Donate to DU!
Democratic Underground Latest Threads
Latest
Greatest Threads
Greatest
Lobby
Lobby
Journals
Journals
Search
Search
Options
Options
Help
Help
Login
Login
Google

The Economist Magazine: Republicans In Big, Big Trouble [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
First thread | Last thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts)  Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Donate to DU! Thu Aug-09-07 09:20 PM
Original message
The Economist Magazine: Republicans In Big, Big Trouble
Advertisements [?]
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/8/9/171725/8087

The Economist: Republicans in Big, Big Trouble
by thereisnospoon
Thu Aug 09, 2007 at 04:28:12 PM PDT

After a long six and a half years of watching almost helplessly as the Republican Party loots, rapes and pillages everything from the Constitution to the middle class to non-threatening countries overseas, it's always satisfying to see rats call a spade a spade and jump off the pirate ship known as the modern GOP. But rarely has the sense of schadenfreude been more poignant to me than when reading the latest Economist article today about the woes of the Republican Party and American conservative movement in general.

The article, titled The American Right Under the Weather, is but one piece in the new overall issue covering the leftward shift of American politics in recent months. As anyone who has read the magazine knows, the editorial staff of The Economist is certainly no friend to Democrats, favoring a decidedly corporatist agenda valuing "free trade over "fair trade" and a foreign policy usually at odds with progressive values. As a result, however, they find themselves increasingly at odds with the social conservatives who have all but taken over the Republican party's activist base: in fact, they say so directly in the cover article:

- snip -

The sheer numbers are staggering. Some key statistical points from the article include:

  • 40% of Republicans think that Democrats will win the next presidential election, compared with only 12% of Democrats who think the reverse
  • Q2 money to the Democratic presidential contenders nearly doubled that given to the Republican contenders
  • As has been frequently mentioned by Markos, the DSCC and D-Trip are vastly outraising the NRSC and NRCC
  • 61% of Democrats are happy with our choices of candidates, while only 36% of Republicans can say the same
  • Young voters and Hispanic voters are trending overwhelmingly Democratic
    Registered Democrats and Democratic-leaners are now 50% of the population, while registered Republicans and Republican-leaners only comprise 35%--a strong swing from an equal 43%-43% tie in 2002.
And the list goes on and on....

- snip -

Most intriguing, however, is the article's nearly ferocious rejection of the idea that GOP woes are entirely the fault of Bush, the occupation of Iraq, or the corruption of specific Republican party officials. Instead, the Economist is unafraid to lay the blame squarely where it belongs: the embrace of a hyper-conservative agenda of social moralizing, beyond-the-pale cronyism, an unhealthy dose of nativism and racism, corruption so blatant it has become institutionalized, a borrow-and-spend budgetary philosophy, and redistribution of wealth to the very rich that has appalled all but the Christianist right and some very wealthy allies...

MORE


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  The Economist Magazine: Republicans In Big, Big Trouble Hissyspit  Aug-09-07 09:20 PM   #0 
   Bookmarking this baby-thanks! nt  babylonsister   Aug-09-07 09:37 PM   #1 
   i actually get The Economist--i like to think it cancels out my "Glamour" subscription.  chimpsrsmarter   Aug-09-07 09:40 PM   #2 
   Nice. Very Nice.  TalkingDog   Aug-09-07 11:03 PM   #8 
   I read the Economist for 20 years  burythehatchet   Aug-09-07 09:40 PM   #3 
   Very conservative in the UK, however  NewJeffCT   Aug-10-07 01:51 PM   #35 
      Get over it, America is not conservative...  dickbearton   Aug-10-07 08:18 PM   #47 
   "hyper-conservative" agenda? WTF ???  SpiralHawk   Aug-09-07 09:43 PM   #4 
   They are the BIGspenders.  higher class   Aug-09-07 11:20 PM   #9 
   I think the article was using "hyper-conservative"  tex-wyo-dem   Aug-10-07 02:47 AM   #13 
   The so-called Christian Right - is a cabal of diaper-wearing closet cases  SpiralHawk   Aug-10-07 08:33 AM   #15 
   Very true. They are Extreme Right Wing...NOT conservative  Jacobin   Aug-10-07 10:34 AM   #22 
   Jacobin you are right, they are not conservative...  dickbearton   Aug-10-07 07:50 PM   #46 
   I just like  libodem   Aug-12-07 05:52 PM   #53 
   Wow!  JNelson6563   Aug-09-07 09:58 PM   #5 
   k & r  salin   Aug-09-07 10:11 PM   #6 
   The essence is always "Who drives down to vote." These #'s say:  jazzjunkysue   Aug-09-07 10:22 PM   #7 
   .  Hissyspit   Aug-10-07 12:58 AM   #10 
   2008 is ours to lose! Unfortunately, we Democrats might be up to that challenge.  struggle4progress   Aug-10-07 01:19 AM   #11 
   So was 2004 and 2000  BearSquirrel2   Aug-10-07 09:06 PM   #50 
   Gotta admit, sadly, you made me chuckle there.  sofedupwithbush   Aug-11-07 11:42 PM   #52 
   just got to love the headline  proud patriotLead Moderator   Aug-10-07 01:22 AM   #12 
   Murdoch is trying to buy the FT.  Joanne98   Aug-10-07 05:49 AM   #14 
   I don't think so - there was an article saying he's trying to take their market share  muriel_volestrangler   Aug-10-07 10:41 AM   #24 
   Oooh, that might be a good one to send to the RW relatives!!  progressoid   Aug-10-07 08:45 AM   #16 
   The Climate For Republicans Wasn't Much Better In 1976  DemocratSinceBirth   Aug-10-07 08:48 AM   #17 
   and that was when we had a pretty decent media  karynnj   Aug-10-07 09:34 AM   #18 
      And free and fair elections  nxylas   Aug-10-07 12:03 PM   #27 
   Here are some interesting graphs from the article..........  RedEarth   Aug-10-07 09:51 AM   #19 
   Better Late Than Never, I Suppose. Truth in Journalism, What a Concept!  Demeter   Aug-10-07 10:02 AM   #20 
   Look how demoralized Dems are....  marions ghost   Aug-10-07 10:30 AM   #21 
   I read that differently.  myrna minx   Aug-10-07 10:34 AM   #23 
      It's confusing if you read quickly... but I do see what you mean  marions ghost   Aug-10-07 10:53 AM   #25 
   It's been amusing over the years . . .  Patriot Abroad   Aug-10-07 11:44 AM   #26 
   Great insights...  zehnkatzen   Aug-10-07 12:08 PM   #28 
   The ones I know remain willfully ignorant because they believe repukes will protect them  glitch   Aug-10-07 12:27 PM   #29 
   Interesting article, but I don't buy some of it.  Clark2008   Aug-10-07 12:32 PM   #30 
   Democrats have not been really happy with their choice since I was began voting.  JDPriestly   Aug-10-07 03:06 PM   #42 
   Wingerism failed  creeksneakers2   Aug-10-07 12:48 PM   #31 
   They don't mention "supply side" "economics"  Alcibiades   Aug-10-07 02:49 PM   #41 
   oops... double post  redqueen   Aug-10-07 12:51 PM   # 
   That is encouraging...  redqueen   Aug-10-07 12:51 PM   #32 
   Good article.  sinkingfeeling   Aug-10-07 12:53 PM   #33 
   I find this concerning:  BonnieJW   Aug-10-07 01:39 PM   #34 
   Music to my ears. nt  thereismore   Aug-10-07 02:21 PM   #36 
   Take no comfort  ramapo   Aug-10-07 02:25 PM   #37 
   The difference is  ProudDad   Aug-10-07 02:44 PM   #40 
   As long as they own the executive branch and have over 40 Senators:  DFW   Aug-10-07 02:30 PM   #38 
   You are talking about the reality of Hillary.  JDPriestly   Aug-10-07 03:08 PM   #44 
      Hillary has been bought and paid  ramapo   Aug-10-07 03:23 PM   #45 
         How right you are. That is why I am for Edwards.  JDPriestly   Aug-10-07 11:05 PM   #51 
   Warning at the end  ProudDad   Aug-10-07 02:43 PM   #39 
   Hunting Illegal Immigrants Fun New Game For College Republicans  dragon82a   Aug-10-07 03:08 PM   #43 
   I'd like to point out that the Economist supported Kerry over Bush in 2004  nick303   Aug-10-07 08:25 PM   #48 
   "borrow and spend" is an unfair description ...  BearSquirrel2   Aug-10-07 09:03 PM   #49 
   This has been one interesting read  libodem   Aug-12-07 06:32 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals  |  Links  |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2009 Democratic Underground, LLC