You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #93: Thanks MF [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. Thanks MF
Bookmark that article, I expect it may come in handy? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -DN!: Should Impeachment Be Off The Table? Debate With Cindy Sheehan, Ex-CIA Analyst Ray McGovern... babylonsister  Jul-27-07 09:25 AM   #0 
  - Thanks for that.  mmonk   Jul-27-07 09:27 AM   #1 
  - I listened  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 09:30 AM   #2 
  - K&R  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jul-27-07 09:31 AM   #3 
  - On Now. nt  babylonsister   Jul-27-07 10:11 AM   #4 
  - 45% approval, 80 town or city measures, 15 sponsors for  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:14 AM   #5 
  - A lot of the evidence for impeachment was presented to  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:31 AM   #6 
  - I caught that; but I had my doubts about that  babylonsister   Jul-27-07 10:36 AM   #9 
     - He's actually much better than I thought he would be!  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:39 AM   #10 
  - Why do Swanson and Sheehan continue to allow a dishonest characterization of what Conyers said to be  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 10:33 AM   #7 
  - Why not call his office? They should be able to answer that question.  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:34 AM   #8 
  - Talking with them now.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 10:44 AM   #12 
     - Transcript of Conyers on Amy's show 2/2007:  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:48 AM   #14 
        - Which to me says "I want to build a strong case."  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 10:54 AM   #16 
  - calling John Conyer's office for an exact quote might help  leftchick   Jul-27-07 10:40 AM   #11 
  - Just did "Conyers has not said he will NEVER impeach ... the off the table comment was made by  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 10:47 AM   #13 
     - See my post above. The problem isn't, to my mind, that  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 10:50 AM   #15 
        - I dont know that he wants to give these people more attention?  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 10:55 AM   #17 
           - What about those other people, the million people who signed  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 11:30 AM   #18 
           - Yep.  mmonk   Jul-27-07 11:38 AM   #19 
           - Call and ask for an official statement if you like?  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 11:49 AM   #20 
              - The idea would not be to continue the conflict but to clear up  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:24 PM   #28 
                 - I don't think that's possible  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 12:39 PM   #42 
           - "these people"??  leftchick   Jul-27-07 12:00 PM   #21 
              - I signed the petition as well.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 12:08 PM   #22 
              - So you are saying the party is in peril? Gotcha.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:23 PM   #27 
                 - Dr. Dean won't impeach either?!  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:24 PM   #30 
                    - What your group is doing is not funny.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:27 PM   #32 
                       - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-27-07 12:29 PM   #35 
                          - I have very little support here at all.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:33 PM   #38 
  - He told them to focus on the November 08 elections  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 12:17 PM   #23 
     - He told "THEM" to focus on the elections, he did not say that he would not do his job  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 12:44 PM   #46 
        - From those who met with him on Monday:  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 01:23 PM   #64 
           - Still no quotes, just paraphrased schmear.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 01:34 PM   #67 
              - And even more from that same article:  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 01:37 PM   #70 
              - ... which is why I defer to John Nichols and not more paraphrasing and innuendo.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 01:41 PM   #73 
                 - John Nichols was in the office with Conyers?  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 03:24 PM   #85 
                    - Nichols is a constitutional expert who clarified that neither Conyers or Pelosi can bring about  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 03:31 PM   #86 
                       - I have already posted that  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 03:39 PM   #87 
                          - You posted what each of them said, sans what Conyers said.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 03:42 PM   #88 
                             - But that would be hearsay  proud2Blib   Jul-27-07 04:01 PM   #90 
                                - A quote is a quote. A paraphrase is shit.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 05:54 PM   #91 
              - Nice.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 03:50 PM   #89 
                 - Thanks MF  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 05:58 PM   #93 
  - Cindy's supporters are determined to hurt a good man, aren't they?  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:20 PM   #24 
  - What spin? When I posted that, I was trying to answer a question.  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:22 PM   #25 
  - One post after the other. How am I out of line? Explain, please.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:24 PM   #29 
     - You are characterizing me as someone who wants to hurt Mr. Conyers  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:27 PM   #33 
        - Oh, well, then. Have your conversation.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:38 PM   #40 
           - Stay if you like but it's pretty hard to hold a conversation  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:40 PM   #43 
              - Oh, gee, I am so glad there have been no accusations flying...  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:55 PM   #51 
                 - Are they posting to this thread? I must have them on ignore  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:56 PM   #53 
  - what some do not get is it...the votes  bluedog   Jul-27-07 12:27 PM   #31 
     - They are trying to hurt Democrats.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 12:29 PM   #34 
     - many of us are so tired of this ...........  bluedog   Jul-27-07 12:30 PM   #36 
     - True, once again.  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 12:46 PM   #47 
        - You guys keep dragging David and Cindy into this and then  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:58 PM   #54 
        - So do I,  mzmolly   Jul-27-07 01:05 PM   #57 
           - David has a website might respond to a question.  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:11 PM   #60 
              - his Bio say she also work for Kucinich?  bluedog   Jul-27-07 01:32 PM   #66 
                 - Yep. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:37 PM   #71 
        - Cindy's a politician running for office now,  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:03 PM   #56 
           - Which is why Swanson et. al's anti-Conyers/anti-Pelosi smears/lies so blatantly violate DU's rules.  FreepFryer   Jul-27-07 01:09 PM   #59 
           - David Swanson was active on impeachment long before she was  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:15 PM   #61 
              - So, maybe he was part of the group who urged her to run?  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:25 PM   #65 
                 - The impeachment movement's goal isn't to defeat Democrats  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:35 PM   #68 
                    - Cindy's goal is to defeat a Democrat.  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:43 PM   #74 
                       - The topic of the OP is impeachment, not Cindy Sheehan. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:44 PM   #75 
                          - The topic is Sheehan's opinion of the impeachment  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:46 PM   #76 
                             - You might want to reread it. Have you watched the segment? n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:47 PM   #77 
                             - Yes I've read it. I don't take anything that Sheehan  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:54 PM   #79 
                                - This wasn't The Cindy Show but if that's what you make of it  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:55 PM   #81 
                                   - I never said it was the Cindy show,  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 02:01 PM   #83 
                             - It's a DEBATE between THREE people!! She isn't debating herself!  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 01:50 PM   #78 
                                - I never said she was debating herself.  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 01:55 PM   #80 
                                   - You said this was only showing her POV! It isn't.  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 01:57 PM   #82 
                                      - What I said in effect was that  seasonedblue   Jul-27-07 02:08 PM   #84 
     - But that doesn't address the post you were responding to.  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:31 PM   #37 
        - until we all hear or read a statement from him  bluedog   Jul-27-07 12:37 PM   #39 
           - Which is why we were looking for a direct quote. So, actually  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:38 PM   #41 
              - May 18, 2006; No Rush to Impeachment  bluedog   Jul-27-07 12:49 PM   #49 
                 - That's what we were trying to figure out. Here's what he said  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:55 PM   #52 
                 - Far as I can tell, he hasn't changed his mind...  FreepFryer   Jul-27-07 01:01 PM   #55 
  - Thanks!  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 12:23 PM   #26 
  - I clicked the MP3 link to hear the interview and all I'm hearing  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 12:41 PM   #44 
  - It's generally 15 minutes into the show, after the headlines.n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:42 PM   #45 
     - Thanks! I got aggravated so I stopped the MP3 and closed  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 12:48 PM   #48 
        - Sure! I love that show, watch it every morning!  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 12:50 PM   #50 
           - That was a good interview of all three.  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 01:20 PM   #62 
              - Yep. I was suprised that former Joementum aide sounded  sfexpat2000   Jul-27-07 01:36 PM   #69 
                 - I was surprised too! I was expecting  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 01:40 PM   #72 
  - Last week, I posted: "Can we cut the BULLSHIT? - IT'S ABOUT THE OIL..."  Junkdrawer   Jul-27-07 01:06 PM   #58 
  - Raise your hand if you think the Senate has the votes....here's the procedure.  madfloridian   Jul-27-07 01:20 PM   #63 
  - so you'ld need 20 Republican senators to be in danger of losing their seats in '08  TheBaldyMan   Jul-27-07 08:15 PM   #95 
  - k&r  Swamp Rat   Jul-27-07 05:58 PM   #92 
     - Beautiful!!!  Breeze54   Jul-27-07 06:00 PM   #94 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC