| -If you think Hillary Clinton can't win a general election, |
cali |
Sep-16-07 07:48 AM |
#0 |
 -
HRC is poison to the Democratic Party, IMO, as Nominee in the general election. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 07:54 AM |
#1 |
 -
Another CFAP |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:02 AM |
#4 |
 -
You're excellent at bashing anyone who disagrees with you, but the truth is The BASE won't vote for |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:06 AM |
#11 |
| -
LOL. For a fine example of bashing, read your own 1st post in |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:14 AM |
#18 |
| -
Who Appointed You God And Voice Of The Base |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:22 AM |
# |
| -
No one, but I qualified it as my personal opinion. Often times I just happen to be correct. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:30 AM |
#34 |
| -
You know The Old Saw About Opinions |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:37 AM |
#43 |
| -
Very insightful. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:56 AM |
#60 |
| -
self-delete |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:31 AM |
#36 |
| -
I'll vote for Hillary |
emilyg |
Sep-16-07 01:01 PM |
#230 |
| -
Nonsense |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 08:27 AM |
#27 |
| -
As opposed to blind support for her and the party |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:11 AM |
#172 |
| -
So who will you vote for, IF she does get the nomination? |
hlthe2b |
Sep-16-07 08:37 AM |
#44 |
| -
I agree totally, ShortnFiery |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:00 AM |
#64 |
| -
how about |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:07 AM |
#67 |
| -
means squat |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:14 AM |
#74 |
| -
If you don't want to learn |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:17 AM |
#79 |
| -
Once again |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:25 AM |
#92 |
| -
LOL |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:31 AM |
#102 |
| -
BECAUSE OF THE WAR |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:48 AM |
#130 |
| -
Well you'll be happy to know |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:49 AM |
#131 |
| -
Too little, too late |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 10:12 AM |
#173 |
| -
Well, a pro-choice president is important to many of us |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:18 AM |
#81 |
| -
Seems to me that some repuke appointments |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:28 AM |
#97 |
| -
That will never happen again. NEVER. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:40 AM |
#118 |
| -
Then I guess "pro-choice" will extend to "choice for endless occupations" ? nt |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:29 AM |
#99 |
| -
What? Really, try thinking. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:41 AM |
#120 |
| -
All those billions we are pouring into the War Machine are not representative of Pro-Life values |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:15 AM |
#177 |
| -
oh, so true |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 10:22 AM |
#191 |
| -
The problem is that we need to throw out corporate power! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:20 AM |
#185 |
| -
She HAS done one thing that disqualifies her as a Democrat in my opinion. |
reprobate |
Sep-16-07 02:04 PM |
#234 |
| -
If she is nominated I will quit the party |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 09:49 AM |
#132 |
| -
Go for it. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:56 AM |
#143 |
| -
Show me where I said I wouldn't vote for her |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#166 |
| -
I didn't say you did; I said "if" |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:10 AM |
#170 |
| -
good |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:58 AM |
#147 |
| -
Show me where I said I would quit DU |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:08 AM |
#167 |
| -
well |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:20 AM |
#187 |
| -
Why would I have to stay silent? |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:36 AM |
# |
| -
Well, I THOUGHT this was a Democratic Party member site! |
CTyankee |
Sep-16-07 07:21 PM |
#260 |
| -
Membership in the Democratic party is not required to participate here |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:47 PM |
#267 |
| -
Did I say anything about NOT questioning leaders? As a matter of fact, I strongly |
CTyankee |
Sep-17-07 08:20 AM |
#269 |
| -
This site does not prohibit questioning Democratic leaders |
proud2Blib |
Sep-17-07 10:20 AM |
#270 |
| -
Of course you can go on DU and question Democrats. I wouldn't be here if |
CTyankee |
Sep-17-07 10:43 AM |
#271 |
| -
I have no plans to advocate for other candidates here |
proud2Blib |
Sep-17-07 11:43 AM |
#272 |
| -
not to mention |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#161 |
| -
YEP you get it |
proud2Blib |
Sep-16-07 10:09 AM |
#168 |
| -
The 'poison' is in the advancement of republicans |
bigtree |
Sep-16-07 08:03 AM |
#6 |
| -
The REAL poison is the adancement of corporocrats! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:28 AM |
#196 |
| -
Don't trust Hillary but she can take the first round of hits and then we'll |
jazzjunkysue |
Sep-16-07 08:00 AM |
#2 |
| -
Forgive me if I do NOT want an American Margaret Thatcher. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:02 AM |
#5 |
| -
Well said! |
ThomWV |
Sep-16-07 08:20 AM |
#21 |
| -
She won't win. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 09:21 AM |
# |
| -
yes yes and yes |
rodeodance |
Sep-16-07 08:03 AM |
#8 |
| -
OK, you can't stand Hillary |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:06 AM |
#9 |
| -
It's much more than that and you know it... |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:08 AM |
#15 |
| -
You're the one using that language. I don't. n/t |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:16 AM |
#20 |
| -
But your actions ... the threads you start to trash ANSWER, et. al. liberal based, speaks volumes. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:21 AM |
#22 |
| -
ANSWER is NOT a liberal group. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:25 AM |
#25 |
| -
Oh please stop with the false outrage. It's opinion, but IMO, you trash all liberal based groups. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:29 AM |
#31 |
| -
It's dogshit. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:36 AM |
#39 |
| -
Typical response: Attack! That will play nicely with the liberal base. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:55 AM |
#58 |
| -
One more time. I am a liberal. I have thousands of posts |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:01 AM |
#65 |
| -
My Gawd! I'm sorry, but the way you "pick apart" liberal groups here, IMO, you are no liberal. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:25 AM |
#91 |
| -
oh bullshit |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:33 AM |
#104 |
| -
Well, I don't know about how many TEAMS you've played on, but if you want to win A GOAL |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:39 AM |
#116 |
| -
Then why do you shit all over clinton every chance you get? |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:46 AM |
#127 |
| -
Nice choice of words. And here I thought we were beginning to get along. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:54 AM |
#138 |
| -
You're tired of MY rudeness? |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:57 AM |
#145 |
| -
Hello? There's a difference between PUBLIC candidates and DU members. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:00 AM |
#149 |
| -
Why are YOU allowed to |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:04 AM |
#155 |
| -
Again, you are grossing me (and others out) ... mission accomplished. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:06 AM |
#160 |
| -
Can't answer the question? |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#165 |
| -
The candidates are fair game - YOU wish to take it personally. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:09 AM |
#169 |
| -
Now try to read slowly.... |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:22 AM |
#190 |
| -
I guess given your rules, you better be careful not to attack Lieberman! He's now a DEMOCRAT! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:37 AM |
#200 |
| -
It's not MY rule |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 11:00 AM |
#210 |
| -
I think he was concerned about attacking other Dem board members... |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 11:17 AM |
#220 |
| -
Now O n c e MORE, I attacked "the behavior" not the person who is cali. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:39 AM |
#202 |
| -
Why is Cali's BEHAVIOR subject to condemnation |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:59 AM |
#209 |
| -
No, I'm only reporting what is there for observation ... on facts - I made no personal insults. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 11:06 AM |
#213 |
| -
You will never get a straight answer |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:09 AM |
#214 |
| -
My guess is that it is more of an issue of priorities in supporting progressive causes |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 01:55 PM |
#232 |
| -
Very thoughtful and more diplomatic than my capabilities. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 02:35 PM |
#239 |
| -
ANSWER does hurt the anti-war movement |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:52 AM |
#135 |
| -
That's simply a big L |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:54 AM |
#137 |
| -
Methinks you protesth way way WAY (all those biting comments) too much. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:55 AM |
#141 |
| -
You have a nice day too. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:02 AM |
#152 |
| -
I never fail to be amazed at how you are able to rise above it all. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:11 AM |
#171 |
| -
Nah, I fall into the muck and wrestle |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:10 AM |
#215 |
| -
Yes, I am fully aware of your elaborated positions. But - I just don't concur. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 02:41 PM |
#241 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-16-07 10:16 AM |
#179 |
| -
I'll say. I don't support people |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:16 AM |
#219 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-16-07 06:52 PM |
#257 |
| -
she is a consumate politician |
wildhorses |
Sep-16-07 08:01 AM |
#3 |
| -
my dog could beat fred thompson and so could hillary |
spanone |
Sep-16-07 08:03 AM |
#7 |
| -
LOL! |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:06 AM |
#12 |
| -
I think she has a shot equal to that of Kerry |
zeemike |
Sep-16-07 08:06 AM |
#10 |
| -
Believe me, the Clinton campaign has been dealing |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:08 AM |
#13 |
| -
Competence doesn't matter when images are created on a tube |
zeemike |
Sep-16-07 08:26 AM |
#26 |
| -
Reagan Ran In An Entirely Different Political Environment |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:36 AM |
#40 |
| -
True Reagan had more experience |
zeemike |
Sep-16-07 08:53 AM |
#56 |
| -
No they can't. He's a deeply flawed candidate |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:57 AM |
#61 |
| -
And He's Not Particulary Attractive |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 10:47 AM |
#205 |
| -
"if they (MSM) want to make Thompson the next Reagan they can do it." |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:58 AM |
#62 |
| -
Exactly! |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:29 AM |
#100 |
| -
That Would Be Like Making Danny DeVito Into Brad Pitt |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 04:14 PM |
#244 |
| -
Exactly..... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:01 AM |
#151 |
| -
Eleanor Roosevelt was vilified and called a lesbian by the media |
katmondoo |
Sep-16-07 08:10 AM |
#16 |
| -
True. But she was not electable on her own. |
PaulHo |
Sep-16-07 09:18 AM |
#82 |
| -
And why won't we look to her for moral |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:05 AM |
#156 |
| -
but on the most important vote |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 10:19 AM |
#183 |
| -
and you know that how? |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:24 AM |
#192 |
| -
Sure she loves him |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:04 PM |
#245 |
| -
That's your opinion but that |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 06:08 PM |
#246 |
| -
But she asaid Yes to NAFTA, No to single payer health,... |
PaulHo |
Sep-16-07 12:03 PM |
#226 |
| -
Excellent points, PaulHo! |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:12 PM |
#249 |
| -
When Hillary Gets Done Working Frederick90027 He'll Wish He Stayed At Law And Order |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:27 AM |
#29 |
| -
Ain't that the truth. n/t |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:29 AM |
#32 |
| -
But you don't get it |
zeemike |
Sep-16-07 08:42 AM |
#47 |
| -
If Folks Think HRC Is Gay There's No Getting Through To Them |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:49 AM |
#52 |
| -
Fooled again, indeed |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:10 AM |
#70 |
| -
"So add on some swft-boating and some black box voting and we are indeed FOOLS AGAIN" |
Scout |
Sep-16-07 01:20 PM |
#231 |
| -
sheesh |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:09 PM |
#247 |
| -
Any Dem is better than any Reptile |
baldguy |
Sep-16-07 08:08 AM |
#14 |
| -
Not if they will continue enabling The Military Industrial Complex to kill our youth and steal ... |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:11 AM |
#17 |
| -
Cliches are no substitute for reasoned arguments n/t |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:15 AM |
#19 |
| -
Cliches that happen to reflect "the truth" are very useful - I repeat often. nt |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:22 AM |
#23 |
| -
I can't help but laugh at anyone who thinks they have the market |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:28 AM |
#30 |
| -
Yes, you love to throw the term "content free" and "laugh at" those who strongly oppose you ... |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:37 AM |
#41 |
| -
There are good |
H2O Man |
Sep-16-07 08:29 AM |
#33 |
| -
Absolutely. And that's why I can't support her in the primaries |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:42 AM |
#48 |
| -
I guess you haven't noticed, LBJ isn't running. |
baldguy |
Sep-16-07 08:38 AM |
#45 |
| -
But LBJ, a DEMOCRATIC president got us into Vietnam and escalated our involvement. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 08:50 AM |
#53 |
| -
The question isn't whether you're going to be loyal to the party or not. |
baldguy |
Sep-16-07 09:29 AM |
#98 |
| -
Newsflash, HRC has been invited to several think tanks: Only Impeachment will wrest the UNITARY |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:34 AM |
#106 |
| -
A "sane Republican"? Where is this mythical beast? |
baldguy |
Sep-16-07 10:21 AM |
#188 |
| -
The Pugs Got a Twofer |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:45 AM |
#51 |
| -
Touche and exactly, ShortnFiery |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:25 AM |
#90 |
| -
Say what? |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:35 AM |
#110 |
| -
Clinton isn't remotely comparable Zell Miller |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:58 AM |
#146 |
| -
Did Zell Miller And Ben Nighthorse Campbell Get 95% ADA Ratings? |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:43 AM |
#123 |
| -
like really slow fish |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:48 AM |
#129 |
| -
that's for sure |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:03 AM |
#154 |
| -
Lieberman's back to being a DINO again... |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:47 AM |
#204 |
| -
I agree... |
PCIntern |
Sep-16-07 08:24 AM |
#24 |
| -
People will of had enough by 08 it's the perfect time for her to win. |
cooolandrew |
Sep-16-07 08:27 AM |
#28 |
| -
What makes you think Thompson is going to win the republican nomination? |
porphyrian |
Sep-16-07 08:31 AM |
#35 |
| -
I don't know if he will. I used Fred and Rudi as the |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:37 AM |
#42 |
| -
It's all guesswork until the primaries, unless someone knows something I don't. |
porphyrian |
Sep-16-07 08:42 AM |
#46 |
| -
My OP was not about cheering Hillary on, it was simply |
cali |
Sep-16-07 08:44 AM |
#50 |
| -
And my original post simply disagreed with your conclusion. |
porphyrian |
Sep-16-07 08:53 AM |
#54 |
| -
I think she's the only Dem candidate the Repukes can destroy |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 08:32 AM |
#37 |
| -
McCain fans said that about Jr. in 2000... |
PCIntern |
Sep-16-07 08:34 AM |
#38 |
| -
In My Best Arnold Voice From Twins |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:43 AM |
#49 |
| -
But Jr had the NAME |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 09:39 AM |
#115 |
| -
She and her husband have this annoying habit |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 08:53 AM |
#55 |
| -
Affirmative |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:55 AM |
#57 |
| -
He did because he's a powerhouse of charm and right wing anyway...... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 09:17 AM |
#78 |
| -
Bill Clinton is not right-wing |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:18 AM |
#80 |
| -
Huh? NAFTA is not right wing? We can go down a list of right wing |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 09:23 AM |
#88 |
| -
Bill clinton is not right-wing |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:33 AM |
#105 |
| -
NAFTA was signed by Bush41 - not Clinton - and while the side agreements did not work it |
papau |
Sep-16-07 12:21 PM |
#229 |
| -
This is what Wikipedia says about Clinton and trade agreements and NAFTA |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 07:36 PM |
#261 |
| -
Thanks for the heads up - I'll go over and correct the entry - it appears that the "Clinton |
papau |
Sep-16-07 09:04 PM |
#265 |
| -
Bill wouldn't have been elected without Ross Perot in 1992. |
Major Hogwash |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#162 |
| -
Where's The Evidence That Every Perot Voter Would Have Voted For Bush? |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 10:13 AM |
#175 |
| -
nonsense |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:27 AM |
#195 |
| -
Some Posters Must Think Other Posters Just Fell Off The Turnip Truck |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 10:34 AM |
#198 |
| -
I used an almanac to get my facts for all those votes for Perot. |
Major Hogwash |
Sep-16-07 07:36 PM |
#262 |
| -
Horse hockey |
Major Hogwash |
Sep-16-07 07:39 PM |
#263 |
| -
She isn't such a sure thing as you claim |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 08:56 AM |
#59 |
| -
Then Why Is She Waxing G(h)ouliani And Fredrick90027 In The Polls? |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 08:59 AM |
#63 |
| -
Why are believing anything that a poll tells you over a year out from the election? |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:09 AM |
#69 |
| -
Why are polls that show something now |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:16 AM |
#77 |
| -
Because you know as well as I do that polls right now don't reflect sentiment come next fall |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:27 AM |
#95 |
| -
polls right now |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:35 AM |
#109 |
| -
Speaking of vehemence, geez, pot, meet kettle |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:42 AM |
#122 |
| -
Where's the objectivity? |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:02 AM |
#153 |
| -
Sounds like Adrian In The Rocky Movies |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#164 |
| -
I have never seen such a weak slate of candidates as |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:04 AM |
#66 |
| -
Don't underestimate Thompson |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:13 AM |
#73 |
| -
I don't think people will vote for an old guy with cancer |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:15 AM |
#75 |
| -
That could very well be his undoing |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:23 AM |
#89 |
| -
Figure Out The Logistics And The Legality |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:36 AM |
#113 |
| -
Being that I don't know where you live |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:45 AM |
#126 |
| -
I Haven't Picked A Loser Since I Started Picking In 76... |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:54 AM |
#139 |
| -
What Reagan Dynamic? |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:23 AM |
#87 |
| -
You apparently don't deal with many people out in flyover country |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:31 AM |
#103 |
| -
Besides The Obvious Physical Differences |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:52 AM |
#136 |
| -
and it was weak in 2000 |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 10:27 AM |
#194 |
| -
so we should nominate somebody |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:08 AM |
#68 |
| -
Like Him |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:12 AM |
#71 |
| -
Do you read posts for comprehension, or just to get in the first snark? |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:16 AM |
#76 |
| -
well I don't give |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 09:19 AM |
#83 |
| -
Yeah, but what plays in New York doesn't always play well out here in flyover country |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:34 AM |
#108 |
| -
Do you know much about upstate New York? |
MonkeyFunk |
Sep-16-07 10:00 AM |
#150 |
| -
she also didn't have much |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:26 PM |
#252 |
| -
So true, Madhound |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:20 PM |
#250 |
| -
Why not read the OP BEFORE commenting. I never said she was a sure thing |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:12 AM |
#72 |
| -
No, but you have certainly implied that, both in your OP and elsewhere on this board |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:21 AM |
#86 |
| -
With so many right wingers and all the corporations backing her financially |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 09:19 AM |
#84 |
| -
And many of us DON'T see her as the best candidate |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:21 AM |
#85 |
| -
She isn't, but even if she were...... |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 09:26 AM |
#93 |
| -
Just let me ask one question: |
cali |
Sep-16-07 09:28 AM |
#96 |
| -
OF COURSE! I've never voted for anything but Dems. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 07:11 PM |
#258 |
| -
I think the country is ripe |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:20 AM |
#186 |
| -
the right woman |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:21 PM |
#251 |
| -
In your opinion..... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 06:36 PM |
#255 |
| -
The country might NEED a woman president, but this country is SEXIST. |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-16-07 07:17 PM |
#259 |
| -
I don't need to do a search on sexism..... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:12 PM |
#266 |
| -
Not in the primaries she won't. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Sep-17-07 06:35 PM |
#275 |
| -
"a woman presidential candidate |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:34 PM |
#253 |
| -
Anecdotally , I Don't Know One Democrat In Real Life Who Won't Vote For Hillary |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:27 AM |
#94 |
| -
I respectfully suggest - you may need to get out more? |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:30 AM |
#101 |
| -
I Get Out Plenty... |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:40 AM |
#117 |
| -
OK |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:44 AM |
#124 |
| -
ditto, SnF |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:36 PM |
#254 |
| -
Anecdotally I know many Dems who won't vote for her in the general |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:38 AM |
#114 |
| -
They said the same thing about Kerry. How'd that work out? |
Major Hogwash |
Sep-16-07 09:34 AM |
#107 |
| -
Impeachment of Cheney may be the only chance we have to stop "The Unitary Executive" |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:36 AM |
#112 |
| -
Are you suggesting that the Democrats are agreeing to let Bush make the Presidency this strong? |
Major Hogwash |
Sep-16-07 09:41 AM |
#119 |
| -
No, I'm suggesting that some in the military industrial complex - think tanks |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:47 AM |
#128 |
| -
If war profiteering is important |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:17 AM |
#181 |
| -
ENDING this war is *all* important ... HRC will not help us with that. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:21 AM |
#189 |
| -
Sad to say, I thought the same thing |
deutsey |
Sep-16-07 09:42 AM |
#121 |
| -
Excellent points, deutsey |
Carolina |
Sep-16-07 06:10 PM |
#248 |
| -
Unfortunately, you're probably right. She's a "smart" (aka unethical) politician. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Sep-16-07 09:35 AM |
#111 |
| -
Posts like this ignore Hillary's secret weapon. |
tinrobot |
Sep-16-07 09:44 AM |
#125 |
| -
Yes, he'll be a big factor, including all that bagge that he brings along with him |
MadHound |
Sep-16-07 09:49 AM |
#133 |
| -
Yeah-Bill's A Liability |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 10:05 AM |
#157 |
| -
The Big Dawg is no longer "the star" that he was - not here, not now. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 09:51 AM |
#134 |
| -
I Am Amazed At Your Ability To Present Your Opinion As Fact |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 09:56 AM |
#144 |
| -
Fascinating, isn't it? |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:06 AM |
#159 |
| -
Oh my, ganging up? What would mother say? |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:13 AM |
#174 |
| -
My mother's a tough old bird |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:14 AM |
#176 |
| -
My mother's also tough, but she always told me to attack the argument, not the person. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:20 AM |
#184 |
| -
Too bad you didn't take her words to heart. |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:32 AM |
#197 |
| -
Seriously, you are so taken by HRC, any criticism of her you seemingly take personally. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 10:36 AM |
#199 |
| -
Why are you so enamoured of putting words in my mouth? I do not support HRC |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:49 AM |
#206 |
| -
What I find most disturbing is the demonstrated "big D" democratic behavior you are espousing. |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 11:13 AM |
#218 |
| -
You have insulted me repeatedly and tried to silence me on more |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:22 AM |
#222 |
| -
Oh please, that's patently false - you know that I'm asking you to with-hold harsh judgments about |
ShortnFiery |
Sep-16-07 11:36 AM |
#225 |
| -
You're right, the economy was strong under Clinton. |
tinrobot |
Sep-16-07 12:10 PM |
#227 |
| -
That's a valid point. n/t |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:07 AM |
#163 |
| -
Winning in 08 isn't something we can settle for "an excellent shot at." |
LibDemAlways |
Sep-16-07 09:55 AM |
#140 |
| -
I agree that she's not the best candidate |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:05 AM |
#158 |
| -
Your post is very straightforward, and I don't disagree |
LibDemAlways |
Sep-16-07 10:16 AM |
#178 |
| -
I'm not a fan of Hillary but lets remember the Supreme Court shall we? Anyone she appoints would be |
newportdadde |
Sep-16-07 09:56 AM |
#142 |
| -
I want someone who will end "corporate personhood" on the court! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:55 AM |
#207 |
| -
I'm not a gambler or otherwise |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-16-07 10:00 AM |
#148 |
| -
win, schmin.........what will be the margin? will the country still be divided? will she represent... |
Ninga |
Sep-16-07 10:16 AM |
#180 |
| -
I have three little words for you: |
cali |
Sep-16-07 10:18 AM |
#182 |
| -
My car will be pasted with Hillary bumper stickers and I will support her if she is the nominee. |
Ninga |
Sep-16-07 10:27 AM |
#193 |
| -
And two words back for that issue "Corporate Personhood"! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 10:56 AM |
#208 |
| -
Sorry, opposed as I am to Corporate Personhood |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:00 AM |
#211 |
| -
Right now we should be FOCUSED on who wins the primary! |
calipendence |
Sep-16-07 11:12 AM |
#217 |
| -
I disagree and wish she would go away |
GoPsUx |
Sep-16-07 10:39 AM |
#201 |
| -
Keep telling yourself that... |
Beelzebud |
Sep-16-07 10:40 AM |
#203 |
| -
She's the only one that *could* lose. |
Marr |
Sep-16-07 11:03 AM |
#212 |
| -
You're right |
notsodumbhillbilly |
Sep-16-07 11:34 AM |
#224 |
| -
Then Why Is She Waxing G(h)ouliani And Fredrick90027 In The Polls? |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Sep-16-07 01:57 PM |
#233 |
| -
I agree. nt |
krabigirl |
Sep-16-07 11:11 AM |
#216 |
| -
Can we blame Nader when she loses? |
Beelzebud |
Sep-16-07 11:18 AM |
#221 |
| -
Nope. n/t |
cali |
Sep-16-07 11:23 AM |
#223 |
| -
My problem isn't that I |
zidzi |
Sep-16-07 12:13 PM |
#228 |
| -
Even if by some chance the Republican nominee implodes |
depakid |
Sep-16-07 02:12 PM |
#235 |
| -
Again, and it was right in the OP |
cali |
Sep-16-07 02:40 PM |
#240 |
| -
The issue for me REALLY is not |
never_get_over_it |
Sep-16-07 02:21 PM |
#236 |
| -
Hillary is not my first choice or even my second or third. |
MiltonF |
Sep-16-07 02:28 PM |
#237 |
| -
It's not that. DUers would RATHER a republican win than Clinton. They hate her that much. |
BlooInBloo |
Sep-16-07 02:29 PM |
#238 |
| -
Black and white thinkers |
goodgd_yall |
Sep-16-07 03:37 PM |
#242 |
| -
That's why it's funny watching the cognitive dissonance with Clark. LOL! |
BlooInBloo |
Sep-16-07 03:39 PM |
#243 |
| -
Not necessarily the thinking that's black and white, it's the principles that are |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-16-07 07:43 PM |
#264 |
| -
I believe Obama can easily defeat any of what the GOP have to offer with no difficulties whatsoever. |
Imagevision |
Sep-16-07 06:40 PM |
#256 |
| -
Sadly, you're right. She could win - and little would change. |
Zhade |
Sep-16-07 11:20 PM |
#268 |
| -
Oh - I fully expect Thompson to thump her like a drum. |
Clark2008 |
Sep-17-07 11:50 AM |
#273 |
| -
She's still our weakest candidate because she energizes their base. |
redqueen |
Sep-17-07 11:52 AM |
#274 |
| -
I don't neceassrily think she can't. But I see the republicans |
mmonk |
Sep-17-07 07:23 PM |
#276 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore