  piedmont   Feb-16-07 01:48 PM   #64 
  - So, do you actually believe the shooter was WRONG and the  kestrel91316   Feb-16-07 03:02 PM   #96 
  - I don't actually believe ANYTHING  iverglas   Feb-16-07 03:12 PM   #100 
  - self deleted  MilesColtrane   Feb-16-07 03:28 PM   #105 
  - I wonder if that covers 9 year olds  gorbal   Feb-15-07 09:39 PM   #19 
  - Yeah, but you weren't a 215 lb wrestler, kicking peoples  scrinmaster   Feb-16-07 11:28 AM   #20 
     - There doesn't appear to have been any kicking in of doors. n/t  redqueen   Feb-16-07 12:46 PM   #30 
     - True  gorbal   Feb-16-07 01:19 PM   #49 
        - the rules would have applied to you, for sure  iverglas   Feb-16-07 01:45 PM   #60 
  - The door doesn't appear to have been kicked in...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 12:48 PM   #31 
  - How do you figure that?  Edweird   Feb-16-07 12:50 PM   #32 
     - Hmmmmm... interesting...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 12:57 PM   #34 
     - Even your article supports kicked in door  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:05 PM   #38 
        - Read the next paragraph after that...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:07 PM   #40 
           - It's reasonable to believe that if police photos were taken, they were taken shortly..  MilesColtrane   Feb-16-07 03:45 PM   #108 
              - Perhaps...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 04:04 PM   #114 
     - the Sun Sentinal gets my vote  iverglas   Feb-16-07 12:58 PM   #35 
        - It's weird... the article reporting there was no damage  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:09 PM   #42 
        - the article claiming no damage is pretty vague about where that claim  fishwax   Feb-16-07 02:06 PM   #71 
           - Yup... there's just too much information missing...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 02:22 PM   #74 
           - what on earth is so difficult about this  iverglas   Feb-16-07 02:31 PM   #79 
           - Again, the earlier report has no agent, nor the circumstances of inspection  fishwax   Feb-16-07 02:58 PM   #94 
           - We're going to have to trust police and prosecutors to be better observers of fact  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:38 PM   #83 
              - I see the reporter as having a vested interest in making it as "controversial" as possible.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 02:54 PM   #92 
        - Why would you be disgusted with the shooting when you  aikoaiko   Feb-16-07 01:14 PM   #44 
           - Because violence is disgusting?  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:17 PM   #47 
              - I don't find people defending themselves to be disgusting acts.  aikoaiko   Feb-16-07 01:23 PM   #50 
                 - No, it is necessary...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:45 PM   #61 
                    - I would be greatly distressed about taking another’s life,  Mugu   Feb-16-07 02:42 PM   #86 
  - So this "kid" thinks he has the right to defend his girlfriend  Cerridwen   Feb-16-07 12:52 PM   #33 
  - The door DOES appear to have been kicked in!  Edweird   Feb-16-07 12:58 PM   #36 
  - I think we heard you the first time  iverglas   Feb-16-07 01:05 PM   #37 
     - Where is this conflicting news report?  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:06 PM   #39 
        - You already have it... read the whole thing. n/t  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:08 PM   #41 
           - I did. It shows the kid kicked the door in. That's why he is in JAIL.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:14 PM   #45 
              - It doesn't show that, it says it.  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:16 PM   #46 
                 - According to who? The reporter? The homeowner let the reporter in to look?  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:18 PM   #48 
                 - for pity's sake  iverglas   Feb-16-07 01:29 PM   #53 
                 - Exactly. The door was kicked IN not OUT. The damage will be on the inside.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:47 PM   #63 
                    - lord bleeding jezus  iverglas   Feb-16-07 02:02 PM   #70 
                       - Thanks for the reference...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 02:25 PM   #75 
                       - just disgusted old biddies, us  iverglas   Feb-16-07 02:36 PM   #82 
                          - Exactly...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 02:40 PM   #84 
                       - I agree, the incident in Boca was wrong.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 02:36 PM   #81 
                          - "admitting"??  iverglas   Feb-16-07 02:50 PM   #87 
                             - Where do you get that the police report "quotes the homeowner"  Edweird   Feb-16-07 02:59 PM   #95 
                             - where are you getting that I SAID  iverglas   Feb-16-07 03:23 PM   #102 
                                - sorry, bad post. too much caffeine.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 03:24 PM   #104 
                             - Ah, do I see? ........  Edweird   Feb-16-07 03:23 PM   #103 
                             - Well, you know something?  iverglas   Feb-16-07 03:44 PM   #107 
                                - Truce.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 03:56 PM   #112 
                                - Interesting point about being invested...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 04:39 PM   #117 
                             - hey, you and I have been at this for 2 hours.... I call a truce  Edweird   Feb-16-07 03:30 PM   #106 
                                - not in Florida you won't!  iverglas   Feb-16-07 03:47 PM   #110 
                                   - I'm sorry about your father.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 03:54 PM   #111 
                 - Heh...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:44 PM   #59 
                    - hey, I'm no fan of the police. Just being able to defend myself.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:50 PM   #67 
                       - ... and I completely understand that.  redqueen   Feb-16-07 02:08 PM   #72 
                 - Well, a compromised front door is something you'd want to repair-- FAST  piedmont   Feb-16-07 03:46 PM   #109 
                    - True...  redqueen   Feb-16-07 04:12 PM   #115 
                       - Yeah, so far it's all a bunch of speculation.  piedmont   Feb-16-07 04:24 PM   #116 
  - This is a clear self-defense shooting.  meldroc   Feb-16-07 01:11 PM   #43 
  - why anybody would choose to live in florida is beyond me...  QuestionAll   Feb-16-07 01:26 PM   #52 
  - Warm weather.Girls in bikinis most of the year. No state income tax.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:37 PM   #56 
  - "warm" weather...?  QuestionAll   Feb-16-07 01:49 PM   #66 
     - I moved here nearly 20 years ago.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 01:52 PM   #68 
        - for truly gorgeous weather and women in bikinis- but with more progressive attitudes-  QuestionAll   Feb-16-07 01:57 PM   #69 
           - well, I drove here with a buddy of mine. Kinda settled here by accident.  Edweird   Feb-16-07 02:19 PM   #73 
  - Why anyone would forcefully break into someone's home is beyond me  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:30 PM   #78 
     - yup.  QuestionAll   Feb-16-07 02:50 PM   #88 
  - Okay  Little Wing   Feb-16-07 01:29 PM   #54 
  - They're using this case to justify the new law, but it'd be permissible under the OLD law.  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Feb-16-07 01:43 PM   #58 
  - Did you see this?  redqueen   Feb-16-07 01:46 PM   #62 
  - You're right, what's the "castle law" needed for if it's self defense?  treestar   Feb-16-07 01:49 PM   #65 
     - The "new" laws, like most laws, are being passed for mostly political reasons  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:31 PM   #80 
        - well hey  iverglas   Feb-16-07 02:52 PM   #90 
  - From the information provided, that would have been a "good shoot" in California  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 02:25 PM   #76 
  - I'm more concerned about a young man who thinks that's appropriate...  Hobarticus   Feb-16-07 03:07 PM   #98 
     - Good point about anger management  slackmaster   Feb-16-07 04:01 PM   #113 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC