Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

Reply #109: Oh, goody. Another anti-sex screed from the "brilliant" Dworkin, disguised as "social commentary". [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Mon Sep-24-07 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
109. Oh, goody. Another anti-sex screed from the "brilliant" Dworkin, disguised as "social commentary".
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 12:29 AM by impeachdubya
Let's cut to the chase, here. Andrea Dworkin may not have said "all heterosexual sex is rape" in so many words, but she did say that heterosexual, penetrative sex as practiced on Planet Earth is inherently oppressive, coercive, and downright evil. Essentially, her philosophy can be summed up in one sentence: That any time a male penis comes into contact with the body of a female, all women are harmed and all women are oppressed.

To some, she was "brilliant". To many of the rest of us, she was bat-shit crazy, or at least someone with some serious issues, and quite possibly a dollop of mental illness to boot. A sad figure, perhaps, but certainly not someone whose dubious 'insights' about the pernicious evil of the way the vast majority of the consenting adults on this planet happen to screw should be given a whole lot of credence.

She's right about one thing, (although I don't think she bothers to say it in so many words, busy as she is railing against the evils of penile penetration) homophobia and discrimination against gays and lesbians is wrong. Of course, as Pat Buchanan demonstrates, even a broken clock is right twice a day. And many gay men are also enthusiastic consumers of porn and guilty of "objectifying" other gay men, so one wonders how that plugs into Dworkin and her admirers' pet issue, namely, stopping consenting adults from getting off while looking at pictures of other consenting adults nude or screwing. (I bet you thought this thread was actually about homophobia- surprise! It's not, it's just yet another lame axe-grinding attempt to re-ignite the porn wars here at DU. You can thank me, later, for bringing that to your attention.)

Here are some more quotes from the "brilliant" Ms. Dworkin. Like the song says, Decide Yourself.

Men are distinguished from women by their commitment to do violence rather than to be victimized by it.

No woman needs intercourse; few women escape it.

Only when manhood is dead - and it will perish when ravaged femininity no longer sustains it - only then will we know what it is to be free.

Seduction is often difficult to distinguish from rape. In seduction, the rapist often bothers to buy a bottle of wine.

You think intercourse is a private act; it's not, it's a social act.

Childbearing is glorified in part because women die from it.

For men I suspect that this transformation begins in the place they most dread -- that is, in a limp penis. I think that men will have to give up their precious erections and begin to make love as women do together.

Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men's contempt for women.



Oh, yeah. But the cult of Dworkin isn't anti-sex, or anti-male, or anti-heterosexual sex. Really! And how dare you even suggest such a ludicrous notion! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  The Origin of Homophobia Katherine Brengle  Sep-23-07 09:46 AM   #0 
   Do you have a source for your opening passages?  Buzz Clik   Sep-23-07 09:49 AM   #1 
   Did you read the post?  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 09:52 AM   #2 
   Doubtless Ms. Dworkin, Sir: The Style Is Quite Distinctive  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 10:06 AM   #7 
      Quite possibly. Knowing that she has a following at DU would explain much.  Buzz Clik   Sep-23-07 10:27 AM   #17 
         A "following?"  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 11:22 AM   #23 
         But Of Course, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 11:31 AM   #26 
         You equate "following" to media-brainwashed "loser"?  Buzz Clik   Sep-23-07 11:33 AM   #28 
         Oh yes, thank you very much  Terran   Sep-24-07 02:49 PM   #128 
         No.  Bornaginhooligan   Sep-24-07 03:28 PM   #132 
         Well, since you're familiar with her work, you could tell us if the quotes in post #109 are accurate  Commie Pinko Dirtbag   Sep-24-07 06:17 PM   #142 
         You beat me to it.  NaturalHigh   Sep-23-07 12:28 PM   #38 
            Have you read her work?  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 12:35 PM   #42 
               See Post #44.  NaturalHigh   Sep-23-07 12:40 PM   #45 
   i always strive to be deviant.  xchrom   Sep-23-07 09:53 AM   #3 
   (sigh) Man as predator, woman as prey  Warpy   Sep-23-07 09:57 AM   #4 
   And cats aren't predators?  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Sep-23-07 10:10 AM   #8 
   Cats :)  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 11:22 AM   #22 
   It has nothing to do with predation...  Riktor   Sep-23-07 07:55 PM   #84 
   BINGO!!!!!  pink-o   Sep-23-07 09:29 PM   #94 
   Nature Vs. Nurture  Riktor   Sep-24-07 01:20 AM   #110 
      Well, it depends on how much one validates evolution...  pink-o   Sep-24-07 02:25 PM   #126 
         Agreed, but the problem is...  Riktor   Sep-24-07 10:25 PM   #150 
   You said it better than I could  Terran   Sep-24-07 03:00 PM   #129 
      There's a reason feminism tends to ignore biology  Riktor   Sep-24-07 03:39 PM   #134 
         Very interesting  Terran   Sep-24-07 05:28 PM   #139 
            On Pornography  Riktor   Sep-24-07 06:22 PM   #143 
   Ditto. nt  raccoon   Sep-24-07 02:37 PM   #127 
   Indeed  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Sep-23-07 10:03 AM   #5 
   the sexuality of woman is considered irrelevant in society  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 10:12 AM   #10 
      Essentially  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Sep-23-07 10:27 AM   #15 
      yup. unless you are a butch girl in which case you are to be super hated.  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 12:06 PM   #36 
         I've frankly never understood the Butch thing?  whoneedstickets   Sep-24-07 12:02 AM   #107 
         Your confusion is based on some common, but cliched, misconceptions  Der Blaue Engel   Sep-24-07 03:29 AM   #115 
         why is it so necessary for a girl to be girly? some of us are uncomfortable in girliness some of us  lionesspriyanka   Sep-24-07 07:41 AM   #121 
         Right  Terran   Sep-24-07 03:05 PM   #130 
            yes. exactly.  lionesspriyanka   Sep-24-07 03:23 PM   #131 
      Very true. Women's sexual pleasure and womens' sexuality is an afterthought at very best....  Triana   Sep-23-07 11:52 PM   #105 
      I have often thought that if pregnancy  question everything   Sep-24-07 12:09 AM   #108 
   Quite intriguing and familiar from some of my studies.  blonndee   Sep-23-07 10:04 AM   #6 
   Men fear being physically violated. 'Nuff said. nt  MookieWilson   Sep-23-07 10:11 AM   #9 
   bullshit. 'nuff said.  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 10:12 AM   #11 
   Except Those Who Enjoy Penetration, Sir  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 10:15 AM   #12 
   yes, i am sure big huge men beat up young skinny boys/bois because they are hugely afraid of being  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 10:21 AM   #13 
      A Couple Of Things About That, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 10:46 AM   #19 
         which is to say sir, there is no fear of violation, but indeed sir, a desire to dominate  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 11:39 AM   #30 
            Close Enough, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 11:44 AM   #33 
               i think you are wrong sir. studies have proved that there are more difference  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 11:57 AM   #35 
                  We Seem To Be Talking Past One Another, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 12:33 PM   #40 
   They do?  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Sep-23-07 10:25 AM   #14 
   It's perceived violation.  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 11:29 AM   #25 
      And Yet, Ma'am, Some Experience Being Penetrated As Controlling, Even Dominating, The Other  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 11:38 AM   #29 
      but sir pretending that men are violent towards gay men, for self preservation  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 11:41 AM   #31 
         It Is Not Self-Preservation, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 11:49 AM   #34 
            I'm not sure how we disagree?  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 12:31 PM   #39 
               Answering That, Ma'am, Would Depend On What We Were Actually Talking About  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 01:03 PM   #47 
                  I think you are seeing what you want to see, to be honest.  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 03:32 PM   #65 
                     Of Whom Could That Not Be Said, Ma'am?  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 04:04 PM   #70 
                     I'm glad you took the time  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 06:47 PM   #76 
                        No, Sir, No!  Whisp   Sep-23-07 08:38 PM   #90 
                        One more in that group.  lwfern   Sep-23-07 11:11 PM   #100 
                           you said it.!  Whisp   Sep-23-07 11:15 PM   #101 
                           ROTFLMAO! Thank you!  UncleSepp   Sep-24-07 03:55 AM   #118 
                           To each his/her own  question everything   Sep-24-07 04:41 PM   #138 
                              It's no longer a form of respect  lwfern   Sep-24-07 05:55 PM   #140 
                                 Exactly --  Katherine Brengle   Sep-24-07 07:33 PM   #145 
                        The Parenthetical Is Interesting, Ma'am  The Magistrate   Sep-24-07 03:49 AM   #116 
                     But...  Riktor   Sep-24-07 04:27 AM   #119 
                        Sorry, I stopped reading at "evolutionary psychology" - I had to run to the lav and puke.  Katherine Brengle   Sep-24-07 07:35 PM   #146 
                        How Scientific of you  Riktor   Sep-24-07 10:00 PM   #149 
                        This same argument of naturalization of roles  lwfern   Sep-24-07 09:32 PM   #147 
                           Straw Man  Riktor   Sep-24-07 09:58 PM   #148 
                              this argument here:  lwfern   Sep-24-07 11:09 PM   #151 
                                 You confuse "explanation" with "justification"  Riktor   Sep-24-07 11:42 PM   #152 
                                    One issue I have...  Terran   Sep-25-07 10:39 AM   #154 
                                       I can agree with that...  Riktor   Sep-25-07 02:53 PM   #156 
      Exactly  Annces   Sep-23-07 11:42 AM   #32 
      This post is at the heart of it.  lwfern   Sep-23-07 01:44 PM   #55 
         Well said.  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 03:34 PM   #66 
   I think it's bigger than that --  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 11:25 AM   #24 
   they fear the 'feminine' side of them.  Whisp   Sep-23-07 08:29 PM   #87 
   I disagree that's the major basis of homophobia  ProudToBeBlueInRhody   Sep-23-07 10:58 PM   #99 
   I don't know when it was written, but I'm sure the writer would be happy to see sodomy laws..  aikoaiko   Sep-23-07 10:27 AM   #16 
   interesting read the responses so far.  xchrom   Sep-23-07 10:34 AM   #18 
   Interesting theories, indeed. Thank you for a thoughtful and  Glorfindel   Sep-23-07 10:56 AM   #20 
   Collaboration -- sometimes playing along is the easiest way to survive  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 11:32 AM   #27 
   Very interesting  Annces   Sep-23-07 11:10 AM   #21 
   Let me guess: Dworkinism.  NaturalHigh   Sep-23-07 12:26 PM   #37 
   Have you actually read her work?  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 12:33 PM   #41 
   Yes, I've read her work.  NaturalHigh   Sep-23-07 12:37 PM   #44 
      Hatred for what exactly?  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 03:25 PM   #63 
         Men.  NaturalHigh   Sep-24-07 10:56 AM   #123 
   Oh please  gaspee   Sep-23-07 07:29 PM   #81 
   Is this the revolutionary side of the revolutionary/work-in- the-system feminism divide?  BlooInBloo   Sep-23-07 12:36 PM   #43 
   This is the true origin of the word homophobia.  Wcross   Sep-23-07 12:43 PM   #46 
   True Enough, Sir: It Is a Clumsy, And None To Apt, Coinage  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 01:09 PM   #49 
   I hope this doesn't make me a "homophobe".  Wcross   Sep-23-07 01:16 PM   #53 
   how uncomfortable would you feel being a woman/girl  Whisp   Sep-23-07 08:49 PM   #91 
   true enough -- but he does make a very good point --  xchrom   Sep-23-07 03:36 PM   #68 
      I have known true homophobes.  Wcross   Sep-23-07 06:49 PM   #77 
         indeed -- i personally think that it's very important to not that  xchrom   Sep-23-07 07:02 PM   #78 
   Thanks for the link.  NaturalHigh   Sep-23-07 01:11 PM   #51 
   Semantics,  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 03:35 PM   #67 
   Why do those people consider heterosexuality "natural"?  94114_San_Francisco   Sep-23-07 05:02 PM   #72 
   I apologise.  Wcross   Sep-23-07 07:06 PM   #79 
   No apology necessary.  94114_San_Francisco   Sep-23-07 09:27 PM   #93 
   Of couse it's not unnatural  gaspee   Sep-23-07 07:41 PM   #82 
   I think I understand your point.  94114_San_Francisco   Sep-24-07 02:10 AM   #112 
   Unnatural, Definition Of  Raejeanowl   Sep-23-07 10:19 PM   #97 
      Huh?  gollygee   Sep-23-07 10:34 PM   #98 
      No  Raejeanowl   Sep-23-07 11:42 PM   #103 
         How do you explain homosexuality in nature?  Bornaginhooligan   Sep-24-07 03:32 PM   #133 
      I'd say your definition of "natural" behavior is far more narrow than mine.  94114_San_Francisco   Sep-24-07 02:22 AM   #113 
      Considering homosexuality shows up in many species, not just human, I would consider it natural  LostinVA   Sep-25-07 12:32 AM   #153 
   "They find it unnatural" - a mild form of fear.  Hissyspit   Sep-23-07 06:44 PM   #75 
      I couldn't agree more.  94114_San_Francisco   Sep-24-07 02:34 AM   #114 
   So the primary problem is the subjugation of women.  undeterred   Sep-23-07 01:04 PM   #48 
   i think the problem is how you view femininity  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 02:33 PM   #58 
      Different, but equal.  undeterred   Sep-23-07 02:39 PM   #59 
         sort of and whether you think its necessary for a male to be masculine and a women feminine  lionesspriyanka   Sep-23-07 02:41 PM   #60 
         well, masculine and feminine are more flexible to me  undeterred   Sep-23-07 02:59 PM   #61 
         "Different"  Katherine Brengle   Sep-23-07 03:38 PM   #69 
   Prior To Lawrence V Texas Some State's Sodomy Laws Applied To Men And Women...  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-23-07 01:10 PM   #50 
   Yes. The OT laws were about maintaining a labor force  Jed Dilligan   Sep-23-07 01:24 PM   #54 
      Right  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-23-07 01:53 PM   #56 
   This leaves out a lot of cultures that have  Jed Dilligan   Sep-23-07 01:12 PM   #52 
   That's sounds about right to me!  Joanne98   Sep-23-07 01:57 PM   #57 
   Don't forget the eunuchs...  Baby Snooks   Sep-23-07 03:04 PM   #62 
   jesus and the people in israel at that time were fully acquainted with  xchrom   Sep-23-07 03:31 PM   #64 
      It Is True, Sir, That Mention Of Homosexuality Is Absent From the Gospels  The Magistrate   Sep-23-07 04:11 PM   #71 
         as a christian -- paul is difficult for me --  xchrom   Sep-23-07 06:31 PM   #74 
            Paul met the spirit Christ on the road to Damascus  blogslut   Sep-23-07 07:46 PM   #83 
            Not Being Christian Myself, Sir  The Magistrate   Sep-24-07 03:53 AM   #117 
               i don't entirely disagree with your quote about truth and religion.  xchrom   Sep-24-07 10:22 AM   #122 
   I agree  Nikia   Sep-23-07 05:20 PM   #73 
   Sounds like Andrea Dworkin. (eom)  tblue37   Sep-23-07 07:17 PM   #80 
   Whomever Wrote This Was Coming At it From the Wrong Direction, IMO  Crisco   Sep-23-07 08:02 PM   #85 
   the term 'fuck you' is used  Whisp   Sep-23-07 08:18 PM   #86 
   That's a REALLY good comment. nt  MookieWilson   Sep-23-07 09:56 PM   #95 
      f u = aggression  Whisp   Sep-23-07 11:33 PM   #102 
   It's "Funny" That Norman Mailer Is Mentioned In The OP  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-23-07 08:33 PM   #88 
   Outdated and largely irrelevant  cgrindley   Sep-23-07 08:36 PM   #89 
   This argument provides an explanation as to why  undeterred   Sep-23-07 09:19 PM   #92 
   Seen on a bumper sticker:  OxQQme   Sep-23-07 10:06 PM   #96 
   Also the origin of abusive relationships - whose primary objective is for one person...  Triana   Sep-23-07 11:46 PM   #104 
   Which is why some feminists  question everything   Sep-23-07 11:57 PM   #106 
   Oh, goody. Another anti-sex screed from the "brilliant" Dworkin, disguised as "social commentary".  impeachdubya   Sep-24-07 12:24 AM   #109 
   A member of my family fought and won a prolonged battle with Dworkin over the inclusion of TG rights  ConsAreLiars   Sep-24-07 01:48 AM   #111 
      Just look at her background  Riktor   Sep-24-07 04:43 AM   #120 
      "She is a seriously deformed and hate-filled being"...  NaturalHigh   Sep-24-07 11:00 AM   #124 
   For anyone who wants to read...  NaturalHigh   Sep-24-07 11:05 AM   #125 
   Ironic that Dworkin should be mentioned here  booley   Sep-24-07 03:44 PM   #135 
   The laws that Dworkin and Catharine MacKinnon tried to get passed...  NaturalHigh   Sep-25-07 01:02 PM   #155 
   Wasn't Dworkin herself a homophobe?  Bornaginhooligan   Sep-24-07 04:34 PM   #136 
   Did She Really Say That?  DemocratSinceBirth   Sep-24-07 04:36 PM   #137 
   She tends to draw her conclusions far beyond what her evidence supports.  bemildred   Sep-24-07 06:06 PM   #141 
   Anyone who reads more into sex being more than a love and "friction" exersice...  LeftHander   Sep-24-07 06:43 PM   #144 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC