You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Yuppers, everything is Nancy Pelosi's fault. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-03-07 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yuppers, everything is Nancy Pelosi's fault.
Let's not blame poor Bush for his veto. Let's blame Nancy.

While we're at it, why don't we blame the Democrats for everything BushCo has ever done? I think that's fair - doesn't everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Hey Nancy -- What about those kids? JMDEM  Oct-03-07 07:31 PM   #0 
  - Yuppers, everything is Nancy Pelosi's fault.  NanceGreggs   Oct-03-07 07:49 PM   #1 
  - He needs to be held accountable, Nance  proud2Blib   Oct-03-07 07:51 PM   #2 
  - I have no problem with blaming the Dems ...  NanceGreggs   Oct-03-07 08:45 PM   #6 
     - I believe impeachment would derail them  proud2Blib   Oct-03-07 10:50 PM   #7 
        - Or it might embolden them, and recapture their lost support.  NanceGreggs   Oct-03-07 11:47 PM   #23 
        - Pelosi didn't block impeachment. She counted votes  onenote   Oct-03-07 11:52 PM   #24 
           - She took it off the table before she even counted any votes  proud2Blib   Oct-04-07 12:19 AM   #25 
              - she took it off the table (as did Howard Dean) during the campaign  onenote   Oct-04-07 12:36 AM   #27 
                 - Which pro-impeachment candidates lost?  Senator   Oct-04-07 06:43 AM   #30 
                    - here's a list of "pro impeachment" candidates -- no winners amongst them  onenote   Oct-04-07 08:09 AM   #31 
                       - None of them had winnable races -- impeachment or not  Senator   Oct-04-07 08:56 AM   #32 
                          - if impeachment is a winning strategy why wasn't it a winning issue?  onenote   Oct-04-07 09:41 PM   #39 
                             - We just saw that it was  Senator   Oct-05-07 07:22 AM   #41 
                                - a lot of Democrats were elected narrowly. none promoted impeachment  onenote   Oct-05-07 03:08 PM   #42 
                                   - And a lot lost narrowly too  Senator   Oct-06-07 02:56 AM   #43 
  - I think I made it very clear  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 07:54 PM   #3 
  - Democrats begin push to override veto of kids health insurance bill  spanone   Oct-03-07 08:01 PM   #4 
  - If the override occurs, I will cheer from the rooftops  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 08:34 PM   #5 
     - If they don't have the votes to override the veto, how do they have the votes to oust Bush?  Telly Savalas   Oct-03-07 11:02 PM   #8 
        - You know, you are right  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:07 PM   #10 
           - thank you for your lack of a thoughtful response  onenote   Oct-03-07 11:45 PM   #22 
  - You aren't going to wait and see re the override? Just gona jump right out there?  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:05 PM   #9 
  - You are 100% right.  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:09 PM   #11 
     - Adios then amigo.  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:19 PM   #13 
        - No, I'm gonna hang around and fight back  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:21 PM   #15 
           - No. I believe you are jumping the gun on the kids' insurance. And good luck with that  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:23 PM   #16 
              - And pray tell -- what has Bush NOT received that he's wanted in the last 11 months?  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:25 PM   #18 
                 - Pugs are crapping themselves. That I can already see.  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:42 PM   #21 
  - I had gas tonight  Husb2Sparkly   Oct-03-07 11:11 PM   #12 
  - So you don't think impeachment proceedings are called for, I assume  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:19 PM   #14 
     - You need to get a clue duddie.  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:24 PM   #17 
        - I'd say you do too  JMDEM   Oct-03-07 11:26 PM   #19 
           - You haven't been around long enough to be calling posters out about unknowns.  lonestarnot   Oct-03-07 11:38 PM   #20 
              - What kind of tubes are you talking about?  proud2Blib   Oct-04-07 12:23 AM   #26 
  - k&r. i think impeachment hearings would open a lot of shit up for the  orleans   Oct-04-07 12:58 AM   #28 
  - you could be right. But how do you get to that point?  onenote   Oct-04-07 09:45 PM   #40 
  - What a ridiculous leap.  cali   Oct-04-07 05:32 AM   #29 
  - Except that they would know we mean business  JMDEM   Oct-04-07 09:08 AM   #33 
     - repukes weren't a majority from 1994 on. Clinton  cali   Oct-04-07 12:04 PM   #38 
  - So Cheney Would Have Signed It?  Zandor   Oct-04-07 10:22 AM   #34 
     - Pay attention  proud2Blib   Oct-04-07 11:35 AM   #35 
        - And then Bush will be tried and hung?  Zandor   Oct-04-07 11:54 AM   #36 
           - As if you really were interested  proud2Blib   Oct-04-07 12:00 PM   #37 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC