Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
|
Thu Aug-09-07 09:20 PM
Original message |
| The Economist Magazine: Republicans In Big, Big Trouble |
 |
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/9/171725/8087 The Economist: Republicans in Big, Big Trouble by thereisnospoon Thu Aug 09, 2007 at 04:28:12 PM PDT
After a long six and a half years of watching almost helplessly as the Republican Party loots, rapes and pillages everything from the Constitution to the middle class to non-threatening countries overseas, it's always satisfying to see rats call a spade a spade and jump off the pirate ship known as the modern GOP. But rarely has the sense of schadenfreude been more poignant to me than when reading the latest Economist article today about the woes of the Republican Party and American conservative movement in general.
The article, titled The American Right Under the Weather, is but one piece in the new overall issue covering the leftward shift of American politics in recent months. As anyone who has read the magazine knows, the editorial staff of The Economist is certainly no friend to Democrats, favoring a decidedly corporatist agenda valuing "free trade over "fair trade" and a foreign policy usually at odds with progressive values. As a result, however, they find themselves increasingly at odds with the social conservatives who have all but taken over the Republican party's activist base: in fact, they say so directly in the cover article:
- snip -
The sheer numbers are staggering. Some key statistical points from the article include:
- 40% of Republicans think that Democrats will win the next presidential election, compared with only 12% of Democrats who think the reverse
- Q2 money to the Democratic presidential contenders nearly doubled that given to the Republican contenders
- As has been frequently mentioned by Markos, the DSCC and D-Trip are vastly outraising the NRSC and NRCC
- 61% of Democrats are happy with our choices of candidates, while only 36% of Republicans can say the same
- Young voters and Hispanic voters are trending overwhelmingly Democratic
Registered Democrats and Democratic-leaners are now 50% of the population, while registered Republicans and Republican-leaners only comprise 35%--a strong swing from an equal 43%-43% tie in 2002. And the list goes on and on....
- snip -
Most intriguing, however, is the article's nearly ferocious rejection of the idea that GOP woes are entirely the fault of Bush, the occupation of Iraq, or the corruption of specific Republican party officials. Instead, the Economist is unafraid to lay the blame squarely where it belongs: the embrace of a hyper-conservative agenda of social moralizing, beyond-the-pale cronyism, an unhealthy dose of nativism and racism, corruption so blatant it has become institutionalized, a borrow-and-spend budgetary philosophy, and redistribution of wealth to the very rich that has appalled all but the Christianist right and some very wealthy allies...
MORE
|
The Economist Magazine: Republicans In Big, Big Trouble |
Hissyspit |
Aug-09-07 09:20 PM |
#0 |

Bookmarking this baby-thanks! nt |
babylonsister |
Aug-09-07 09:37 PM |
#1 |

i actually get The Economist--i like to think it cancels out my "Glamour" subscription. |
chimpsrsmarter |
Aug-09-07 09:40 PM |
#2 |
 
Nice. Very Nice. |
TalkingDog |
Aug-09-07 11:03 PM |
#8 |

I read the Economist for 20 years |
burythehatchet |
Aug-09-07 09:40 PM |
#3 |
 
Very conservative in the UK, however |
NewJeffCT |
Aug-10-07 01:51 PM |
#35 |

Get over it, America is not conservative... |
dickbearton |
Aug-10-07 08:18 PM |
#47 |

"hyper-conservative" agenda? WTF ??? |
SpiralHawk |
Aug-09-07 09:43 PM |
#4 |
 
They are the BIGspenders. |
higher class |
Aug-09-07 11:20 PM |
#9 |
 
I think the article was using "hyper-conservative" |
tex-wyo-dem |
Aug-10-07 02:47 AM |
#13 |
  
The so-called Christian Right - is a cabal of diaper-wearing closet cases |
SpiralHawk |
Aug-10-07 08:33 AM |
#15 |
 
Very true. They are Extreme Right Wing...NOT conservative |
Jacobin |
Aug-10-07 10:34 AM |
#22 |
  
Jacobin you are right, they are not conservative... |
dickbearton |
Aug-10-07 07:50 PM |
#46 |
 
I just like |
libodem |
Aug-12-07 05:52 PM |
#53 |

Wow! |
JNelson6563 |
Aug-09-07 09:58 PM |
#5 |

k & r |
salin |
Aug-09-07 10:11 PM |
#6 |

The essence is always "Who drives down to vote." These #'s say: |
jazzjunkysue |
Aug-09-07 10:22 PM |
#7 |

. |
Hissyspit |
Aug-10-07 12:58 AM |
#10 |

2008 is ours to lose! Unfortunately, we Democrats might be up to that challenge. |
struggle4progress |
Aug-10-07 01:19 AM |
#11 |
 
So was 2004 and 2000 |
BearSquirrel2 |
Aug-10-07 09:06 PM |
#50 |
 
Gotta admit, sadly, you made me chuckle there. |
sofedupwithbush |
Aug-11-07 11:42 PM |
#52 |

just got to love the headline |
proud patriot |
Aug-10-07 01:22 AM |
#12 |

Murdoch is trying to buy the FT. |
Joanne98 |
Aug-10-07 05:49 AM |
#14 |
 
I don't think so - there was an article saying he's trying to take their market share |
muriel_volestrangler |
Aug-10-07 10:41 AM |
#24 |

Oooh, that might be a good one to send to the RW relatives!! |
progressoid |
Aug-10-07 08:45 AM |
#16 |

The Climate For Republicans Wasn't Much Better In 1976 |
DemocratSinceBirth |
Aug-10-07 08:48 AM |
#17 |
 
and that was when we had a pretty decent media |
karynnj |
Aug-10-07 09:34 AM |
#18 |

And free and fair elections |
nxylas |
Aug-10-07 12:03 PM |
#27 |

Here are some interesting graphs from the article.......... |
RedEarth |
Aug-10-07 09:51 AM |
#19 |

Better Late Than Never, I Suppose. Truth in Journalism, What a Concept! |
Demeter |
Aug-10-07 10:02 AM |
#20 |

Look how demoralized Dems are.... |
marions ghost |
Aug-10-07 10:30 AM |
#21 |
 
I read that differently. |
myrna minx |
Aug-10-07 10:34 AM |
#23 |

It's confusing if you read quickly... but I do see what you mean |
marions ghost |
Aug-10-07 10:53 AM |
#25 |

It's been amusing over the years . . . |
Patriot Abroad |
Aug-10-07 11:44 AM |
#26 |

Great insights... |
zehnkatzen |
Aug-10-07 12:08 PM |
#28 |
 
The ones I know remain willfully ignorant because they believe repukes will protect them |
glitch |
Aug-10-07 12:27 PM |
#29 |

Interesting article, but I don't buy some of it. |
Clark2008 |
Aug-10-07 12:32 PM |
#30 |
 
Democrats have not been really happy with their choice since I was began voting. |
JDPriestly |
Aug-10-07 03:06 PM |
#42 |

Wingerism failed |
creeksneakers2 |
Aug-10-07 12:48 PM |
#31 |
 
They don't mention "supply side" "economics" |
Alcibiades |
Aug-10-07 02:49 PM |
#41 |

oops... double post |
redqueen |
Aug-10-07 12:51 PM |
# |

That is encouraging... |
redqueen |
Aug-10-07 12:51 PM |
#32 |

Good article. |
sinkingfeeling |
Aug-10-07 12:53 PM |
#33 |

I find this concerning: |
BonnieJW |
Aug-10-07 01:39 PM |
#34 |

Music to my ears. nt |
thereismore |
Aug-10-07 02:21 PM |
#36 |

Take no comfort |
ramapo |
Aug-10-07 02:25 PM |
#37 |
 
The difference is |
ProudDad |
Aug-10-07 02:44 PM |
#40 |

As long as they own the executive branch and have over 40 Senators: |
DFW |
Aug-10-07 02:30 PM |
#38 |
 
You are talking about the reality of Hillary. |
JDPriestly |
Aug-10-07 03:08 PM |
#44 |

Hillary has been bought and paid |
ramapo |
Aug-10-07 03:23 PM |
#45 |

How right you are. That is why I am for Edwards. |
JDPriestly |
Aug-10-07 11:05 PM |
#51 |

Warning at the end |
ProudDad |
Aug-10-07 02:43 PM |
#39 |

Hunting Illegal Immigrants Fun New Game For College Republicans |
dragon82a |
Aug-10-07 03:08 PM |
#43 |

I'd like to point out that the Economist supported Kerry over Bush in 2004 |
nick303 |
Aug-10-07 08:25 PM |
#48 |

"borrow and spend" is an unfair description ... |
BearSquirrel2 |
Aug-10-07 09:03 PM |
#49 |

This has been one interesting read |
libodem |
Aug-12-07 06:32 PM |
#54 |