You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: Now, now. They've already decided what we want to see and hear... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Now, now. They've already decided what we want to see and hear...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Should "celebrity news" be banned from the cable news channels? Joanne98  Oct-11-07 10:46 AM   #0 
  - Who would you suggest inact and inforce such a ban?  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 10:47 AM   #1 
  - The FCC who else.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:48 AM   #3 
     - What control does the FCC have over  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 10:52 AM   #8 
     - The OP wants a new law giving them that power  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 10:55 AM   #13 
        - such a law  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 10:57 AM   #21 
        - The OP has a dream of the government locking up reporters for what they say  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 10:59 AM   # 
           - Britney pundits aren't reporters.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:01 AM   #30 
              - Do you imagine there's  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:05 AM   #34 
              - So reporters are only reports if they cover stories you approve of?  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:06 AM   #36 
              - Britney isn't news and if u cover her you're not a reporter! IMO!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:07 AM   #40 
                 - Here is the clue you seem to be missing  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:11 AM   #45 
                    - Oh! So u think Britney Spheres going to court IS news!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:15 AM   #53 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-11-07 11:19 AM   #57 
                          - zzzzzzzzzzzz  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:35 AM   #66 
              - Absolutely not! These stations should show some intentions to serve the common good, or get out.  Judi Lynn   Oct-11-07 11:45 AM   #76 
        - So u think Britney should be the only news we get?  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:06 AM   #38 
           - You shouldn't be surprised  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:11 AM   #44 
           - Okay! How about using the anti-trust laws. The media companies are to big.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:17 AM   #56 
              - How about  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:24 AM   #63 
           - You said we needed a bill and that the FCC should enforce it. "who else" as you said  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 11:12 AM   #47 
           - I can't remember the last time the FCC put anyone in jail.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:19 AM   #58 
              - I thought under your Homeland Media Content Control Act of 2007 it would be part of the power given  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 11:26 AM   #64 
           - Your response makes no sense.  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:12 AM   #48 
     - So someone who reports such should be fined or put in prison?  RGBolen   Oct-11-07 10:54 AM   #11 
        - That would be nice, but fines would do!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:55 AM   #15 
           - So you are against real criminals being in jail, but you think locking up reporters is good?  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 10:57 AM   #22 
              - I wasn't thinking about reporters. I was thinking about executives!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:02 AM   #31 
                 - Oh , I get it....  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:07 AM   #39 
                    - Having Britney on your news channels isn't rational either!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:08 AM   #41 
                       - ~self- delete~  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:15 AM   #52 
  - No. NT  NYCGirl   Oct-11-07 10:47 AM   #2 
  - Why?  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:49 AM   #4 
     - Because government mandated speech is wrong. NT  NYCGirl   Oct-11-07 10:55 AM   #16 
        - It's not mandated speech, it's separation of news and trash...  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:00 AM   #28 
           - Who makes the judgement? It's a very slippery slope you're proposing. NT  NYCGirl   Oct-11-07 11:12 AM   #49 
  - What would they talked about for the other 23 hours?  ChenZhen   Oct-11-07 10:49 AM   #5 
  - There a tons of things they could talk about! They just don't want to!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:51 AM   #6 
  - No news should ever be banned n/t  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 10:52 AM   #7 
  - Britney going to court ISN"T news! Maybe that's the problem  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:54 AM   #12 
  - So who gets to decide what is news?  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 10:55 AM   #17 
  - Do u think Britney going to court is news?  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:09 AM   #42 
     - Nope, but someone else does and they have the right to choose also  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 11:16 AM   #55 
  - so, exactly how would you define what constitutes "news"?  onenote   Oct-11-07 11:41 AM   #73 
  - Youre right. There is probably another Label Pin conspiracy.  ChenZhen   Oct-11-07 10:56 AM   #19 
     - Choosing to tune out is different  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 10:59 AM   #25 
  - no, but "news" should have to be labelled as such and factual.  bullimiami   Oct-11-07 10:53 AM   #9 
  - Violation for the First Amendment.  Clark2008   Oct-11-07 10:54 AM   #10 
  - All I want is a separation between news and trash!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 10:57 AM   #20 
     - It's not that I don't oppose trash on TV, but whose definition of "trash" do we use?  Selatius   Oct-11-07 10:59 AM   #26 
     - We could use Britney and Kfed as guidelines. lol  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:38 AM   #68 
     - Then turn the station when it comes on  Marrah_G   Oct-11-07 10:59 AM   #27 
        - What channel do u suggest? There isn't one. That's the point.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:39 AM   #69 
  - How about we start by banning it in GD?  LeftCoast   Oct-11-07 10:55 AM   #14 
  - Now, now. They've already decided what we want to see and hear...  sutz12   Oct-11-07 10:56 AM   #18 
  - Actually u may be right. It can't possibly be the ratings.....  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:41 AM   #72 
  - No. I say ban all 24hr, "news" channels.  Touchdown   Oct-11-07 10:58 AM   #23 
  - Better idea: Get the government to start initiatives for non-profit news outlets.  Selatius   Oct-11-07 10:58 AM   #24 
  - That's a great idea but they are attacking PBS already with privatization!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:05 AM   #35 
     - PBS operates in a different manner.  Selatius   Oct-11-07 11:12 AM   #50 
        - So u don't think the way c-span is funded is a good idea?  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:22 AM   #61 
  - Isn't it easier to just ban cable news in your livingroom?  sfexpat2000   Oct-11-07 11:01 AM   #29 
  - No!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:10 AM   #43 
     - LOL! Okay!  sfexpat2000   Oct-11-07 11:22 AM   # 
  - What, and deprive ourselves of learning of the antics  Mike03   Oct-11-07 11:02 AM   #32 
  - That's true. But we should have a choice. That's all I'm asking for.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:37 AM   #67 
  - No. Media regulations need to be rolled back to pre-reagan standards. - n/t  porphyrian   Oct-11-07 11:03 AM   #33 
  - Pre-Reagan? Thanx no rolled back. That's brought back!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:11 AM   #46 
  - Really.Terrible.Idea  MrModerate   Oct-11-07 11:06 AM   #37 
  - Absolutely not.  Dulcinea   Oct-11-07 11:14 AM   #51 
  - cable "News" is mostly "Opinion" shows. It shouldn't be called Cable "News".  chimpsrsmarter   Oct-11-07 11:16 AM   #54 
  - Thankyou. I would be happy with that.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:20 AM   #59 
     - Again, exactly how would you define "news"  onenote   Oct-11-07 11:43 AM   #75 
  - This Is Better Than A "Zandor" Thread  DemocratSinceBirth   Oct-11-07 11:22 AM   #60 
  - Who would determine what is is news and what is 'nonnews?'  Freddie Stubbs   Oct-11-07 11:24 AM   #62 
  - I said celebrity's.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:51 AM   #84 
  - Okay! I didn't know this thread was going to get such response..  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:32 AM   #65 
  - You're just wrong  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:40 AM   #70 
  - Actually they've turned the TV off. Have u looked at the ratings?  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:43 AM   #74 
     - And C-Span does nothing  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:47 AM   #77 
        - Brian Lamb says he doesn't know what c-spans ratings are.  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:50 AM   #81 
           - do you think they're higher  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:51 AM   #82 
              - I don't know. According to Brian Lamb there are no ratings....  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:58 AM   #87 
                 - Then you are truly ignorant...  MonkeyFunk   Oct-11-07 11:16 PM   #91 
  - ...  Bornaginhooligan   Oct-11-07 11:40 AM   #71 
  - But the ratings are in the tank but u do make a good point...  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:47 AM   #78 
  - It's not going to happen  NeedleCast   Oct-11-07 11:47 AM   #79 
  - no  Bill McBlueState   Oct-11-07 11:48 AM   #80 
  - congress shall make no law  JitterbugPerfume   Oct-11-07 11:51 AM   #83 
  - Okay. Then I guess we'll just have to nationalize the airwaves!  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 11:53 AM   #86 
     - Joanne, I HATE that crappy celebrity news  JitterbugPerfume   Oct-11-07 12:18 PM   #90 
  - first amendment  lionesspriyanka   Oct-11-07 11:53 AM   #85 
  - Before I go here is a link to some ratings....  Joanne98   Oct-11-07 12:05 PM   #88 
  - So you want the gov't to determine the allowable subject matter? Good one, Bunky.  WinkyDink   Oct-11-07 12:15 PM   #89 
  - (Dupe)  WinkyDink   Oct-11-07 11:21 PM   #92 
  - No. I love hearing about Paris Hilton's latest fuck-up  Dark   Oct-11-07 11:36 PM   #93 
  - I can't think of a way this could be done  nam78_two   Oct-12-07 12:54 AM   #94 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC