You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: I'd say it's the gay angle. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'd say it's the gay angle.
Randi Rhodes was just talking about that with the Highly Useless richard "Monica" wolffe. The key, which she pointed out and I COMPLETELY agree, is the stench of RAMPANT homophobia - because of what seems suspiciously like a WHOLE LOTTA closeted gays who are imprisoned into silence and lives of lies by the oppressive policies of their frickin' party, and also, various and assorted sexual perverts and child predators like mark foley (not to mention diaper dudes like david vitter). Yet these are the same people who scream and holler on at the top of their sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, phony-baloney lungs about "family values" and "gays are bad" and "defense of 'marriage'" and all that bedroom-busybody crap. We HAVE TO start screaming JUST AS LOUD to EXPOSE this.

Might be "manna from heaven" so to speak (!) to start prying the fucking religious wrong and all the fucking mullas and ayatollas from the Bible Belt to Colorado Springs away from the political party structure. Or, compel them to break off and form their own "Party of God" separate from either the Dems OR the hijacked GOP. It would be a very good and shrewd move, I think, to further empower and enable those on the other side of the aisle who are growing increasingly uncomfortable about their party veering off onto the morality hard-on path. Some of them have already started talking about wanting to get back to the days when the Republican Party stood for secular things that benefited any congregation (or not) like less government spending and less government intrusion. Frankly, that's where they SHOULD be, instead of being fucking latter-day Puritans. Those who are starting to talk up this schism should be encouraged. Because religion DOES NOT belong in politics. This is NOT Tehran. This is NOT a theocracy and wasn't designed to be that way. And regardless what the "God's Warriors" crowd from Regent University and elsewhere want to insist, there IS a separation of church and state, and it ABSOLUTELY should NOT be undermined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why are these dumbass repukes not stripping Ted Stevens of his committee roles LynneSin  Aug-30-07 02:56 PM   #0 
  - Simple - it's "the gay"  NewJeffCT   Aug-30-07 02:58 PM   #1 
  - I think the word dumbass would be the key to your answer...n/t  Virginia Dare   Aug-30-07 02:58 PM   #2 
  - Actually, it's the word "guilty"  SteppingRazor   Aug-30-07 02:59 PM   #3 
  - Point taken  BOSSHOG   Aug-30-07 03:07 PM   #6 
  - To clarify Vitter hasn't been charged with his crime but did ADMIT Guilt  MagickMuffin   Aug-30-07 03:16 PM   #8 
     - Well, that's right, but when I said guilty, I meant guilty in a court of law. n/t  SteppingRazor   Aug-30-07 03:36 PM   #10 
  - Maybe they want to spare themselves one of his tantrums  eleny   Aug-30-07 03:00 PM   #4 
  - Homophobia.  ThomCat   Aug-30-07 03:02 PM   #5 
  - Stevens didn't have to blow anyone to get his bridge, I guess.  IanDB1   Aug-30-07 03:13 PM   #7 
  - Yes, why not...  coco77   Aug-30-07 03:27 PM   #9 
  - And don't forget his "vote"....The party first doncha know..  monmouth   Aug-30-07 03:36 PM   #11 
  - I'd say it's the gay angle.  calimary   Aug-30-07 04:00 PM   #12 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC