You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #143: "States like Wisconsin are awash in water" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
malakai2 Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #89
143. "States like Wisconsin are awash in water"
Little nuggets like that (see also, "water delivery" and "water production"), viewed through the prism of the chronic water shortages in southwestern states, lead people to believe that he has designs on transporting water from those states that are "awash" to those states that aren't. And what then? Every time we remove a ceiling on growth in an area, growth resumes until it hits a new ceiling...so where will New Mexico be in a few decades when, after they've broken through a previous ceiling and become thoroughly dependent on someone else's water, that someone else suddenly has none to spare? Disaster, more than likely, and on multiple scales. Why create a population dependent on a long supply chain for an item as essential as water, when it would be much simpler and vastly more cost effective to just encourage those folks to settle where the water already is?

If he wants a workable solution, as workable as possible while maintaining the status quo to the extent possible, then we can start by revisiting the water pacts between the southwestern states to more accurately reflect climate realities, criminalizing waste of the water he covets on such things as fountains and lawns and golf courses, and using water shortages as a much greater disincentive to population growth in arid states. Agricultural water rights laws and customs are doing us no favors, are they too much of a sacred cow to expect revisions? How about halting depletion of aquifers down there...those might be more important as emergency drought mitigation sources (to say nothing of their ecological value) than as lockboxes to be raided anytime a governor wants to avoid asking people to make an unpopular sacrifice.

If he would confine his statements to things like water conservation, water reuse, and water availability as a limiting factor for regional population size, he'd probably get far less immediate resistance from people in the Great Lakes region. People in the southwest might bristle at the idea of a cap on water availability, but then again most reasonable people associate terrestrial deserts with a shortage of water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC