You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: Regarding your questions. non-email, DM's id, the NSA spying, and ROVE [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #82
83. Regarding your questions. non-email, DM's id, the NSA spying, and ROVE
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 12:25 AM by L. Coyote
Your Q: What are the "non-email methods" . . . ????... for "non discussions" --- ????

Shared workspace. Imagine a web site with only a select class of persons having access, like a military web, or a law firm's web. Basically, a private network. So, in such a space I might check out a document and edit it, save the edit, then e-alert collaborators. Someone else reviews my work, does their edit, then the boss looks it over and does an edit....

Your Q: btw, does someone know the identity?

There is a link in the OP to his blog. One idea I consider for his posting at TPM is that his blog was not being read or cited anywhere. That is suspicious, and perhaps the blog was being black listed, somehow blocked. I have been researching these topics, and never turned up his writing. I find no links to it in DU either. Curious, given the topics. So, maybe he just decided to take his thoughts to well-read sites.

Regarding your quotes of DM: "How the online collaboration relates to e-mails, links, URLs, decisions, timing of meetings, or subsequent actions/patterns/decisions remains to be understood."

This portion is important. It points to how he is speaking to Congress and investigators. I have yet to see that this is so however. There is some question of the possible red herring aspect of the posts. One of my first reactions to the posts was "free-association disorder."

Also, he seems to promulgate the idea that the domestic surveillance is being stripped of individual identification, hence made legal to read. If anything in all this is a red herring, perhaps it is this view in support of the Bush spying. My informant on this says it is piped overseas, where US law does not apply. If true, that is the huge secret! Any statements that the captured communications are being altered to make them legal to read seems the smoke screen, if what my informant said is true. This is the sort of program that would fit the scenario with Mueller, Comey, et.al. resigning, and that would place the telecommunication companies in the US in legal jeopardy because their actions in the conspiracy to evade the law takes place inside the US. It fits the known facts about the installations at the telecoms.

Regarding Rove, instead of repeating my opinions here, read this thread:

Has Rove's Egg Hatched? The Firing of KARL ROVE or Why His Family Needs Him Now.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC