You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #82: Could it be that Karl Rove left the White House to handle this from OUTSIDE . . . ?????? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-26-07 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
82. Could it be that Karl Rove left the White House to handle this from OUTSIDE . . . ??????
Edited on Sun Aug-26-07 12:33 AM by defendandprotect
If I were investigating what has gone on, I'd be following ole Karl Rove around for the next months.

The name of their game is stealing by cheating and they are much more ambitious, IMO, than any of us have ever dreamed.

INTENSE SECRECY is necessary to all of this.

And they want retroactive approval for what they've done because they can't keep the lid on without it.


I didn't get very far along in looking at what the mystery poster has posted -- btw, does someone know the identity? -- however, this is the point I'm making . . . they had to communicate and rapidly with each other -- how many? I think this makes it clear:


QUOTE --
18. excerpt only --
The speed with which the Military Commissions Act updates were coordinated after copying and pasting the UCMJ clauses suggests that there was an on-line collaborative tool which contractors, legal counsel, and other personnel were able to quickly update, make changes, leave comments, and produce a final MCA. Whether the final language was Constitution remains a legal mater outside this discussion.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DISCOVERY

18. It is not appropriate to focus only on E-mails. To date, it does not appear Congress has the independent means to specifically target, detect, and sample on-line collaborative tools and data sharing platforms unless Congress receives a copy of the e-mail authorization for that particular platform. We recommend Congress request for all e-mail approvals for any online platform; and that all codes related to the access of these platforms be independently reviewed by a special master and sealed.

19. We are concerned that the Congress appears to be narrowly focusing on e-mails, without necessarily considering the non-email methods for WH, EOP, and outside counsel to have "non discussions". How the online collaboration relates to e-mails, links, URLs, decisions, timing of meetings, or subsequent actions/patterns/decisions remains to be understood. Ralston's changed comment does not in any way exclude the possibility this has occurred and qualifies as a "non discussion." UNQUOTE

What are the "non-email methods" . . . ??????? ??????????????????????????????????????????
for "non discussions" --- ???? ???????????????????????????????

Obviously, some part of the Pentagon is after Bush -- but another part may be aiding him --
if that's so, Cheney will be deeply involved and perhaps doing his own thinking???
Planning ????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC