NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
|
Wed Sep-12-07 08:31 AM
Original message |
| Poll question: Gen. David Petraeus is a war criminal |
 |
|
Gen. David Petraeus is a war criminal |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 08:31 AM |
#0 |

he is just another flea on the windshield of * and cheney |
alyce douglas |
Sep-12-07 08:33 AM |
#1 |

Are the soldiers in Iraq who still believe they can help war criminals too? |
ProSense |
Sep-12-07 08:34 AM |
#2 |
 
beTreyUS wants to continue to kill innocent Iraqi's |
madokie |
Sep-12-07 08:37 AM |
#3 |
  
That's not how you spell BeTray |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 08:51 AM |
#6 |
   
in your world maybe but not in mine |
madokie |
Sep-12-07 08:53 AM |
#7 |
    
You aren't allowed to make up your own spellings. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 12:00 PM |
#59 |
   
You aren't allowed to act as though you are somebody's mother |
me b zola |
Sep-12-07 02:26 PM |
#81 |
   
I don't know what you are talking about |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 03:25 PM |
#87 |
   
Okie-dokie |
me b zola |
Sep-12-07 05:57 PM |
#99 |
   
childish insults? |
Juniperx |
Sep-12-07 03:30 PM |
#90 |
  
Telling someone they're being childish is not, in and of itself, childish. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 07:56 PM |
#103 |
  
Read again... I said it was insulting... |
Juniperx |
Sep-13-07 03:16 PM |
#107 |
  
Why don't you just call him General Poopiehead? |
cali |
Sep-12-07 09:12 AM |
#20 |
   
knock yourself out |
madokie |
Sep-12-07 09:29 AM |
#32 |
  
yes, let me insult you... |
Juniperx |
Sep-12-07 03:33 PM |
#91 |
  
How do you know that? |
ProSense |
Sep-12-07 12:54 PM |
#70 |
 
Petraeus lied to help Bush start the war. He is complicit. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 08:38 AM |
#4 |
  
show me the proof of that false accusation |
Netbeavis |
Sep-12-07 09:00 AM |
#10 |
 
My pleasure. |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:04 AM |
#13 |
 
That's not proof that he lied to start the war |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:07 AM |
#16 |
  
Really? Whatcha got, Bryant? Fork it over! |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:10 AM |
#19 |
 
I'd have to go back and look it up - Glenn Greenwald had |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:17 AM |
#24 |
 
Thanks! I just saw him on BookTv. He was really compelling. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:20 AM |
#28 |
 
it still doesn't show that he was directy involved in the lead up |
Netbeavis |
Sep-12-07 09:20 AM |
#26 |
 
I have no stake in tarring anyone. Finally, you have to make |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:22 AM |
#29 |
 
agreed. His hands are not completely clean. |
Netbeavis |
Sep-12-07 09:49 AM |
#42 |
 
Ask that question to the families of those Iraqis he has helped to murder if this is over the top |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 08:44 AM |
#5 |
  
Has General Petraeus ordered the murder of innocent Iraqi civilians? |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 08:54 AM |
#8 |
   
Well seeing the Iraqis never attacked us aren't they all innocent? |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 08:58 AM |
#9 |
  
Ah - so in your opinion an Iraqi shooting at American Troops right now |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:01 AM |
#11 |
  
So, if a burglar/rapist invades your home and you shoot at him and then |
Dhalgren |
Sep-12-07 09:07 AM |
#17 |
   
That's not a great analogy |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:23 AM |
#30 |
  
Ok, so the burglar/rapist is a member of a gang and was ordered |
Dhalgren |
Sep-12-07 09:35 AM |
#37 |
  
Fair enough - so you want to see US Gang Members who happen |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 12:57 PM |
#71 |
  
"Want to"? No, don't be stupid. But I will not deny the Iraqis the right |
Dhalgren |
Sep-12-07 03:18 PM |
#85 |
  
Laughs - in other words you hope i stop asking you annoying questions n/t |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 03:24 PM |
#86 |
  
I doubt that there is much chance of that... |
Dhalgren |
Sep-12-07 03:28 PM |
#89 |
  
In the absence of a valid reason for invading and occupying Iraq I say yes they are all innocent |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 09:09 AM |
#18 |
   
So the moral thing for an American soldier to do is either desert |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:14 AM |
#22 |
  
Funny you asked that question because I was almost faced with that dilemma |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 09:28 AM |
#31 |
   
So you would have gone to jail? Or fled north or what? |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:31 AM |
#33 |
    
I updated my post just as you posted |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 09:33 AM |
#36 |
   
So you would advise our troops to get killed |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:37 AM |
#38 |
   
I am explaining how I felt had I been drafted |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 09:39 AM |
#39 |
   
Yep - all our soldiers are choosing to be murderers. |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 09:43 AM |
#40 |
   
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Sep-12-07 09:47 AM |
#41 |
   
Sad to say |
conscious evolution |
Sep-12-07 10:25 AM |
#46 |
   
My first husband was in that class, too, or maybe just ahead of you. |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:54 AM |
#43 |
  
Desert. Go home. |
txaslftist |
Sep-12-07 12:01 PM |
#60 |
  
And if they choose to stay and not desert they are complicit in Bush's war crimes? n/t |
bryant69 |
Sep-12-07 01:00 PM |
#72 |
  
Depends on what they do. |
txaslftist |
Sep-12-07 01:43 PM |
#79 |
  
I would be doing the same thing he is doing and you would prolly be too |
madokie |
Sep-12-07 09:31 AM |
#34 |
  
How about the Iraqis who are still asking for Americans to stay? |
ProSense |
Sep-12-07 12:52 PM |
#69 |
 
So if we were invaded and some Americans collaborated with them that would be the end of it for you? |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 01:04 PM |
#73 |
 
Not all American soldiers are war criminals |
cgrindley |
Sep-12-07 09:06 AM |
#15 |
 
Yes |
atreides1 |
Sep-12-07 09:17 AM |
#23 |
  
I mostly agree, but a historic point-- |
Jed Dilligan |
Sep-12-07 11:09 AM |
#50 |
 
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-12-07 11:45 AM |
#53 |
 
Maybe. Depends on each one's role. |
txaslftist |
Sep-12-07 11:52 AM |
#56 |

Knowingly prosecuting an illegal war = war criminal |
cgrindley |
Sep-12-07 09:04 AM |
#12 |

A REAL investigation and trial are warranted... |
Junkdrawer |
Sep-12-07 09:05 AM |
#14 |

Yes |
baldguy |
Sep-12-07 09:13 AM |
#21 |

The difficulty in answering this question is that we want to respect |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 09:19 AM |
#25 |

no. nt. |
IndianaJones |
Sep-12-07 09:20 AM |
#27 |

Absolutely |
BushOut06 |
Sep-12-07 09:32 AM |
#35 |

No. |
TheUniverse |
Sep-12-07 10:03 AM |
#44 |
 
Much lower ranking and so less powerful people have refused |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 10:05 AM |
#45 |
 
"He is just following orders" - where have we heard that before? |
BushOut06 |
Sep-12-07 11:03 AM |
#48 |
  
Sorry, But General Petreaus didn't pull the lever on any gas chambers. |
TheUniverse |
Sep-12-07 11:15 AM |
#51 |
 
is that because only a million or so Iraqis have been killed... |
mike_c |
Sep-12-07 11:51 AM |
#55 |
 
So as long as they're not sending Iraqis into gas ovens, it's not a war crime? |
BushOut06 |
Sep-12-07 01:43 PM |
#78 |
 
LOL |
Bornaginhooligan |
Sep-12-07 11:57 AM |
#57 |

All war is crime. |
mdmc |
Sep-12-07 10:26 AM |
#47 |
 
Yep. And that's why the military has to surround itself with ritual |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 11:08 AM |
#49 |

Peace and low stress |
mdmc |
Sep-12-07 11:50 AM |
#54 |

He's the driver of the getaway humvee.... |
rateyes |
Sep-12-07 11:33 AM |
#52 |

Petraeus has not committed any war crimes. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 11:59 AM |
#58 |
 
he is orchestrating a war of aggression, the ultimate war crime.... |
mike_c |
Sep-12-07 12:12 PM |
#61 |
  
Your definition of "crime against humanity" |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 12:18 PM |
#62 |
 
unprecedented? |
mike_c |
Sep-12-07 12:29 PM |
#65 |
 
Neither apply. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 01:18 PM |
#76 |
 
the Nuremberg Principles include "waging" a war of aggression.... |
mike_c |
Sep-12-07 02:13 PM |
#80 |
 
This is not a war any longer. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 02:51 PM |
#84 |
 
He's ending postwar instability by arming militias? |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 03:26 PM |
#88 |
 
Stupid ain't criminal. n/t |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 03:49 PM |
#92 |
 
Because we know that those militias never kill innocents. |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 03:50 PM |
#93 |
 
Arming a local-defense militia is not a war crime either, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 03:55 PM |
#94 |
 
Yeah, REGARDLESS of the death and destruction. |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 03:57 PM |
#95 |
 
Pretty much, yes. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 04:00 PM |
#96 |
 
He is a criminal. And frankly, your attempt to sanitize him |
sfexpat2000 |
Sep-12-07 04:03 PM |
#97 |
 
I would think that were he a criminal, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 07:49 PM |
#100 |
 
Remember the battalions of Iraqi conscripts who were killed in the first days of Shock and Awe? |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 12:19 PM |
#63 |

I was unaware that killing enemy soldiers during war was a war crime. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 12:22 PM |
#64 |

Those conscripts weren't the enemy of anyone as we now know |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 12:32 PM |
#66 |

Yes, I obviously understand. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 01:20 PM |
#77 |

You switched from "enemy" to "combatants" on me |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 02:28 PM |
#82 |

Combatants. Enemy soldiers. Same thing here. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 02:44 PM |
#83 |

Good, I'm glad we got past that. Now to my original question above |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 04:14 PM |
#98 |

In the context of a war zone, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-12-07 07:54 PM |
#102 |

These Iraqi conscripts were never given the option of standing down |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 09:25 PM |
#104 |

Yes, they were. |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-13-07 12:10 AM |
#106 |

What is the basis for calling General Petraeus a war criminal? |
whistle |
Sep-12-07 12:33 PM |
#67 |

nvem |
Flabbergasted |
Sep-12-07 12:37 PM |
#68 |

EVERYBODY at the top is a war criminal |
lynyrd_skynyrd |
Sep-12-07 01:06 PM |
#74 |
 
No disagreement there |
NNN0LHI |
Sep-12-07 01:09 PM |
#75 |

No he's not, he's a |
ProSense |
Sep-12-07 07:52 PM |
#101 |

Please DU the above poll!!! |
Nimrod2005 |
Sep-12-07 09:40 PM |
#105 |