You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: You stated the presidency was THE bully pulpit to raise this issue [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-29-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. You stated the presidency was THE bully pulpit to raise this issue
Now you state the excuse that Bill Clinton is no Al Gore? So which is it? If Mr. Gore can as he has already proven get this message out effectively to bring about what must be done now as a statesman and advocate because this crisis is not to be used as a political wedge or game because it is real, then I think he should continue doing it. And should he receive the Nobel Peace Prize that will be validation that his work since leaving that beltway that stifled him is on the right path.

I do not believe the presidency of the US is the be all end all everyone else is making it. You would think we lived in an aristocracy instead of a Democracy the way people go on and on and on about it. Thomas Jefferson did much of his most memorable and greatest work not in the presidency. All those through our history of this country we remember and revere most for their accomplishments were not president and they did influence policy. The title is not indicative of results, it is the character of the man or women performing those works and having the true backing of the people that counts.

It also isn't the duty of one person to singlehandedly find solutions and dictate policy. He could do only what Congress would bring forward, and judging by the past and actually the present I don't see the evasive action that we need on this crisis now (90% reductions by 2050 and I think earlier) unless people demand it and they can't demand it in the numbers necessary unless they are informed about it.

And to say that ONLY a president has power is to demean the entire meaning of what it means to live in a country where it is supposed to be the people who have the power. Bill Clinton could then most definitely have taken a cue from Mr. Gore when he was Vice President and MAKE THIS the cause. I don't accept any excuses on that front, but I believe the reason why Bill Clinton didn't do it is the same reason why no one else in that position has or will yet... it is still not at the stage where the people believe it to be urgent enough over ending this war, having healthcare, and making enough to survive. So you tell me how Mr. Gore would run now with this as his platform and still be able to devote the time necessary to leading a global grassroots movement he has begun that now must keep its momentum by having him at the helm of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC