You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: Um, we? You mean some? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-30-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. Um, we? You mean some?
I wasn't pissed at her at all. Have never been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Remember when we were all pissed at Cindy et al for protesting at Conyers' Office? Warren Stupidity  Aug-30-07 06:10 AM   #0 
  - I wasn't pissed at her  bananas   Aug-30-07 06:13 AM   #1 
  - Conyers addressed this at the townhall this week.  lwfern   Aug-30-07 06:19 AM   #2 
  - Conyers says a lot of things.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 06:23 AM   #3 
  - He has a long and distinguished and very liberal  cali   Aug-30-07 06:26 AM   #4 
  - It isn't just Conyers.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 06:31 AM   #6 
  - Gross generalizations  cali   Aug-30-07 06:44 AM   #7 
  - Why are you even involved in politics?  yibbehobba   Aug-30-07 06:48 AM   #10 
  - self-delete  cali   Aug-30-07 06:54 AM   #11 
  - LOL  crikkett   Aug-30-07 06:58 AM   #13 
  - Heh.  mzmolly   Aug-30-07 01:25 PM   #36 
  - !  seasonedblue   Aug-30-07 01:28 PM   #37 
  - Did I personally insult you?  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 07:52 PM   #49 
     - It's all they have to say  Truth2Tell   Aug-31-07 10:47 AM   #78 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Aug-30-07 07:59 PM   #53 
     - Wow, such a low blow.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 08:15 PM   #56 
        - So. the numbers of Dem vs Repub in the Senate and House mean nothing?  nini   Aug-30-07 08:22 PM   #59 
           - "sucks but it's true."  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 08:28 PM   #60 
              - Nailed it  jgraz   Aug-31-07 02:42 AM   #69 
  - Great times demand great actions.  Tesha   Aug-30-07 06:47 AM   #9 
     - Let me name some for you:  cali   Aug-30-07 06:56 AM   #12 
     - Ahh -- that must explain why the war is over and we all have health care.  Tesha   Aug-30-07 07:05 AM   #15 
     - That's fucking logical???  cali   Aug-30-07 07:18 AM   #16 
        - Indeed.  yibbehobba   Aug-30-07 07:20 AM   #18 
        - Oddly enough, after the Republicans *FAILED* at impeachment, they *WON* everything else.  Tesha   Aug-30-07 07:38 AM   #21 
        - I don't consider the scenario to be like the Clinton impeachment at all.  yibbehobba   Aug-30-07 07:49 AM   #26 
        - If you think we're united, you're in for a surprise in 2008.  Tesha   Aug-30-07 07:56 AM   #27 
        - You think that impeaching a widely disapproved of president is riskier...  JVS   Aug-30-07 01:36 PM   #39 
        - Two coup attempts; they failed at the first  shimmergal   Aug-30-07 01:39 PM   #40 
        - Stop this!  DancingBear   Aug-31-07 07:15 AM   #74 
        - Pointing out the obvious? Heh....  PBass   Aug-30-07 07:01 PM   #47 
        - I'm just wondering what all those "powerful" Democrats are doing.  Tesha   Aug-30-07 07:40 AM   #22 
           - The Dem Majority in the senate isONE vote, and that includes LIEberman -- they will have to get more  emulatorloo   Aug-30-07 02:33 PM   #42 
           - Really? They do not have a super majority and without one they can't do much but set the agenda.  saracat   Aug-30-07 06:29 PM   #46 
              - Oddly enough they can't even do that.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 07:56 PM   #52 
              - Really? Can't Pelosi keep a funding bill off the House floor forever?  jgraz   Aug-31-07 02:39 AM   #68 
              - At what point during the Clinton Presidency did the Republicans have a Veto-proof majority?  Tesha   Aug-31-07 06:16 AM   #71 
     - Why do we always leave Kucinich out of the equation?  nathan hale   Aug-31-07 10:55 AM   #79 
     - Why are you at DU if you really believe that?  nini   Aug-30-07 08:01 PM   #54 
        - Vote for him and see.  Tesha   Aug-31-07 06:19 AM   #72 
  - more than anyone of us has ever done....  robinlynne   Aug-30-07 03:31 PM   #45 
  - I felt the same outrage that Cindy felt when they gave new funds for the war --  defendandprotect   Aug-30-07 11:52 AM   #33 
  - He was a class act, in spite of her behavior  JNelson6563   Aug-30-07 09:07 PM   #67 
     - Nothing he said was "in spite of" her behavior.  lwfern   Aug-31-07 10:46 PM   #80 
  - No...  yibbehobba   Aug-30-07 06:29 AM   #5 
  - Last week of July I think  crikkett   Aug-30-07 07:01 AM   #14 
  - Oh I see...  sendero   Aug-30-07 07:19 AM   #17 
  - I'd rather not...  yibbehobba   Aug-30-07 07:41 AM   #23 
     - Awww...  sendero   Aug-30-07 07:44 AM   #24 
  - The source of the outrage was primarily..  Virginia Dare   Aug-30-07 03:12 PM   #44 
  - "we were all pissed"? Not me, my friend.  MethuenProgressive   Aug-30-07 06:44 AM   #8 
  - Cindy is the main hero out of the last 6 years. Wouldn't bash her for a second.  cooolandrew   Aug-30-07 07:27 AM   #19 
  - Fannie Lou Hammer of the new century.  Tom Joad   Aug-30-07 11:03 AM   #30 
     - Gawd how I loved her -- !!! The totally powerless speaking to the powerful --  defendandprotect   Aug-30-07 11:54 AM   #34 
  - the (false) premise behind her protest is that Conyers is capable of more than he's already doing  bigtree   Aug-30-07 07:31 AM   #20 
  - I was not ticked of and had hoped she would make a difference. and probably  rodeodance   Aug-30-07 07:45 AM   #25 
  - I wasn't pissed off at her at all. I thought it was a great idea.  Mutineer   Aug-30-07 07:59 AM   #28 
  - Quiet. Dems are supporting Bush while he prepares to attack Iran.  Tom Joad   Aug-30-07 11:02 AM   #29 
  - Truth. nt.  IndianaJones   Aug-30-07 11:04 AM   #31 
  - What's this "we" crap? nt  Javaman   Aug-30-07 11:40 AM   #32 
  - Um, we? You mean some?  Hissyspit   Aug-30-07 12:43 PM   #35 
  - Of course she did. And it wasn't only Cindy, remember?  sfexpat2000   Aug-30-07 01:28 PM   #38 
  - Damn straight she had a point! I was never pissed at her. n/t  NotGivingUp   Aug-30-07 01:46 PM   #41 
  - God Bless Her  mdmc   Aug-30-07 02:33 PM   #43 
  - Yes of course 'we' is hyperbole.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 07:51 PM   #48 
  - Umm...Not "All Of Us" Were Pissed.  stirlingsliver   Aug-30-07 07:55 PM   #50 
  - We weren't all pissed at her. Some were. - n/t  porphyrian   Aug-30-07 07:55 PM   #51 
  - who's we?  sniffa   Aug-30-07 08:02 PM   #55 
  - she had no more of a point than you do  paulk   Aug-30-07 08:21 PM   #57 
  - I was only pissed at her for saying I belonged to the party of slavery...  BlooInBloo   Aug-30-07 08:22 PM   #58 
  - yes that was stupid.  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 08:29 PM   #61 
     - It's thoroughly deceitful race-baiting.  BlooInBloo   Aug-30-07 08:31 PM   #63 
        - The Democratic Party  Warren Stupidity   Aug-30-07 08:37 PM   #64 
           - And you're carrying on the deciet. It was a different party of the same name....  BlooInBloo   Aug-30-07 08:45 PM   #66 
              - No it was not a different party  Warren Stupidity   Aug-31-07 07:14 AM   #73 
              - Bullshit.  cali   Aug-31-07 07:19 AM   #75 
                 - How about the Democratic Party of 1963? 1947?  Warren Stupidity   Aug-31-07 09:00 AM   #76 
  - Oh no... not another Cindy thread  ConfidentialStatus   Aug-30-07 08:31 PM   #62 
  - We? You mean if I look back at those threads I'll find a pissed off you?  LittleClarkie   Aug-30-07 08:40 PM   #65 
  - I agreed with her then and now. Conyers gave us a lot of brave  Vidar   Aug-31-07 04:19 AM   #70 
  - Actually I remember you and others defending her  bryant69   Aug-31-07 09:05 AM   #77 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC