| 70. ooh..ooh....can I play? |
|
Where would Evan Bayh be without Birch Bayh? Where would Mary Landrieu be without Moon Landrieu? Where would Jay Rockefeller be without John D. Rockefeller III (and a host of other Rockefellers)? Where would Teddy Kennedy be without JFK and RFK? WHere would Jesse Jackson Jr. be without Jesse Sr? Where would Russ Carnahan be without Jean and Mel Carnahan?
|
| -Where Would Ms. Clinton Be Without Bill?? |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 09:39 AM |
#0 |
-
sexist dribble.... and i'm not even a HRC supporter |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 09:43 AM |
#1 |
 -
Exactly |
Annces |
Oct-16-07 09:49 AM |
#8 |
 -
As one who has been involved in |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:03 AM |
#29 |
  -
that's a form of militant feminism, I can do without |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:07 AM |
#33 |
   -
That's not what I said, but of course, |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:19 AM |
#44 |
  -
That's not true |
cuke |
Oct-16-07 12:56 PM |
#147 |
  -
Cuke, you are obviously quite accurate... |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 03:46 PM |
#155 |
  -
She was "awarded" a Senate seat? What do you get out of insulting the Demoratic |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:10 AM |
#36 |
   -
Yes, my dear, awarded. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:22 AM |
#50 |
    -
No, you have no respect for Democrats. You've insulted an entire state of NY Dems. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:24 AM |
#54 |
     -
I've stated my position quite clearly. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:32 AM |
#73 |
    -
Yes, you've made your disdain for the Democratic base quite clear. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:35 AM |
#80 |
    -
Again, incorrect. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:37 AM |
#86 |
    -
Now that Democratic party of NY state are "sheep posing as people"? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:42 AM |
#93 |
    -
No, the Democratic Party of NY state |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:46 AM |
#101 |
    -
The Dem party of NY state is comprised of people - Democrats. You know, the people |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:49 AM |
#105 |
    -
That's not what you said. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:52 AM |
#110 |
    -
Terminology? That ought to be good. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:52 AM |
#111 |
    -
"The Machine" |
Ewellian |
Oct-16-07 04:00 PM |
#157 |
   -
Oh, don't be silly. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 04:23 PM |
#159 |
   -
As a New Yorker , I have to say that the party in this state is pathetic |
hedgehog |
Oct-16-07 02:15 PM |
#151 |
  -
Too funny. We're radical feminists?!? |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:17 AM |
#42 |
   -
Per post 31, you aren't a feminist BECAUSE you married |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:23 AM |
#53 |
    -
That wasn't the point. It's USING the position of the spouse in the marriage for career benefit. n/t |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:30 AM |
#65 |
   -
SO, she was supposed to divorce Bill before she ran? |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:40 AM |
#90 |
   -
No, she was supposed to accomplish her success |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:49 AM |
#106 |
   -
She had a life and career before she married.. |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:55 AM |
#115 |
   -
Me. A radical feminist. |
Le Taz Hot |
Oct-16-07 10:43 AM |
#96 |
   -
you are through the looking glass |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-16-07 08:38 PM |
#196 |
  -
Accomplished NOTHING on her own....Really! |
Lochloosa |
Oct-16-07 12:54 PM |
#146 |
  -
How does Hillary set women's rights back by about 50 years? |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 08:36 PM |
#195 |
 -
BS!! If the shoe was on the other foot we'd be saying the same thing. |
Dawgs |
Oct-16-07 10:10 AM |
#37 |
  -
As a matter of fact you are wrong. I don't pre-judge |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:15 AM |
#39 |
 -
Either you're on the bus or you're off the bus |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:27 AM |
#58 |
 -
Not sexist dribble -- I'll take a shot at it |
Yupster |
Oct-16-07 10:37 AM |
#85 |
  -
It wasn't Joan Collins BTW.It was Joan ("don't f88ck with me fellas" ) Crawford and it was Pepsi. |
saracat |
Oct-16-07 01:55 PM |
#150 |
 -
Amen to that... |
youthere |
Oct-16-07 10:56 AM |
#119 |
 -
Beg your pardon? I believe the correct word is "drivel" for "dribble" is reserved for sippy cups? |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 12:36 PM |
#143 |
-
yes without bill she would NEVER have gotten that ivy league education |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-16-07 09:44 AM |
#2 |
 -
I believe she has her upper class parents to thank for that |
proud2Blib |
Oct-16-07 10:04 AM |
#31 |
-
Upper class parents????? |
Frances |
Oct-16-07 10:16 AM |
#41 |
-
Yes, parents and relatives who freely promoted "the lie" that Hillary was named after the |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:21 AM |
#46 |
-
Her father was a business owner and she grew up in |
proud2Blib |
Oct-16-07 10:25 AM |
#55 |
-
She has said that her parents paid her college tuition, but she had to pay for all extras |
ElizabethDC |
Oct-16-07 10:50 AM |
#107 |
 -
Don't you see? Anyone whose parents helped pay for college has no quaification to |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:54 AM |
#113 |
-
I was referring to Hillary's mother |
Frances |
Oct-16-07 11:35 AM |
#135 |
-
And I was referring to her parents |
proud2Blib |
Oct-16-07 02:56 PM |
#152 |
-
Why not ask: Where would Bill be without Hillary? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 09:46 AM |
#3 |
 -
Not a Hillary supporter and I agree 100% |
YOY |
Oct-16-07 09:56 AM |
#14 |
 -
Exactly!!! I'm sure she advised and supported him every step of the way! nt |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Oct-16-07 10:31 AM |
#68 |
 -
I agree |
Frances |
Oct-16-07 11:37 AM |
#136 |
 -
thank you, that is the better question, in my opinion n/t |
Scout |
Oct-16-07 12:29 PM |
#141 |
-
Yes, but |
Ricki |
Oct-16-07 09:47 AM |
#4 |
-
Without Hillary, someone else would be #42. nt |
Deep13 |
Oct-16-07 09:48 AM |
#5 |
-
It's SEXIST to point out nepotism (when it benefits a woman) |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 09:49 AM |
#6 |
 -
Nepotism? Try to learn what words mean before you use them, please. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 09:49 AM |
#9 |
  -
You obviously weren't an English major! |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 09:54 AM |
#12 |
   -
Has Bil appointed her President? |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 09:58 AM |
#16 |
    -
Bill appointed her to cabinet level duties during his presidency, yes... |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:00 AM |
#23 |
     -
which has to do with her election in ny how? |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-16-07 10:02 AM |
#25 |
      -
She was given the support of the party based on her family ties, that's how. nt |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:04 AM |
#30 |
     -
We would want to remember that because? |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:29 AM |
#64 |
    -
Because it's an example of nepotism. I'm sorry that it's a painful memory...nt |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:35 AM |
#81 |
    -
No but the media has |
proud2Blib |
Oct-16-07 10:48 AM |
#102 |
   -
And you're saying the electorate of NY elected her because of kinship? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 09:58 AM |
#17 |
    -
Yep. That's exactly what I'm saying. In addition, she got the funding |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:01 AM |
#24 |
   -
Wow, such little respect for the Democratic party. Is that you Bill O'Reilly? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:03 AM |
#27 |
   -
LOL. Having lost the "dictionary wars", Mondo Joe turns to "with us or against us!" |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:05 AM |
#32 |
   -
I'm pretty sure you're the only poster here who believes |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 10:20 AM |
#45 |
   -
That's usually what the "dictionary wars" are about. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:21 AM |
#49 |
   -
No, it's quite apparent HRC was promoted partially through "nepotism" |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:33 AM |
#74 |
   -
this would be true if bill clinton appointed her president, or someone appointed her president |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-16-07 09:58 AM |
#19 |
    -
No. Nepotism applies to jobs and privileges that fall short of the Presidency |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:03 AM |
#26 |
   -
Are you thinking rationally? |
Frances |
Oct-16-07 10:21 AM |
#47 |
    -
You're right. * and HRC are the two most qualified individuals to be President |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:25 AM |
#56 |
   -
That you compare HRC with Bush* in terms of qualfications... |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:37 AM |
#83 |
   -
Both benefit from famous families. Sorry that this (accurate) comparison makes you uncomfortable... |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:39 AM |
#87 |
   -
And by that "logic" then no one from a family history of privilege |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 10:46 AM |
#100 |
   -
What a bizarre logic. We must ignore nepotism lest a qualified candidate slip through our fingers. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:50 AM |
#109 |
   -
Can you possibly keep to the argument at hand |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 11:01 AM |
#121 |
   -
No, I said both * and HRC benefit from nepotism |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 11:07 AM |
#124 |
   -
She's already won the primary,too? |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 10:28 AM |
#61 |
   -
Sophistry! |
Truth Hurts A Lot |
Oct-16-07 10:50 AM |
#108 |
  -
*favoritism* (as in appointment to a job) based on kinship |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:55 AM |
#116 |
  -
I agree with the nepotism label - HRC got involved in the daily operations which is profoundly |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:28 AM |
#59 |
 -
The fact that you agree with it just confirms how wrong it must be. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:28 AM |
#62 |
 -
Awe, I value your opinion too MJ. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:35 AM |
#79 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-16-07 09:50 AM |
#10 |
-
bullshit |
ccpup |
Oct-16-07 09:49 AM |
#7 |
 -
exactly, without her man she is nothing. |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-16-07 09:51 AM |
#11 |
-
Doesn't it just make you wanna smack the crap out of something? |
Marrah_G |
Oct-16-07 09:59 AM |
# |
-
i generally want to smack the crap out of stupid people. i think bigots are stupid. |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-16-07 10:03 AM |
#28 |
-
She might still be Senator Clinton |
Warpy |
Oct-16-07 09:54 AM |
#13 |
 -
Have you read her book? |
juajen |
Oct-16-07 01:29 PM |
#148 |
-
Hello? Who said he'd even be Prez without her? |
Lex |
Oct-16-07 09:56 AM |
#15 |
 -
True if only for the fact that Wifey was ACTIVELY cleaning up his sexual misconduct with his aides. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:22 AM |
#51 |
-
" . . . Wifey . . . ?" |
Lex |
Oct-16-07 10:32 AM |
#69 |
-
Psst! I did that tongue-in-cheek because I knew it would get somebody's goat. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:43 AM |
#95 |
-
So clever. |
Lex |
Oct-16-07 11:06 AM |
#123 |
-
Awe, sure that silly term "wifey" is permanently part of my regular-use vocabulary. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 11:09 AM |
#126 |
-
She'd be nothing? |
Marrah_G |
Oct-16-07 09:58 AM |
#18 |
 -
After all, she's just a woman. It's not as if she has an education or career or aspirations |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:00 AM |
#22 |
-
It is definitely that |
Marrah_G |
Oct-16-07 10:13 AM |
#38 |
-
An Old Joke |
Sparkly |
Oct-16-07 09:59 AM |
#20 |
-
She's referred to as Sen. Clinton now. |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 09:59 AM |
#21 |
-
Well put narrative! IMO, HRC is an Anti-Feminist from the entitled ranks of political royalty. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:08 AM |
#34 |
 -
Yep. And you're a SEXIST for pointing that out. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:15 AM |
#40 |
-
Without Bill, she'd be married to an ex-President, a NY Senator, and |
Egalitariat |
Oct-16-07 10:10 AM |
#35 |
-
bullshit. utter bullshit. and sexist as it's being pointed out. |
kineta |
Oct-16-07 10:18 AM |
#43 |
 -
A little reading material. HRC seems to think being first lady is a qualification |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:21 AM |
#48 |
-
You linked to her biography. What's she supposed to do - leave a blank decade |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:23 AM |
# |
-
So her status as Bill's wife is |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:32 AM |
#71 |
-
No, you're not following, but I'll help you. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:34 AM |
#77 |
 -
The Goldwater Girl |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:37 AM |
#84 |
  -
"Qualified to be president"? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:48 AM |
#103 |
 -
No one said she'd be "nowhere" without Bill; she just wouldn't be the heir apparent |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:41 AM |
#91 |
-
I think you've got it! |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:40 AM |
#89 |
-
Hey, let's open the floodgates? Us gals can post "married to the boss" on all future resumes. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:45 AM |
#99 |
-
I'll be gentle as I can: If you start a sentence with "us" gals can... |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 06:16 PM |
#160 |
-
how about the reverse? Where would Bill have been without HRC? |
book_worm |
Oct-16-07 10:23 AM |
#52 |
 -
I can only say I am who I am and where I am in part because of my relationship |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:27 AM |
#57 |
-
Ok I sort of understand your point |
never_get_over_it |
Oct-16-07 10:28 AM |
#60 |
-
Ridiclous. Anyone who looks at her biography |
OKNancy |
Oct-16-07 10:29 AM |
#63 |
 -
Lots of women teach law and work in politics |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:32 AM |
#72 |
 -
You left out that stint |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:33 AM |
#76 |
 -
"she would have made a huge impact" but not in politics - she hasn't the personality. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:52 AM |
#112 |
-
Where would Bill have been without Hilary? |
LeftCoast |
Oct-16-07 10:30 AM |
#66 |
-
George * Bush got where he is because he was the MOST QUALIFIED |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:30 AM |
#67 |
-
ooh..ooh....can I play? |
onenote |
Oct-16-07 10:32 AM |
#70 |
 -
Where would George W. Bush be without Karl Rove? |
Sparkly |
Oct-16-07 10:33 AM |
#75 |
  -
W. Bush would be President without a famous dad! Realy he would! |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:43 AM |
#94 |
 -
Or W without HW? |
spotbird |
Oct-16-07 10:34 AM |
#78 |
 -
Yes, I find political royal dynasties very distasteful too. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 10:54 AM |
#114 |
-
Guess I Did Not See That Coming |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 10:36 AM |
#82 |
 -
You're still wrong. Part of the reason he was President was because of HER. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 10:39 AM |
#88 |
  -
Well....Let's Compare Them Then? |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 11:03 AM |
#122 |
 -
I don't know where you keep getting "the right" from. The people have the right to |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 11:12 AM |
#128 |
 -
The American People Have No Choice Unfortunately |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 11:28 AM |
#133 |
 -
If you think most Americans are so much more stupid than you, Democracy must be a |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 11:31 AM |
#134 |
 -
Would you have voted against Robert Kennedy ,were his |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 10:44 AM |
#98 |
 -
Again you miss the point. She was a highly accomplished person in her own right |
book_worm |
Oct-16-07 10:57 AM |
#120 |
  -
So Fricking What? |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 11:07 AM |
#125 |
 -
Nothing gives anyone the right to become president, other than winning more electoral |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 11:10 AM |
#127 |
 -
"entitlement of becoming President" |
sufrommich |
Oct-16-07 11:16 AM |
#129 |
  -
Tenuous? |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 11:24 AM |
#131 |
 -
No, I fear that the M$M will turn medieval on her ass - the moment after HRC accepts the nomination. |
ShortnFiery |
Oct-16-07 12:29 PM |
#140 |
 -
Melinda Gates WAS in a management position at Microsoft before marrying Bill Gates |
kineta |
Oct-16-07 12:43 PM |
#144 |
 -
The moment you felt the need to refer to her as "Ms. Clinton" |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 11:24 AM |
#132 |
  -
And You Refer To Her As HRC |
OrangeCountyDemocrat |
Oct-16-07 11:55 AM |
#137 |
 -
Using initials is gender neutral.. |
hlthe2b |
Oct-16-07 12:19 PM |
#138 |
 -
That's interesting. |
juajen |
Oct-16-07 01:50 PM |
#149 |
-
The same place Junior would be without Poppy. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-16-07 10:41 AM |
#92 |
 -
Yeppers. Of course you're a SEXIST for pointing that out. :sarcasm: nt |
Romulox |
Oct-16-07 10:44 AM |
#97 |
  -
In the same way I'm anti-semitic for not liking Lieberman. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-16-07 10:48 AM |
#104 |
 -
At least she was accepted into law school, unlike Junior |
herbster |
Oct-16-07 03:56 PM |
#156 |
-
Bill does seem to be her winning formula,everyone in voice chat talks of Bill back in the WH. |
cooolandrew |
Oct-16-07 10:55 AM |
#117 |
-
You might ask the same question about Al Gore, or any other VP |
Elspeth |
Oct-16-07 10:56 AM |
#118 |
-
Glad to see others called you on the sexism here. |
lwfern |
Oct-16-07 11:16 AM |
#130 |
-
IMHO... |
hughee99 |
Oct-16-07 12:28 PM |
#139 |
-
Maybe the real question should be, "Where would 'Mr. Clinton' be without Hillary?" |
Iris |
Oct-16-07 12:30 PM |
#142 |
-
I suppose a question just as valid would be... |
LanternWaste |
Oct-16-07 12:50 PM |
#145 |
-
Exactly, she married well |
Generator |
Oct-16-07 03:28 PM |
#153 |
 -
She was a success on her own before Bill got into politics. Could you at least get your |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 07:11 PM |
#163 |
  -
She was a successful elected politician before marriage????? |
Generator |
Oct-16-07 07:59 PM |
#179 |
 -
She didn't marry into politics - she worked in a partnership that led to success |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 08:16 PM |
#186 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-07 07:35 PM |
#168 |
-
Well the first thing I noticed was her dropping the *Rodham* in her name...now |
Imagevision |
Oct-16-07 03:38 PM |
#154 |
 -
Hillary Rodham would probably have been a successful |
Disturbed |
Oct-16-07 04:13 PM |
#158 |
-
I'm starting to get the impression that some folks just aren't totally behind Hillary. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-16-07 06:18 PM |
#161 |
-
In Arkansas where she belongs. |
MLFerrell |
Oct-16-07 07:09 PM |
#162 |
 -
Why would she be in Arkansas? She's not FROM there. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 07:12 PM |
#164 |
-
I didn't say she was from there, I said she belongs there. |
MLFerrell |
Oct-16-07 07:26 PM |
#165 |
-
Why would she be there without Bill? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 07:27 PM |
#166 |
-
Do you expect a logical answer? |
Katherine Brengle |
Oct-16-07 07:36 PM |
#169 |
-
No, but I have a hard time giving up on logic even where it probably can't be found. |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 07:42 PM |
#170 |
-
Indeed, fair enough. |
Katherine Brengle |
Oct-16-07 07:46 PM |
#171 |
-
Where would HE be without HER? |
Katherine Brengle |
Oct-16-07 07:32 PM |
#167 |
-
A functionary within the Republican Party. eom. |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 07:47 PM |
#172 |
 -
Why would that be? Or do you just like to post bullshit with no link to reality |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 07:48 PM |
#173 |
-
She worked for Barry Goldwater's campaign and was president of the Young Repubs |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 07:50 PM |
#174 |
-
And she was a goldwater girl, too... |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 07:52 PM |
#176 |
-
I think Bill pulled her into the Democrats; she's always been very conservative |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 07:54 PM |
#177 |
-
Oh, so you're making assumptions about what you think was in her head... |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 08:03 PM |
#180 |
 -
I can't know what she thinks inside any more than you |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 08:06 PM |
#181 |
-
Actually, it was the Vietnam war and the death of MLK that did it... |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 08:21 PM |
#189 |
-
I read about her opinion on Vietnam in her book |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 08:25 PM |
#191 |
-
Well you're wrong . She became a Democrat before she MET Bill Clinton. But why bother |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 08:09 PM |
#182 |
-
I didn't make anything up; I'm just stating what I believe |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 08:11 PM |
#183 |
-
Yes, you are totally making shit up - like when you say Bill "pulled" her into the |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 08:12 PM |
#184 |
-
You don't think she's accomplished all she has on her own merit? |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 07:50 PM |
#175 |
 -
She's done almost nothing as Senator before running for President |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 07:56 PM |
#178 |
-
How do you define nothing? |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 08:24 PM |
#190 |
-
Approval ratings dont mean much in American politics |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 08:32 PM |
#192 |
-
Votes do and she was re-elected for more than just her husband's name n/t |
cynatnite |
Oct-16-07 08:34 PM |
#193 |
-
She outspent Jonathan Tasini 100:1 and was a former first lady |
UGADUer |
Oct-16-07 08:34 PM |
#194 |
-
I'm really stunned at how uninformed some people in this thread are |
wlucinda |
Oct-16-07 08:15 PM |
#185 |
 -
Is anyone suggesting she would accomplish nothing? |
Yupster |
Oct-17-07 09:38 AM |
#198 |
-
Yes. Several, including the OP. |
wlucinda |
Oct-17-07 02:44 PM |
#199 |
-
Where would Mr. Obama be without Michelle? |
Evergreen Emerald |
Oct-16-07 08:17 PM |
#187 |
 -
And where would Ted Kennedy be without JFK? |
mondo joe |
Oct-16-07 08:19 PM |
#188 |
-
Anyone with their eyes opens knows where she would be or... |
superkia |
Oct-16-07 10:20 PM |
#197 |