pacalo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-24-07 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. For me, it's a no-brainer: yes, they should be outed. |
|
If they are bold enough to garner votes from the religious fundamentalists by speaking out against gays & supporting legislation that takes away or denies human rights from gays, then the hypocritical public servants more than deserve to have their true colors shown for all to see.
|
| -Should all Republican gays be "outed?" |
Cyrano |
Sep-24-07 01:47 PM |
#0 |
 -
Although I'm generally against outing in private life, |
Warpy |
Sep-24-07 01:51 PM |
#1 |
| -
For me, it's a no-brainer: yes, they should be outed. |
8_year_nightmare |
Sep-24-07 01:54 PM |
#2 |
| -
I wish they could be 'outed'... |
stillcool47 |
Sep-24-07 01:58 PM |
#3 |
| -
If they vote with |
Nite Owl |
Sep-24-07 02:01 PM |
#4 |
| -
Yes Yes Yes |
donheld |
Sep-24-07 02:02 PM |
#5 |
| -
hard for me to answer that as I think there should be no reason for the closet in the first place |
madokie |
Sep-24-07 02:04 PM |
#6 |
| -
Absolutely. |
lateo |
Sep-24-07 02:09 PM |
#7 |
| -
If they oppose rights for gays, and they are themselves gay, that should be public info. (nt) |
FreepFryer |
Sep-24-07 02:10 PM |
#8 |
| -
No |
Ohio Joe |
Sep-24-07 02:11 PM |
#9 |
  -
That reminds me of the old public information campaign against drunk drivers. |
yardwork |
Sep-24-07 02:14 PM |
#12 |
| -
Using someone sexuality against them... |
Ohio Joe |
Sep-24-07 02:19 PM |
#14 |
| -
Did you even read my post? I specifically stated that humiliation is not my goal at all. |
yardwork |
Sep-24-07 02:44 PM |
#22 |
| -
Yes, I did read it |
Ohio Joe |
Sep-24-07 02:51 PM |
#23 |
| -
I guess you're right. I really don't care if lying hypocritical Republicans get humiliated. |
yardwork |
Sep-24-07 03:10 PM |
#24 |
| -
No, not "all." Only the ones who, by their words and votes in Congress, |
MADem |
Sep-24-07 02:13 PM |
#10 |
| -
Ayup. |
Tesha |
Sep-24-07 02:14 PM |
#11 |
| -
Yes. they give you an opening, you take it. |
bunkerbuster1 |
Sep-24-07 02:16 PM |
#13 |
| -
so you would go beyond those in government and include private citizens as well? |
onenote |
Sep-24-07 02:35 PM |
#15 |
| -
It's only slippery *theoretically*, not practically. |
BlooInBloo |
Sep-24-07 02:37 PM |
#17 |
| -
Perhaps I wasn't specific enough. I was referring to elected Republicans and |
Cyrano |
Sep-24-07 02:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
I'm ok with it, but I understand why people would also be against it..... |
BlooInBloo |
Sep-24-07 02:37 PM |
#16 |
| -
No. |
BuyingThyme |
Sep-24-07 02:38 PM |
#18 |
| -
What gays? We have no such phenomenon in this country. |
Atman |
Sep-24-07 02:39 PM |
#19 |
| -
No. That would make us no better than the freepers. |
Cleita |
Sep-24-07 02:39 PM |
#20 |
| -
The almost total corruption of the Republican Party is so incredibly obvious that |
Cyrano |
Sep-24-07 03:27 PM |
#25 |
| -
I think that eventually they will be outted by their own actions |
Cleita |
Sep-24-07 03:34 PM |
#26 |
| -
"Outed"? no. "Ousted", yep |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Sep-24-07 03:34 PM |
#27 |
| -
IMO, the majority of Americans already know about the Republican tie-ins |
Cyrano |
Sep-24-07 04:15 PM |
#30 |
| -
If they oppose gay-rights and support a virulent anti-gay policy then I say YES. |
truebrit71 |
Sep-24-07 03:35 PM |
#28 |
| -
Not all Republicans |
insleeforprez |
Sep-24-07 03:36 PM |
#29 |
| -
If they vote against rights for gay people ---> yes. nt |
Oregonian |
Sep-24-07 04:42 PM |
#31 |
| -
It matters a lot if they are vocal gay bashers. |
Pyrzqxgl |
Sep-24-07 06:12 PM |
#32 |
| -
YES...any "family values, holier-than-though, anti-gay" HYPOCRITE should be outed. n/t |
in_cog_ni_to |
Sep-24-07 06:14 PM |
#33 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread