robinlynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-17-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 34. oh, it's been around for around a hundred years. |
| -Does sitting on the board of a large, multinational corporation make you a "corporatist"? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
That is a trick question. Gore is on several boards, and he is not a corporatist. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:02 PM |
#1 |
 -
Trick question how? |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:17 PM |
#5 |
| -
I did. because you can't answer yes or no to this question. you're wrong either way. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:19 PM |
#7 |
 -
It's a yes or no question |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:21 PM |
#9 |
| -
He sits on the board of many. apple is one. I dont think it is a yes or a no question. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:25 PM |
#13 |
| -
Ok I'll make this a little bit more simple: |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:28 PM |
#14 |
| -
I answered at the same time. What I think is there. I think it's more subtle than yes or no. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:31 PM |
#18 |
| -
All poodles are dogs. All dogs aren't poodles. n/t |
madeline_con |
Oct-17-07 09:46 PM |
#49 |
| -
theoretically yes, (it does make one a corporatist), and most people who sit on boards are, |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:29 PM |
#15 |
| -
There's no logic to your argument.. |
Virginia Dare |
Oct-17-07 07:18 PM |
#37 |
| -
Perhaps in that it has different answers depending on one's own agenda. |
TwilightZone |
Oct-17-07 06:20 PM |
#8 |
| -
Heh heh By George I think you've got it |
durrrty libby |
Oct-17-07 06:22 PM |
#11 |
| -
Gore is a corporatist |
JackRiddler |
Oct-17-07 10:32 PM |
#51 |
| -
not necessarily, no. |
ulysses |
Oct-17-07 06:03 PM |
#2 |
| -
oprah is a corporatist, is she on any boreds...ooops boards nt |
msongs |
Oct-17-07 06:05 PM |
#3 |
| -
she owns several companies, so yes. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:32 PM |
#19 |
| -
Most are, but people like Al Gore & Oprah Winfrey are not. nt |
TheGoldenRule |
Oct-17-07 06:06 PM |
#4 |
| -
What makes them different? |
durrrty libby |
Oct-17-07 06:21 PM |
#10 |
| -
I think I know: |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:24 PM |
#12 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-07 06:30 PM |
#17 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-07 09:38 PM |
#46 |
| -
And the message is hypocrisy |
durrrty libby |
Oct-17-07 10:06 PM |
#50 |
| -
where the hell did that come froM? |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:32 PM |
#20 |
| -
I see. It was a trick question, as I thought. but I didn't even guess it was to provoke another |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:34 PM |
#21 |
| -
No, it truly was not meant to be a "trick" |
Lirwin2 |
Oct-17-07 06:41 PM |
#23 |
| -
sick of the hillary fight. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:59 PM |
#27 |
| -
I understand that you were sincere. When people call her a corporatist it has |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:01 PM |
#30 |
| -
It's only a "trick" if it exposes your double standard. |
mondo joe |
Oct-17-07 06:49 PM |
#25 |
| -
what? |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 06:58 PM |
#26 |
| -
That dude is stirring the pot and is personally attacking me now in 2 threads. |
TheGoldenRule |
Oct-17-07 09:40 PM |
#47 |
| -
Here's your answer: Neither Oprah or Gore are oppressing people or polluting to make money. nt |
TheGoldenRule |
Oct-17-07 09:43 PM |
#48 |
| -
Who is Hillary polluting to make money? |
durrrty libby |
Oct-17-07 10:36 PM |
#52 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-18-07 02:00 AM |
#53 |
| -
How sad...Attacks and lies equal knowledge? |
durrrty libby |
Oct-18-07 06:05 AM |
#54 |
| -
Yes they are big bad evil devil corporists too. Booga Booga |
durrrty libby |
Oct-18-07 09:58 AM |
#55 |
| -
Curious results thus far. I would have thought that the consensus was "Yes" |
TwilightZone |
Oct-17-07 06:17 PM |
#6 |
| -
I think the fact that she took money from pharmaceutical and HMOs is much more important. Because |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:10 PM |
#33 |
| -
What on earth is a "corporatist"? |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Oct-17-07 06:29 PM |
#16 |
| -
a "corporatist" ( according to DU) is something evil therefore it is Hillary Clinton |
durrrty libby |
Oct-17-07 06:35 PM |
#22 |
| -
Wikipedia has an entry. |
SimpleTrend |
Oct-17-07 06:47 PM |
#24 |
| -
a corporatist is a person who believes more in the welfare and needs of large corporations |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:05 PM |
#31 |
| -
Here's a good explanation of corporatism.. |
Virginia Dare |
Oct-17-07 07:21 PM |
#38 |
| -
very interesting, but the opposite of what it means today. The word and concept may |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:27 PM |
#39 |
| -
I think what people here who use the word "corporatist".. |
Virginia Dare |
Oct-17-07 07:30 PM |
#40 |
| -
could be that corporativism is the concept you posted, basted on cooperation |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:36 PM |
#41 |
| -
My guess is that most of the people using it |
pnwmom |
Oct-17-07 07:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
oh, it's been around for around a hundred years. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:12 PM |
#34 |
| -
My greatgrandfather used it a lot. (the word) and strikes and unions were born. |
robinlynne |
Oct-17-07 07:15 PM |
#35 |
| -
Lots of words have been around for hundreds of years |
pnwmom |
Oct-17-07 08:18 PM |
#42 |
| -
"Corporatist" really has nothing to do with business model corporations.. |
Virginia Dare |
Oct-17-07 07:15 PM |
#36 |
| -
Anti-Clinton people |
pnwmom |
Oct-17-07 08:20 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sitting on the board and profiting from it like Mrs. Hillary makes you |
UGADUer |
Oct-17-07 07:01 PM |
#28 |
| -
The answer is no. Why? |
Selatius |
Oct-17-07 07:01 PM |
#29 |
| -
One argument for "Yes". Why? |
SimpleTrend |
Oct-18-07 01:34 PM |
#56 |
| -
No. Pushing the agenda of corporate donors at the expense of the general populace does. |
Mister Ed |
Oct-17-07 08:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
No, but accepting corporate money, and then pushing that corporation's pet projects |
MadHound |
Oct-17-07 09:02 PM |
#45 |
| -
No, because it heavily depends on what you DO on such board. -nt |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Oct-18-07 01:35 PM |
#57 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread