renie408
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-04-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
| 35. Yeah, but do they know what it means?? n/t |
| -It is only a small step from mandatory urine tests to mandatory checkups.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 11:00 AM |
#0 |
 -
This is like the fifth time I've seen this bit of silliness... |
iamahaingttta |
Sep-04-07 11:37 AM |
#1 |
  -
Indeed ... |
Drifter |
Sep-04-07 12:52 PM |
#16 |
| -
WTF |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 01:08 PM |
#21 |
| -
"drug tests cost money" |
GreenArrow |
Sep-04-07 03:11 PM |
#58 |
| -
Edwards supports border control, |
Kelly Rupert |
Sep-04-07 11:40 AM |
#2 |
| -
thank you |
iverglas |
Sep-04-07 11:44 AM |
#4 |
| -
This was ridiculous the FIRST time you posted it, and it hasn't improved with repetition. |
dicksteele |
Sep-04-07 11:43 AM |
#3 |
| -
So Edwards does not support the War On Drugs? |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 11:59 AM |
#5 |
| -
Where are there "mandatory urine tests"? (P.S. Don't do drugs.) |
WinkyDink |
Sep-04-07 12:08 PM |
#6 |
| -
Jobs. |
kgfnally |
Sep-04-07 12:09 PM |
#7 |
| -
Jobs mandate tests - they mandate a lot of things as conditions of employment. |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 12:25 PM |
#10 |
| -
And of course the government had *nothing* to do with employers |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 12:28 PM |
#12 |
| -
There are employers who test, and employers who don't. But how often |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 12:33 PM |
#15 |
| -
If pot was legal |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 12:52 PM |
#17 |
| -
Speculative. |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 12:54 PM |
#18 |
| -
If pot was legal.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 01:09 PM |
#22 |
| -
From what I've been told |
buddyhollysghost |
Sep-04-07 01:42 PM |
#28 |
| -
But of course the legal status of "drugs" has *nothing* to do with drug testing? |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 01:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
The government does require employers to drug testing. |
MindPilot |
Sep-04-07 02:39 PM |
#47 |
| -
We do in my family business- state and federal mandate. |
LeftyMom |
Sep-04-07 03:19 PM |
#63 |
| -
You might be surprised... |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:25 PM |
#66 |
| -
And, back to the thread, I don't know what Edwards thinks of that. |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 03:40 PM |
#72 |
| -
It's been quoted on the thread several times now.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:51 PM |
#77 |
| -
If you haven't done anything wrong.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 12:19 PM |
#8 |
| -
What mandatory urine testing has Edwards championed? Here's what I found on his record |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 12:22 PM |
#9 |
| -
dang |
iverglas |
Sep-04-07 12:31 PM |
#14 |
| -
Funny |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 12:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
So you've got nothing saying he supports mandatory urine testing. |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 01:22 PM |
#26 |
| -
So you have nothing that says |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 01:32 PM |
#27 |
| -
You're the one who made a claim about Edwards, not me. NT |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:05 PM |
#31 |
| -
Show me where I claimed Edwards supports mandatory urine testing.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:07 PM |
#34 |
| -
Right here: |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:20 PM |
#40 |
| -
We *already* have mandatory urine tests... |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:22 PM |
#41 |
| -
What does that have to do with John Edwards? |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:24 PM |
#42 |
| -
If "drugs" were not illegal.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:30 PM |
#45 |
| -
In some cases because they might interfere with performance making the |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:36 PM |
#46 |
| -
Here are his positions on "drugs" |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:53 PM |
#53 |
| -
So if he says nothing about the "war on drugs" it means he's pro-gestapo? |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:57 PM |
#56 |
| -
Kucinich has gone on the record as being against the War On Drugs.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:11 PM |
#59 |
| -
I don't deny either of those things. But I have no idea what Edwards' stance |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 03:17 PM |
#62 |
| -
Edwards' positions on "drugs" are quite clear.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:24 PM |
#65 |
| -
What more do I want? An actual statement from Edwards that says what |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 03:25 PM |
#67 |
| -
You have already seen his positions on the War On Drugs. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:39 PM |
#71 |
| -
The"War on Drugs" could arguably include a wide range of things. I |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 03:42 PM |
#73 |
| -
You are grasping at straws... |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:50 PM |
#76 |
| -
I don't know that he is or isn't/ I know what his stance is on a couple of issues |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 03:54 PM |
#79 |
| -
Dude, I think your bong is out. n/t |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 12:25 PM |
#11 |
| -
You beat me to it. LOL! |
Skidmore |
Sep-04-07 12:30 PM |
#13 |
| -
Well, with such well reasoned logic |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 01:04 PM |
#20 |
| -
I suggest you respond by citing Edwards' support for mandatory urine tests. |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 01:18 PM |
#25 |
| -
Show me where I claimed Edwards supports mandatory urine testing.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:09 PM |
#36 |
| -
If a response requires well reasoned logic, I imagine you will not be able to respond at all. |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:07 PM |
#32 |
| -
Of the good stuff that is. |
Blue State Native |
Sep-04-07 01:10 PM |
#23 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Sep-04-07 01:17 PM |
#24 |
| -
See?? n/t |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:07 PM |
#33 |
| -
Paranoia is paranoia.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:15 PM |
#38 |
| -
Um |
BuffyTheFundieSlayer |
Sep-04-07 01:57 PM |
#30 |
| -
Yeah, but do they know what it means?? n/t |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:08 PM |
#35 |
| -
Not *everyone* is subject to mandatory urine testing now.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:12 PM |
#37 |
| -
Edwards never said ANYTHING ABOUT MANDATORY CHECK UPS |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:16 PM |
#39 |
| -
It really depends on one's interpretation of what Edwards said.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:27 PM |
#43 |
| -
A) Those are some pretty broad comments and B).... |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:44 PM |
#48 |
| -
Requires |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:49 PM |
#50 |
| -
Depends. If there are multiple plans, and some have requirements, |
mondo joe |
Sep-04-07 02:51 PM |
#51 |
| -
Oh. I don't care who you vote for. I just don't think that Edwards |
renie408 |
Sep-04-07 02:53 PM |
#52 |
| -
"continue with your own private carrier, no problem" |
GreenArrow |
Sep-04-07 03:23 PM |
#64 |
| -
Sure does..... |
BlackVelvet04 |
Sep-04-07 02:46 PM |
#49 |
| -
if you're required to have a urine test anyway, it'd only be polite to throw in a free checkup |
0rganism |
Sep-04-07 02:29 PM |
#44 |
| -
Actually it's kinda fun... |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 02:55 PM |
#54 |
| -
He supports something that employers are already doing |
LittleClarkie |
Sep-04-07 02:56 PM |
#55 |
| -
And the problem is .. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:14 PM |
#60 |
| -
Because employers have prospective employees pee in a cup? |
LittleClarkie |
Sep-04-07 03:17 PM |
#61 |
| -
Let's see,... |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:29 PM |
#68 |
| -
I thought most employers did it at the beginning of the hiring process |
LittleClarkie |
Sep-04-07 03:36 PM |
#70 |
| -
Do you or any of your coworkers drink alcohol? |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:43 PM |
#74 |
| -
If they drink ON THE JOB they too would get fired |
LittleClarkie |
Sep-04-07 03:50 PM |
#75 |
| -
But that is not the purpose of drug testing.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:53 PM |
#78 |
| -
Oh come on! You know that the US government is nothing but benevolent. |
MindPilot |
Sep-04-07 03:08 PM |
#57 |
| -
Yes, I agree.. |
The Vinyl Ripper |
Sep-04-07 03:31 PM |
#69 |
| -
locking |
maddezmom |
Sep-04-07 07:26 PM |
#80 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread