NMDemDist2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-13-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message |
| 115. yeah, then Conyers will appoint him special prosecuter |
| -ADMINISTRATION SETTING TABLE FOR DISMISSAL OF PATRICK FITGERALD !!! |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 02:51 PM |
#0 |
-
Wasn't the so-called 'Saturday Night Massacre' the last straw for Nixon's presidency? |
htuttle |
Feb-13-07 02:54 PM |
#1 |
 -
yes, but we are a dumber public now and will just let it happen |
itsmesgd |
Feb-13-07 02:58 PM |
#7 |
  -
Kind of off-topic, but I'd say we are less educated on purpose. |
LonelyLRLiberal |
Feb-13-07 06:01 PM |
#109 |
  -
You have to remember that back in the mid '70's, |
femrap |
Feb-13-07 06:19 PM |
#113 |
 -
The difference is the timing. Cox had just begun investigation. Fitz has now "completed" his. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:00 PM |
#8 |
  -
I don't doubt what you're saying but he did ask if the leak was part of what he was |
cui bono |
Feb-14-07 04:37 AM |
#148 |
 -
Well, yeah, that was the beginning of th end for Crafty Richard. |
Jackpine Radical |
Feb-13-07 03:00 PM |
#9 |
 -
That was back in the days |
seasonedblue |
Feb-13-07 03:06 PM |
#16 |
  -
Yes, the attorney general refused to do Nixon's bidding. HUGE historical |
robinlynne |
Feb-13-07 03:16 PM |
#26 |
 -
Absolutely! How many people did tricky dick go through before he found someone who would? n/t |
hootinholler |
Feb-13-07 05:04 PM |
#87 |
 -
Didn't Bork finally do the firing? nt |
femrap |
Feb-13-07 06:20 PM |
#114 |
 -
Yes, Nixon went through two AG, before settling on Bork to do his dirty work. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 07:12 PM |
#129 |
 -
The mainstream media is much more compliant now |
NewJeffCT |
Feb-13-07 03:30 PM |
#43 |
  -
It won't even go -that- well, because the "LW HEAD" will be Joe Lieberman. nm |
dicksteele |
Feb-13-07 03:40 PM |
#47 |
  -
I think I saw that interview on Hannity & Colmes last night (eom) |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Feb-15-07 12:13 PM |
#159 |
 -
Bingo |
malaise |
Feb-13-07 04:02 PM |
#59 |
 -
Except the GOP didn't control most broadcast media back then. |
blm |
Feb-13-07 04:03 PM |
#62 |
 -
I remember that like it was yesterday |
Jacobin |
Feb-13-07 05:37 PM |
#104 |
-
I remember it very clearly as well.... |
femrap |
Feb-13-07 06:24 PM |
#116 |
-
Interesting speculation. |
Jackpine Radical |
Feb-13-07 02:55 PM |
#2 |
-
Um, they could fire Fitz any time they wanted to. |
Kagemusha |
Feb-13-07 02:55 PM |
# |
 -
Timing is everything. Once Libby is convicted, "there's no longer any need" for Fitz to continue |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:03 PM |
#13 |
-
I'm just saying that was never not in the talking points. |
Kagemusha |
Feb-13-07 03:08 PM |
#18 |
-
To counter that point, |
Qutzupalotl |
Feb-13-07 05:49 PM |
#106 |
-
I wish I could |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 02:55 PM |
#3 |
-
Nope. n/t |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 02:56 PM |
#4 |
 -
I scrolled down for your name to see your "take" |
Horse with no Name |
Feb-13-07 03:00 PM |
#10 |
 -
why? |
LSK |
Feb-13-07 03:07 PM |
#17 |
  -
Because |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 03:25 PM |
#37 |
 -
the Bush admin has the same problem |
LSK |
Feb-13-07 03:28 PM |
#42 |
 -
boy, you sure have a lot of valentines! |
robinlynne |
Feb-13-07 03:17 PM |
#27 |
  -
He sure does! |
cat_girl25 |
Feb-13-07 03:51 PM |
#54 |
 -
I agree, nope nt |
Crabby Appleton |
Feb-13-07 04:39 PM |
#78 |
 -
You can do better than that. |
Morgana LaFey |
Feb-13-07 06:36 PM |
#118 |
-
I'm on htuttle's wavelength on this one. Dismissing prosecutors |
Old Crusoe |
Feb-13-07 02:56 PM |
#5 |
 -
See my #8 or #13 replies - it's all about the timing of the dismissal |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:05 PM |
#15 |
-
Intended my response to be in support of your info... |
Old Crusoe |
Feb-13-07 03:13 PM |
#21 |
-
I wish what you say didn't make sense, but it does. |
SharonRB |
Feb-13-07 02:58 PM |
#6 |
-
BINGO! When I read Fred Thompson's statement I thought |
KoKo01 |
Feb-13-07 03:02 PM |
#11 |
-
I'm going to consult w an old experienced prosecutor for a reasoned opinion. |
lonestarnot |
Feb-13-07 03:02 PM |
#12 |
 -
Nothing they do can shock me anymore. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:10 PM |
#20 |
-
Old prosecutor says no. Special provisions for special prosecutors. |
lonestarnot |
Feb-13-07 03:40 PM |
#48 |
 -
But at Fitz's appointment, Deputy Attorney General Comey suggested otherwise |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:15 PM |
#66 |
-
That is just blah blah blah. Ain't happening. |
lonestarnot |
Feb-13-07 07:05 PM |
#127 |
-
"in practicum" is what matters |
SemperEadem |
Feb-15-07 12:35 PM |
#161 |
-
Gonzales has a snittier smirk than W.... |
femrap |
Feb-13-07 06:26 PM |
#117 |
-
The clarifying letter from Comey to Fitzgerald, spelling out |
Spazito |
Feb-13-07 03:03 PM |
#14 |
 -
but the precedent is established. US Attorney General Gonzales only need wave his hand.. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:13 PM |
#22 |
  -
way wrong. n/t |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 03:13 PM |
#23 |
   -
How is Fitz any different from the recently terminated Gonzo Six? |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:19 PM |
#30 |
    -
He's acting as "special counsel" here, |
Marie26 |
Feb-13-07 05:21 PM |
#96 |
    -
Gonzales recused himself from the CIA Leak Case: He has no legal interest in Fitzgerald (!) ... |
tiptoe |
Feb-15-07 11:25 AM |
#154 |
     -
Excellent find! |
Spazito |
Feb-15-07 11:29 AM |
#155 |
    -
Gonzales already distinguished Pat Fitzgerald as THE determiner of "what will happen going forward" |
tiptoe |
Feb-15-07 11:54 AM |
#157 |
   -
I hope you are WAY RIGHT about it being Way Wrong! |
ClayZ |
Feb-13-07 03:27 PM |
#41 |
  -
I am. n/t |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 04:36 PM |
#73 |
  -
No, in this case, Fitzgerald is NOT serving as US District |
Spazito |
Feb-13-07 03:18 PM |
#29 |
   -
But in that capacity, Fitz is still under Gonzales. And if Alberto says: |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:21 PM |
#32 |
  -
Wrong. |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 03:23 PM |
#34 |
   -
I believe in my OP, I requested that somebody *show me* I'm wrong |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:25 PM |
#36 |
    -
Read. |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 03:26 PM |
#39 |
   -
Wrong. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:28 PM |
#68 |
   -
Read further. n/t |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 04:34 PM |
#70 |
   -
I hope you are right. |
Seldona |
Feb-13-07 05:05 PM |
#88 |
  -
Fitz's boss atthe time he was assigned this case set it up so Fitz can not be removed! |
flyarm |
Feb-13-07 05:09 PM |
#93 |
  -
He can fire him as US Attorney |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 03:20 PM |
#31 |
   -
Thanks Julie. Now we're getting somewhere. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:27 PM |
#40 |
   -
actually, I think only the pres can fire a us attorney |
onenote |
Feb-13-07 03:32 PM |
#44 |
  -
We just went through this in Seattle |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 03:58 PM |
#57 |
  -
Regarding authority of Gonzo to remove Special Council, see seasonedblue's post #49 below. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:08 PM |
#64 |
   -
TinMan, I've read James Comey's comments on the appointment of Mr. Fitzgerald previously |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 04:39 PM |
#77 |
  -
Just to add to your comments, the press conference |
Spazito |
Feb-13-07 05:10 PM |
#94 |
  -
McKay resigned |
onenote |
Feb-13-07 05:32 PM |
#100 |
  -
Don't think you are right |
onenote |
Feb-13-07 03:24 PM |
#35 |
 -
Gonzales just did *exactly that* to six other USDAs - under powers "derived" from the Patriot Act |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:33 PM |
#45 |
 -
Tin Man, |
seasonedblue |
Feb-13-07 03:41 PM |
#49 |
  -
Thanks for that info. If Comey figured he had the authority, then by extension, Gonzales has it too. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 03:53 PM |
#55 |
  -
This press conference took place Dec/2003 before.... |
Spazito |
Feb-13-07 05:06 PM |
#89 |
 -
Thank you, |
seasonedblue |
Feb-13-07 06:56 PM |
#126 |
 -
Good work, Spaz - a gold star for your succint explanation |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 08:06 PM |
#132 |
 -
Thanks, Tin Man! Posting theories, opinions are the best |
Spazito |
Feb-13-07 09:13 PM |
#137 |
 -
Yes, and it's always good |
seasonedblue |
Feb-15-07 12:02 PM |
#158 |
 -
I think your posting the press conference was a GOOD thing! |
Spazito |
Feb-15-07 12:14 PM |
#160 |
 -
special protections for special prosecutors regardless of patriot cow paddy. |
lonestarnot |
Feb-13-07 03:42 PM |
#50 |
 -
wrong. Gonzales did not fire the other USDAs under powers from the Patriot Act |
onenote |
Feb-13-07 05:22 PM |
#97 |
 -
"Stepping down" is defacto firing. People don't volunteer to resign without credible threat |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 05:31 PM |
#99 |
 -
right. but I don't think Fitz is susceptible to that sort of intimidation |
onenote |
Feb-13-07 05:34 PM |
#102 |
 -
Bingo |
proud patriot |
Feb-13-07 05:35 PM |
#103 |
-
The cat is out of the bag... |
Hubert Flottz |
Feb-13-07 03:08 PM |
#19 |
 -
You're right - we need Keith Olbermann to mention this - put it on the record |
file83 |
Feb-14-07 12:22 AM |
#140 |
-
It will be on a Friday with other events dominating the news |
herbster |
Feb-13-07 03:14 PM |
#24 |
-
This is discouraging... |
meldroc |
Feb-13-07 03:14 PM |
#25 |
 -
Fitz is not an Independent Counsel. Independent Counsel law expired in 1999 & was not renewed. n/t |
Garbo 2004 |
Feb-14-07 03:34 AM |
#147 |
-
Actually, it was the independent prosecutor law that expired |
JulieRB |
Feb-15-07 11:53 AM |
#156 |
-
I wonder what took them so long? |
The Backlash Cometh |
Feb-13-07 03:18 PM |
#28 |
-
It sounds like Fitz is on the right track |
C_U_L8R |
Feb-13-07 03:23 PM |
#33 |
-
Well, good luck with that. |
aquart |
Feb-13-07 03:26 PM |
#38 |
-
Never in hell |
WilliamPitt |
Feb-13-07 03:36 PM |
#46 |
 -
Thank you. |
lonestarnot |
Feb-13-07 03:42 PM |
#52 |
 -
Altho Fitz cannot be removed, the US Attorneys recently were, hamstringing |
Dems Will Win |
Feb-13-07 03:49 PM |
#53 |
 -
It's also important |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 04:02 PM |
#60 |
  -
What cause did Nixon have for firing Cox???? |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:33 PM |
#69 |
 -
Nope. |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 04:35 PM |
#71 |
 -
Gonzo and Bush are free to invent reasons, too. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:37 PM |
#74 |
 -
You are silly. |
H2O Man |
Feb-13-07 04:38 PM |
#76 |
 -
If you need a refresher: Time Magazine. Oct. 29, 1973 |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:42 PM |
#80 |
 -
Iraq. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:04 PM |
#63 |
  -
If you don't think they've already been over his background |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 04:48 PM |
# |
 -
He wanted to get a cat? Off-topic but |
glitch |
Feb-13-07 06:01 PM |
#108 |
 -
It's time for some off-topic Patrick Fitzgerald love! |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 06:38 PM |
#120 |
 -
In their arrogance, however, I have heard several supporters of |
Arkansas Granny |
Feb-13-07 04:27 PM |
#67 |
  -
You're right. "Plame wasn't undercover. It's a witch hunt by the Bush haters..." yadda yadda yadda |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:35 PM |
#72 |
 -
Seeing "seventeen kinds of fresh hell" set loose amoung the cabal |
sellitman |
Feb-13-07 06:48 PM |
#123 |
 -
Am I the only one in the world |
JulieRB |
Feb-13-07 06:51 PM |
#124 |
-
Someone upthread made a good point about this. |
WilliamPitt |
Feb-13-07 07:11 PM |
#128 |
-
Or maybe someone in Congress will ask him to testify. |
conscious evolution |
Feb-13-07 07:39 PM |
#130 |
-
I'm sure our courageous risk-taking media has lots of runaway brides, diapered astronauts, |
aint_no_life_nowhere |
Feb-13-07 03:42 PM |
#51 |
-
Why is it that all-caps titles always lead to a lousy post? |
La_Fourmi_Rouge |
Feb-13-07 03:55 PM |
#56 |
 -
If I could recommend a post in this thread it would be yours |
Laurab |
Feb-13-07 06:44 PM |
#121 |
-
I double dog dare 'em ! |
TorchesAndPitchforks |
Feb-13-07 03:59 PM |
#58 |
-
K& R. |
Cobalt Violet |
Feb-13-07 04:02 PM |
#61 |
-
kinda late for that if you ask me |
HuffleClaw |
Feb-13-07 04:15 PM |
#65 |
-
I think they hired Fitz cause he's a repuke, and figured that HE would be their patsy nt |
gulfcoastliberal |
Feb-13-07 04:37 PM |
#75 |
-
That's what I thought when I read Thompson's remarks |
SquireJons |
Feb-13-07 04:42 PM |
#79 |
 -
Agree wholeheartedly, 100% - nt |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 04:49 PM |
#82 |
-
So, God forbid, suppose no one beyond Libby is convicted... |
Frustratedlady |
Feb-13-07 04:48 PM |
#81 |
-
I would defer to H20 Man's judgment (and crystal ball) on anything to do with |
Peace Patriot |
Feb-13-07 04:54 PM |
#83 |
 -
Sealed vs Sealed: Fitz' automatic "Doomsday Machine" response to any "dismissal attack"? |
tiptoe |
Feb-17-07 03:07 AM |
#162 |
-
And in answer to my premature question: "Does Fitz' report...to anyone in AG Office?"...from #110: |
tiptoe |
Feb-17-07 05:20 AM |
#163 |
-
Wait, So That Melodramatic All Caps Header And Rambling Body All Came Down To "Cause I Think So"??? |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Feb-13-07 04:54 PM |
#84 |
 -
Read it again. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 05:01 PM |
#86 |
  -
No Thanks. I Wasted Enough Time Already Reading It The First Time. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Feb-13-07 05:07 PM |
#91 |
 -
Yours, by contrast, are non-existent. Same as it ever was. |
Jim Sagle |
Feb-13-07 11:31 PM |
#139 |
 -
Perhaps the handle of the OP |
Patsy Stone |
Feb-13-07 06:51 PM |
#125 |
-
I see but... |
JackRiddler |
Feb-13-07 05:00 PM |
#85 |
 -
Or alternatively, attack Iraq, then shitcan Fitz - and Cheney stays put. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 05:06 PM |
#90 |
-
Why bother? |
Marie26 |
Feb-13-07 05:07 PM |
#92 |
 -
The action would *NOT* happen now. Libby's trial will conclude, with Fitz in charge. |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 05:24 PM |
#98 |
-
There's no indication they're planning to do that |
Marie26 |
Feb-13-07 05:34 PM |
#101 |
 -
Yes, they won't fire Fitz in the middle. But once Libby is convicted, no "need" for Fitz to remain |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 05:44 PM |
#105 |
-
Nah |
Marie26 |
Feb-13-07 05:53 PM |
#107 |
-
It's not Fitz's grand jury. It's not a special grand jury dedicated solely to Fitz's investigation. |
Garbo 2004 |
Feb-14-07 03:22 AM |
#146 |
-
GJ term expires this April |
Tin Man |
Feb-14-07 08:47 AM |
#150 |
-
Fitzgerald can always use a regular Federal grand jury.... |
Spazito |
Feb-14-07 09:06 AM |
#151 |
-
No need to fire Fitzgerald.... |
MilesColtrane |
Feb-13-07 05:11 PM |
#95 |
 -
Yes, "Plan A" is to sacrifice Libby. What I have described is "Plan B" |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 06:17 PM |
#112 |
-
Fitz can't be removed as Special Counsel. |
Independent_Liberal |
Feb-13-07 06:08 PM |
#110 |
-
I remember the outrage when Nixon's people fucked with the justice system |
antifaschits |
Feb-13-07 06:17 PM |
#111 |
-
yeah, then Conyers will appoint him special prosecuter |
AZDemDist6 |
Feb-13-07 06:20 PM |
#115 |
-
Just want to add a comment on the Comey letter, and any reliance on a |
Peace Patriot |
Feb-13-07 06:37 PM |
#119 |
 -
"We live in a bubble of Bush facism" |
agincourt |
Feb-14-07 12:35 AM |
#141 |
-
I love it.. |
sendero |
Feb-13-07 06:48 PM |
#122 |
-
The most important thing on their agenda is to make a last gasp |
higher class |
Feb-13-07 07:51 PM |
#131 |
-
Did you go with TIN MAN just so that people would give you |
BuyingThyme |
Feb-13-07 08:12 PM |
#133 |
 -
ROTFLMAO !!! |
Tin Man |
Feb-13-07 08:18 PM |
#134 |
-
Tin Man, you are scaring me big time... |
derby378 |
Feb-13-07 08:22 PM |
#135 |
-
That is what I have been afraid of. They will not let anyone do the |
jwirr |
Feb-13-07 09:12 PM |
#136 |
-
I would imagine that the Congress wouldn't roll over for that. |
Vinnie From Indy |
Feb-13-07 09:41 PM |
#138 |
-
this IS the most corrupt administration in history, right? |
Stephanie |
Feb-14-07 12:42 AM |
#142 |
-
"The Man" speaks the truth as to the intentions of the "evil doers" |
autorank |
Feb-14-07 01:43 AM |
#143 |
-
Hmm, sounds complicated |
ProudDad |
Feb-14-07 01:43 AM |
#144 |
-
Totally vile, and completely logical. |
Edweird |
Feb-14-07 03:03 AM |
#145 |
-
Looks like people need to actually read legislation... |
GreenEyedLefty |
Feb-14-07 07:42 AM |
#149 |
-
Great post Tin Man |
bobbie |
Feb-14-07 10:47 AM |
#152 |
-
So, do they dismiss him now, during the Libby trial, or afterwards? |
leveymg |
Feb-14-07 02:49 PM |
#153 |