muriel_volestrangler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-09-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Please do not continue arguments from other threads.
|
| -Nancy Pelosi: Traitor, bitch, fuck her |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:13 PM |
#0 |
-
Oh yeah... they should feel a lot better... |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 03:15 PM |
#1 |
 -
Posts like that pointed out by the OP are as manipulative as any RW rag. |
sicksicksick_N_tired |
Oct-09-07 03:36 PM |
#53 |
-
Nancy Pelosi: Knows which side her bread is buttered |
Ezlivin |
Oct-09-07 03:15 PM |
#2 |
 -
Yes, that's much better. |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:17 PM |
#8 |
-
People who say things like that are delusional idiots |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:16 PM |
#3 |
 -
How does the government work? |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:18 PM |
#12 |
  -
by voting????? you are not familiar with basic civics??? |
LSK |
Oct-09-07 03:20 PM |
#15 |
   -
Voting for what? More power for the Chimps? |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:22 PM |
#19 |
  -
voting for bills that are voted to move on from Committees |
LSK |
Oct-09-07 03:26 PM |
#24 |
  -
Wait a minute. Are you telling me that you are buying into the Pelosi lies |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:29 PM |
#32 |
   -
And you know this how? Are you someone who knows... |
TreasonousBastard |
Oct-09-07 03:35 PM |
#52 |
  -
I am informed. I am someone who knows. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:37 PM |
#57 |
  -
here is my source, WHAT IS YOURS? |
LSK |
Oct-09-07 04:43 PM |
#109 |
  -
Great. Now you know how bills get to committees. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 04:52 PM |
#116 |
  -
who do you think is bringing those bills to the floor for a vote? |
cui bono |
Oct-09-07 04:08 PM |
#81 |
  -
what does Steny Hoyer do? |
LSK |
Oct-09-07 04:33 PM |
#104 |
  -
Blah, blah, blah |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:27 PM |
#29 |
 -
Here's how: Pelosi managed to turn Bush's crimes into legislation. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:31 PM |
#38 |
 -
You're kidding, right? |
proud2Blib |
Oct-09-07 03:41 PM |
#64 |
 -
If you are going to call people idiots, |
KCdemocrat |
Oct-09-07 03:27 PM |
#26 |
  -
I made a typing mistake, big deal! |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:29 PM |
#33 |
 -
No, you made a horrible mistake... |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 03:32 PM |
# |
 -
What's horrible about some ad hominem? |
leftist_not_liberal |
Oct-09-07 04:10 PM |
#83 |
 -
Thanks... You've helped me make a decision... |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 03:31 PM |
#39 |
 -
really? I know what thread this comes from and frankly, I am SICK |
roguevalley |
Oct-09-07 03:48 PM |
#72 |
-
Hear! Hear! |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 04:31 PM |
#101 |
-
Ignore the enablers |
Hydra |
Oct-09-07 04:53 PM |
#118 |
-
IBTL |
King Coal |
Oct-09-07 03:16 PM |
#4 |
-
She continues to support the war. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-09-07 03:16 PM |
#5 |
 -
She does not support the war |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:17 PM |
#7 |
  -
No, it's an outright lie to say she doesn't. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-09-07 03:18 PM |
#10 |
   -
The truth is a little more complex than that and you know that |
nadinbrzezinski |
Oct-09-07 03:22 PM |
#18 |
    -
Mmm, no it's not. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-09-07 03:23 PM |
#21 |
   -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-09-07 03:28 PM |
#30 |
    -
Much like your arrogance.... eom |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 03:33 PM |
#45 |
    -
consider this: Unless you have someone in the war, its all academic. |
roguevalley |
Oct-09-07 03:58 PM |
#80 |
   -
Let me say I do have someone there and I agree completely with Cali. |
Marrah_G |
Oct-09-07 04:17 PM |
#91 |
   -
i accept that. but know this, my view is equally valid. anything less |
roguevalley |
Oct-09-07 04:21 PM |
#95 |
   -
Yes your view is your view and you have every right to it |
Marrah_G |
Oct-09-07 04:24 PM |
#98 |
   -
I find it very interesting that people are against calling Pelosi names... |
Juniperx |
Oct-09-07 04:32 PM |
#102 |
   -
Yes it is... and by the way, there are more than just two sides |
nadinbrzezinski |
Oct-09-07 03:34 PM |
#46 |
   -
She doesn't push through the funding |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:23 PM |
#20 |
  -
then you bring it up the next day and the next and the next until |
roguevalley |
Oct-09-07 03:52 PM |
#77 |
  -
Hiya KIng! |
King Coal |
Oct-09-07 03:35 PM |
#50 |
 -
Starting off with a blatant |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:19 PM |
#13 |
  -
She continues to push through funding. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Oct-09-07 03:20 PM |
#14 |
  -
How 'bout the fact that she actively participated in bringing forth the bill that is funding it... |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:25 PM |
#23 |
 -
What bill would that be? |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:29 PM |
#34 |
 -
I'm talking about the last time she screwed us on Iraq. (Or the one before that.) |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:34 PM |
#48 |
 -
That's kind of a lie isn't it? |
bryant69 |
Oct-09-07 03:31 PM |
#40 |
-
No, I'm pretty sure he thinks what he said is the truth |
LittleClarkie |
Oct-09-07 04:13 PM |
# |
-
The vulgarity is less vulgar than the reality. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:17 PM |
#6 |
 -
What tripe. One actually has nothing to do with |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:25 PM |
#22 |
-
So, you don't understand that people call Nancy Pelosi names because |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:26 PM |
#25 |
-
A devout enemy of the constitution? |
KingFlorez |
Oct-09-07 03:30 PM |
#36 |
 -
She hates the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and is doing |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:32 PM |
#41 |
-
Can I call you a name? |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:31 PM |
#37 |
 -
It's all you can do because you can't deal with the facts. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:33 PM |
#44 |
-
Bwahaha. coming from you that really is funny as hell |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:52 PM |
#76 |
-
Funny thing. I'm the only one who provided proof. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:57 PM |
#79 |
-
You provide zero proof and certainly not from Turley |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:09 PM |
#82 |
-
Yep, I run around calling people ignorant and it's immoral |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 04:19 PM |
#93 |
-
"A devout enemy of our Constitution?" |
EstimatedProphet |
Oct-09-07 03:35 PM |
#51 |
-
*snicker* |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:36 PM |
#54 |
-
Look, you can't pick and choose the stuff you like in the Constitution. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:39 PM |
#60 |
-
You say that, and then you say it isn't hyperbole |
EstimatedProphet |
Oct-09-07 03:43 PM |
#66 |
-
Yes, she is actively supporting a bill that she knows to be in direct |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:45 PM |
#68 |
-
Freeper hate is not exclusively conservative. |
onehandle |
Oct-09-07 03:17 PM |
#9 |
-
I agree. I too wish it were possible for Nancy to do the "impossible' but |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 03:18 PM |
#11 |
-
Most people here would never ever have the guts to say that to Nancy's face |
tandot |
Oct-09-07 03:21 PM |
#16 |
 -
Many people here will never have an opportunity to say that to Nancy's face |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:42 PM |
#65 |
-
"Truth" as YOU see it. |
tandot |
Oct-09-07 03:48 PM |
#70 |
-
Yes, it has been well over a year and a half since Nancy Pelosi has |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 03:54 PM |
#78 |
-
Well, if YOU are one of her constituents, just contact her |
tandot |
Oct-09-07 04:16 PM |
#89 |
-
I've contacted her many times. That's why she no longer holds |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 04:20 PM |
#94 |
-
Thank you Cali... Sometimes it is worse then freeperville here. |
Marrah_G |
Oct-09-07 03:21 PM |
#17 |
-
Recommending |
mitchtv |
Oct-09-07 03:27 PM |
#27 |
-
Thank you, Cali. |
Kajsa |
Oct-09-07 03:27 PM |
#28 |
-
K & R from me. Thanks Cali. n/t |
KAZ |
Oct-09-07 03:28 PM |
#31 |
-
In my opinion she is a failure. |
mmonk |
Oct-09-07 03:30 PM |
#35 |
 -
Then this isn't addressed to you. |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:32 PM |
#42 |
-
Does that mean I can't comment? |
mmonk |
Oct-09-07 03:50 PM |
#73 |
-
We as a people no longer know how to communicate. |
Writer |
Oct-09-07 03:32 PM |
#43 |
-
there will always be vulgar ones, cali |
yodermon |
Oct-09-07 03:34 PM |
#47 |
-
LEAVE NANCY ALONE!!!!!111 |
jgraz |
Oct-09-07 03:34 PM |
#49 |
 -
yawn. I expect better of you |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:39 PM |
#59 |
-
I'm detecting a pattern here, and a propensity for strawmen |
jgraz |
Oct-09-07 03:51 PM |
#74 |
-
No. This post was inspired |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:25 PM |
#99 |
-
More straw men and non sequitors |
jgraz |
Oct-09-07 04:52 PM |
#115 |
-
How about "quisling worm?" |
backscatter712 |
Oct-09-07 03:37 PM |
#55 |
 -
quisling worm=traitor |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:41 PM |
#62 |
-
If the name fits... |
backscatter712 |
Oct-09-07 03:52 PM |
#75 |
-
and I'm calling |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:13 PM |
#85 |
-
Cali |
MonkeyFunk |
Oct-09-07 03:37 PM |
#56 |
 -
Sorry, I didn't even think of that. n/t |
cali |
Oct-09-07 03:40 PM |
#61 |
-
Yeah, not exactly what one expects from "the good guys". |
progressoid |
Oct-09-07 03:38 PM |
#58 |
-
Keyboard Commandoes suck. |
JNelson6563 |
Oct-09-07 03:41 PM |
#63 |
-
Agreed, and I've been saying all along that... |
TreasonousBastard |
Oct-09-07 03:44 PM |
#67 |
-
Isn't Nancy Pelosi the woman that Hillary haters wanted so badly |
Tactical Progressive |
Oct-09-07 03:47 PM |
#69 |
-
"It was the best of times. It was the worst of times ..." |
hfojvt |
Oct-09-07 03:48 PM |
#71 |
-
Well if she can't handle the job, she needs to step aside. |
cui bono |
Oct-09-07 04:10 PM |
#84 |
 -
Hope you like Speaker Hoyer. n/t |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:14 PM |
#87 |
-
Yeah, we're fucked no matter what. That's why people are so disgusted |
cui bono |
Oct-09-07 04:23 PM |
#96 |
-
If there isn't a word that describes ... |
Everybody |
Oct-09-07 04:14 PM |
#86 |
 -
Or you can call me traitor |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:16 PM |
#90 |
-
amen. nt |
lionesspriyanka |
Oct-09-07 04:14 PM |
#88 |
-
Where are all the Hillary supporters who say such language is unacceptable? Is it okay for Pelosi bu |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 04:17 PM |
#92 |
 -
Why drag Hillary into this? |
ronnykmarshall |
Oct-09-07 04:48 PM |
#113 |
-
Nope.It is just that so many said it wasn't just a political issue when Hillary was called names. |
saracat |
Oct-09-07 04:55 PM |
#120 |
-
The provocative headline schtick is getting out of control. n/t |
rucky |
Oct-09-07 04:23 PM |
#97 |
-
Nancy has fucked the future perception of how Dems handled the past! |
RiverStone |
Oct-09-07 04:29 PM |
#100 |
 -
I hate that will of people crap more than almost anything. |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:33 PM |
#103 |
-
please elaborate... |
RiverStone |
Oct-09-07 04:46 PM |
#112 |
-
Oh come off it. There is no (but NO) explanation for what she is doing to protect the criminals. |
The Stranger |
Oct-09-07 04:34 PM |
#105 |
 -
Guess what? |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:43 PM |
#110 |
-
failure to act is passive protection at the least... |
RiverStone |
Oct-09-07 04:53 PM |
#117 |
-
According to the list given by Will Pitt, the bill is actually quite acceptable |
MasonJar |
Oct-09-07 04:37 PM |
#106 |
 -
That may or may not be true, but the Senate version does just that. |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 04:38 PM |
#107 |
-
Prove it. Show us the language. n/t |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:41 PM |
#108 |
-
I don't even know where the language is, but I'm an informed person who |
BuyingThyme |
Oct-09-07 04:46 PM |
#111 |
-
I'm disappointed and I'm expressing it. |
Lerkfish |
Oct-09-07 04:52 PM |
#114 |
-
Do you think that Iraqis would cut her any slack? |
Jacobin |
Oct-09-07 04:53 PM |
#119 |
 -
I have no idea. And neither do you. n/t |
cali |
Oct-09-07 04:57 PM |
#121 |
-
Locking |
muriel_volestrangler |
Oct-09-07 04:58 PM |
#122 |