You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: "or for administration officials"------this means the WH wants immunity for itself? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-20-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. "or for administration officials"------this means the WH wants immunity for itself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Are we being played? NYT: "Wiretapping Compromise Was Months in the Making" babylonsister  Oct-20-07 09:27 AM   #0 
  - Sold out by a Congress that doesn't understand subpoena power.  aquart   Oct-20-07 09:29 AM   #1 
  - You know, I'm having a very hard time with the Democratic party  Mutineer   Oct-20-07 09:34 AM   #2 
  - Feingold and WYDEN ---and Nelson FL voted NO to immunity provision:  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:58 AM   #13 
     - but in the end, Nelson said AYE!  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 11:03 AM   #29 
  - They understand, they just don't want to rock the money boat:  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 09:35 AM   #4 
  - Being allowed to see secret documents is some kind of big reward?  wienerdoggie   Oct-20-07 09:35 AM   #3 
  - I am so totally disillusioned and disgusted, I -could-spit. nt  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 09:48 AM   #6 
     - i am taking deep breaths as my BP tends to rise.  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:26 AM   #23 
  - White House Spy Docs Show Surveillance Was Illegal, Senator Feingold Charges  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:47 AM   #5 
  - Let's not forget who's money put BUSH and the Rs in there.  L. Coyote   Oct-20-07 10:29 AM   #25 
     - Telephone Utilities PAC Contributions to Federal Candidates, 2005-2006 = $5.2M  L. Coyote   Oct-20-07 10:38 AM   #27 
  - this is the same Jay Rockerfeller is has not done anything related to Phase II.  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:51 AM   #7 
  - And now we know why; he's part of the problem imo, despite his faux  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 09:52 AM   #8 
     - He is to willing to 'make nice"  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:56 AM   #11 
  - ACLU:--Congress, ,,, bowed to the fearmongering of the administration, yet agai  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:54 AM   #9 
  - "the administration has largely shunned leaders in the House, Democrats there say":  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:55 AM   #10 
  - According to this, they didn't 'bow' to anything. It was a 'done deal'  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 10:01 AM   #17 
  - REC  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 09:57 AM   #12 
  - God, I don't WANT to believe that, but the circumstantial evidence is mounting  tom_paine   Oct-20-07 09:59 AM   #14 
  - And here many of us thought it was all about them being  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 10:05 AM   #20 
     - Disappointed is too tepid a word. This may be the greatest mass deriliction  tom_paine   Oct-20-07 10:29 AM   #24 
     - well I realized it a long tme ago  leftchick   Oct-20-07 10:32 AM   #26 
  - Jay Rockefeller received $25,000 from Verizon employees since 06. Call him & ask 'was that bribery'.  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:00 AM   #15 
  - Check this out:  babylonsister   Oct-20-07 10:03 AM   #19 
     - The Telecoms hedged their bets in 2006-guessed the Dems would win and started  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:25 AM   #22 
  - Jay Rockefeller received $25,000 from Verizon employees since 06. Call him & ask 'was that bribery'.  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:01 AM   #16 
  - ACLU Disappointed in Intel Committee FISA Vote, Wyden/Feingold Amendments Slightly Improve Bad Bill  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:02 AM   #18 
     - "or for administration officials"------this means the WH wants immunity for itself?  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 12:37 PM   #33 
  - The White House negotiated the bill primarily through Christopher S. Bond of Missouri,  rodeodance   Oct-20-07 10:14 AM   #21 
  - But now that it's in the public domain, maybe they'll change their minds  The Backlash Cometh   Oct-20-07 10:47 AM   #28 
     - We need to SLAM Rockefeller with phone calls come Monday.  loudsue   Oct-20-07 11:22 AM   #30 
        - Historically, the reason why you couldn't take Democrats down when  The Backlash Cometh   Oct-20-07 11:58 AM   #31 
           - Prolly a good guess, Backlash.  loudsue   Oct-20-07 12:10 PM   #32 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC