You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #150: If. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
150. If.
Are we sure he is really going to be gone? As an advisor he could have dumped a massive strategy on the whitehouse to carry it through the next year or so. If anything this feels a little ominous to me. I am certain he wouldn't leave without giving them a playbook for the next year and/or be available via computer or phone. So his actual office not being in the white house would be meaningless.

Now if he REALLY is leaving that IS odd.
I can think of three scenarios that follow this.

1. Congress has them! The regular investigations have finally yielded the density of criminality needed to convince even the most corporatists of the DLC dems to examine impeachment. Even Arlen Spector is in a full foaming fury. The Bushies are trying to limit Rove and protect him and themselves at the same time. (and this one is my favorite)

2. Rove is setting up to help out one of the current candidates with their bid for presidency, and/or deep involvement with several congressional races. (This is the most likely one)

3. The administration REALLY doesn't need him anymore. For one reason or another Rove is not relevant. Perhaps the Neo-Cons think that Tony Snow is adequate as a propegandist but that they have strategy worked out. This is a scary possibility. It means they expect something to happen and it will be dramatic enought that it writes itself. Bush asserts absolute unitary emergency powers-stuff like that. (rather unlikely)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC