You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #20: Well, with such well reasoned logic [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-04-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Well, with such well reasoned logic
How can I possibly respond?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -It is only a small step from mandatory urine tests to mandatory checkups.. The Vinyl Ripper  Sep-04-07 11:00 AM   #0 
  - This is like the fifth time I've seen this bit of silliness...  iamahaingttta   Sep-04-07 11:37 AM   #1 
  - Indeed ...  Drifter   Sep-04-07 12:52 PM   #16 
     - WTF  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 01:08 PM   #21 
     - "drug tests cost money"  GreenArrow   Sep-04-07 03:11 PM   #58 
  - Edwards supports border control,  Kelly Rupert   Sep-04-07 11:40 AM   #2 
  - thank you  iverglas   Sep-04-07 11:44 AM   #4 
  - This was ridiculous the FIRST time you posted it, and it hasn't improved with repetition.  dicksteele   Sep-04-07 11:43 AM   #3 
  - So Edwards does not support the War On Drugs?  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 11:59 AM   #5 
  - Where are there "mandatory urine tests"? (P.S. Don't do drugs.)  WinkyDink   Sep-04-07 12:08 PM   #6 
  - Jobs.  kgfnally   Sep-04-07 12:09 PM   #7 
  - Jobs mandate tests - they mandate a lot of things as conditions of employment.  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 12:25 PM   #10 
     - And of course the government had *nothing* to do with employers  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 12:28 PM   #12 
        - There are employers who test, and employers who don't. But how often  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 12:33 PM   #15 
           - If pot was legal  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 12:52 PM   #17 
           - Speculative.  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 12:54 PM   #18 
              - If pot was legal..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 01:09 PM   #22 
                 - From what I've been told  buddyhollysghost   Sep-04-07 01:42 PM   #28 
                    - But of course the legal status of "drugs" has *nothing* to do with drug testing?  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 01:51 PM   #29 
                    - The government does require employers to drug testing.  MindPilot   Sep-04-07 02:39 PM   #47 
           - We do in my family business- state and federal mandate.  LeftyMom   Sep-04-07 03:19 PM   #63 
              - You might be surprised...  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:25 PM   #66 
              - And, back to the thread, I don't know what Edwards thinks of that.  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 03:40 PM   #72 
                 - It's been quoted on the thread several times now..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:51 PM   #77 
  - If you haven't done anything wrong..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 12:19 PM   #8 
  - What mandatory urine testing has Edwards championed? Here's what I found on his record  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 12:22 PM   #9 
  - dang  iverglas   Sep-04-07 12:31 PM   #14 
  - Funny  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 12:59 PM   #19 
     - So you've got nothing saying he supports mandatory urine testing.  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 01:22 PM   #26 
        - So you have nothing that says  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 01:32 PM   #27 
           - You're the one who made a claim about Edwards, not me. NT  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:05 PM   #31 
              - Show me where I claimed Edwards supports mandatory urine testing..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:07 PM   #34 
                 - Right here:  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:20 PM   #40 
                    - We *already* have mandatory urine tests...  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:22 PM   #41 
                       - What does that have to do with John Edwards?  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:24 PM   #42 
                          - If "drugs" were not illegal..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:30 PM   #45 
                             - In some cases because they might interfere with performance making the  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:36 PM   #46 
                                - Here are his positions on "drugs"  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:53 PM   #53 
                                   - So if he says nothing about the "war on drugs" it means he's pro-gestapo?  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:57 PM   #56 
                                      - Kucinich has gone on the record as being against the War On Drugs..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:11 PM   #59 
                                         - I don't deny either of those things. But I have no idea what Edwards' stance  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 03:17 PM   #62 
                                            - Edwards' positions on "drugs" are quite clear..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:24 PM   #65 
                                               - What more do I want? An actual statement from Edwards that says what  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 03:25 PM   #67 
                                                  - You have already seen his positions on the War On Drugs.  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:39 PM   #71 
                                                     - The"War on Drugs" could arguably include a wide range of things. I  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 03:42 PM   #73 
                                                     - You are grasping at straws...  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:50 PM   #76 
                                                     - I don't know that he is or isn't/ I know what his stance is on a couple of issues  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 03:54 PM   #79 
  - Dude, I think your bong is out. n/t  renie408   Sep-04-07 12:25 PM   #11 
  - You beat me to it. LOL!  Skidmore   Sep-04-07 12:30 PM   #13 
  - Well, with such well reasoned logic  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 01:04 PM   #20 
  - I suggest you respond by citing Edwards' support for mandatory urine tests.  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 01:18 PM   #25 
  - Show me where I claimed Edwards supports mandatory urine testing..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:09 PM   #36 
  - If a response requires well reasoned logic, I imagine you will not be able to respond at all.  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:07 PM   #32 
  - Of the good stuff that is.  Blue State Native   Sep-04-07 01:10 PM   #23 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-04-07 01:17 PM   #24 
        - See?? n/t  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:07 PM   #33 
           - Paranoia is paranoia..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:15 PM   #38 
  - Um  BuffyTheFundieSlayer   Sep-04-07 01:57 PM   #30 
  - Yeah, but do they know what it means?? n/t  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:08 PM   #35 
  - Not *everyone* is subject to mandatory urine testing now..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:12 PM   #37 
     - Edwards never said ANYTHING ABOUT MANDATORY CHECK UPS  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:16 PM   #39 
        - It really depends on one's interpretation of what Edwards said..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:27 PM   #43 
           - A) Those are some pretty broad comments and B)....  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:44 PM   #48 
           - Requires  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:49 PM   #50 
           - Depends. If there are multiple plans, and some have requirements,  mondo joe   Sep-04-07 02:51 PM   #51 
           - Oh. I don't care who you vote for. I just don't think that Edwards  renie408   Sep-04-07 02:53 PM   #52 
           - "continue with your own private carrier, no problem"  GreenArrow   Sep-04-07 03:23 PM   #64 
           - Sure does.....  BlackVelvet04   Sep-04-07 02:46 PM   #49 
  - if you're required to have a urine test anyway, it'd only be polite to throw in a free checkup  0rganism   Sep-04-07 02:29 PM   #44 
  - Actually it's kinda fun...  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 02:55 PM   #54 
  - He supports something that employers are already doing  LittleClarkie   Sep-04-07 02:56 PM   #55 
  - And the problem is ..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:14 PM   #60 
     - Because employers have prospective employees pee in a cup?  LittleClarkie   Sep-04-07 03:17 PM   #61 
        - Let's see,...  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:29 PM   #68 
           - I thought most employers did it at the beginning of the hiring process  LittleClarkie   Sep-04-07 03:36 PM   #70 
              - Do you or any of your coworkers drink alcohol?  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:43 PM   #74 
                 - If they drink ON THE JOB they too would get fired  LittleClarkie   Sep-04-07 03:50 PM   #75 
                    - But that is not the purpose of drug testing..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:53 PM   #78 
  - Oh come on! You know that the US government is nothing but benevolent.  MindPilot   Sep-04-07 03:08 PM   #57 
  - Yes, I agree..  The Vinyl Ripper   Sep-04-07 03:31 PM   #69 
  - locking  maddezmom   Sep-04-07 07:26 PM   #80 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC