EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
| 53. Are they posting to this thread? I must have them on ignore |
|
because I don't see them!
|
| -DN!: Should Impeachment Be Off The Table? Debate With Cindy Sheehan, Ex-CIA Analyst Ray McGovern... |
babylonsister |
Jul-27-07 09:25 AM |
#0 |
 -
Thanks for that. |
mmonk |
Jul-27-07 09:27 AM |
#1 |
| -
I listened |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 09:30 AM |
#2 |
| -
K&R |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jul-27-07 09:31 AM |
#3 |
| -
On Now. nt |
babylonsister |
Jul-27-07 10:11 AM |
#4 |
| -
45% approval, 80 town or city measures, 15 sponsors for |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:14 AM |
#5 |
| -
A lot of the evidence for impeachment was presented to |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:31 AM |
#6 |
  -
I caught that; but I had my doubts about that |
babylonsister |
Jul-27-07 10:36 AM |
#9 |
| -
He's actually much better than I thought he would be! |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:39 AM |
#10 |
| -
Why do Swanson and Sheehan continue to allow a dishonest characterization of what Conyers said to be |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 10:33 AM |
#7 |
| -
Why not call his office? They should be able to answer that question. |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:34 AM |
#8 |
| -
Talking with them now. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 10:44 AM |
#12 |
| -
Transcript of Conyers on Amy's show 2/2007: |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:48 AM |
#14 |
| -
Which to me says "I want to build a strong case." |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 10:54 AM |
#16 |
| -
calling John Conyer's office for an exact quote might help |
leftchick |
Jul-27-07 10:40 AM |
#11 |
| -
Just did "Conyers has not said he will NEVER impeach ... the off the table comment was made by |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 10:47 AM |
#13 |
| -
See my post above. The problem isn't, to my mind, that |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 10:50 AM |
#15 |
| -
I dont know that he wants to give these people more attention? |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 10:55 AM |
#17 |
| -
What about those other people, the million people who signed |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 11:30 AM |
#18 |
| -
Yep. |
mmonk |
Jul-27-07 11:38 AM |
#19 |
| -
Call and ask for an official statement if you like? |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 11:49 AM |
#20 |
| -
The idea would not be to continue the conflict but to clear up |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:24 PM |
#28 |
| -
I don't think that's possible |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 12:39 PM |
#42 |
| -
"these people"?? |
leftchick |
Jul-27-07 12:00 PM |
#21 |
| -
I signed the petition as well. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 12:08 PM |
#22 |
| -
So you are saying the party is in peril? Gotcha. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:23 PM |
#27 |
| -
Dr. Dean won't impeach either?! |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:24 PM |
#30 |
| -
What your group is doing is not funny. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:27 PM |
#32 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jul-27-07 12:29 PM |
#35 |
| -
I have very little support here at all. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:33 PM |
#38 |
| -
He told them to focus on the November 08 elections |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 12:17 PM |
#23 |
| -
He told "THEM" to focus on the elections, he did not say that he would not do his job |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 12:44 PM |
#46 |
| -
From those who met with him on Monday: |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 01:23 PM |
#64 |
| -
Still no quotes, just paraphrased schmear. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 01:34 PM |
#67 |
| -
And even more from that same article: |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 01:37 PM |
#70 |
| -
... which is why I defer to John Nichols and not more paraphrasing and innuendo. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 01:41 PM |
#73 |
| -
John Nichols was in the office with Conyers? |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 03:24 PM |
#85 |
| -
Nichols is a constitutional expert who clarified that neither Conyers or Pelosi can bring about |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 03:31 PM |
#86 |
| -
I have already posted that |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 03:39 PM |
#87 |
| -
You posted what each of them said, sans what Conyers said. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 03:42 PM |
#88 |
| -
But that would be hearsay |
proud2Blib |
Jul-27-07 04:01 PM |
#90 |
| -
A quote is a quote. A paraphrase is shit. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 05:54 PM |
#91 |
| -
Nice. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 03:50 PM |
#89 |
| -
Thanks MF |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 05:58 PM |
#93 |
| -
Cindy's supporters are determined to hurt a good man, aren't they? |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:20 PM |
#24 |
| -
What spin? When I posted that, I was trying to answer a question. |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:22 PM |
#25 |
| -
One post after the other. How am I out of line? Explain, please. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:24 PM |
#29 |
| -
You are characterizing me as someone who wants to hurt Mr. Conyers |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:27 PM |
#33 |
| -
Oh, well, then. Have your conversation. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:38 PM |
#40 |
| -
Stay if you like but it's pretty hard to hold a conversation |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:40 PM |
#43 |
| -
Oh, gee, I am so glad there have been no accusations flying... |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:55 PM |
#51 |
| -
Are they posting to this thread? I must have them on ignore |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:56 PM |
#53 |
| -
what some do not get is it...the votes |
bluedog |
Jul-27-07 12:27 PM |
#31 |
| -
They are trying to hurt Democrats. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 12:29 PM |
#34 |
| -
many of us are so tired of this ........... |
bluedog |
Jul-27-07 12:30 PM |
#36 |
| -
True, once again. |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 12:46 PM |
#47 |
| -
You guys keep dragging David and Cindy into this and then |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:58 PM |
#54 |
| -
So do I, |
mzmolly |
Jul-27-07 01:05 PM |
#57 |
| -
David has a website might respond to a question. |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:11 PM |
#60 |
| -
his Bio say she also work for Kucinich? |
bluedog |
Jul-27-07 01:32 PM |
#66 |
| -
Yep. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:37 PM |
#71 |
| -
Cindy's a politician running for office now, |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:03 PM |
#56 |
| -
Which is why Swanson et. al's anti-Conyers/anti-Pelosi smears/lies so blatantly violate DU's rules. |
FreepFryer |
Jul-27-07 01:09 PM |
#59 |
| -
David Swanson was active on impeachment long before she was |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:15 PM |
#61 |
| -
So, maybe he was part of the group who urged her to run? |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:25 PM |
#65 |
| -
The impeachment movement's goal isn't to defeat Democrats |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:35 PM |
#68 |
| -
Cindy's goal is to defeat a Democrat. |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:43 PM |
#74 |
| -
The topic of the OP is impeachment, not Cindy Sheehan. n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:44 PM |
#75 |
| -
The topic is Sheehan's opinion of the impeachment |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:46 PM |
#76 |
| -
You might want to reread it. Have you watched the segment? n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:47 PM |
#77 |
| -
Yes I've read it. I don't take anything that Sheehan |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:54 PM |
#79 |
| -
This wasn't The Cindy Show but if that's what you make of it |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:55 PM |
#81 |
| -
I never said it was the Cindy show, |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 02:01 PM |
#83 |
| -
It's a DEBATE between THREE people!! She isn't debating herself! |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 01:50 PM |
#78 |
| -
I never said she was debating herself. |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 01:55 PM |
#80 |
| -
You said this was only showing her POV! It isn't. |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 01:57 PM |
#82 |
| -
What I said in effect was that |
seasonedblue |
Jul-27-07 02:08 PM |
#84 |
| -
But that doesn't address the post you were responding to. |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:31 PM |
#37 |
| -
until we all hear or read a statement from him |
bluedog |
Jul-27-07 12:37 PM |
#39 |
| -
Which is why we were looking for a direct quote. So, actually |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:38 PM |
#41 |
| -
May 18, 2006; No Rush to Impeachment |
bluedog |
Jul-27-07 12:49 PM |
#49 |
| -
That's what we were trying to figure out. Here's what he said |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:55 PM |
#52 |
| -
Far as I can tell, he hasn't changed his mind... |
FreepFryer |
Jul-27-07 01:01 PM |
#55 |
| -
Thanks! |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 12:23 PM |
#26 |
| -
I clicked the MP3 link to hear the interview and all I'm hearing |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 12:41 PM |
#44 |
| -
It's generally 15 minutes into the show, after the headlines.n/t |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:42 PM |
#45 |
| -
Thanks! I got aggravated so I stopped the MP3 and closed |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 12:48 PM |
#48 |
| -
Sure! I love that show, watch it every morning! |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 12:50 PM |
#50 |
| -
That was a good interview of all three. |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 01:20 PM |
#62 |
| -
Yep. I was suprised that former Joementum aide sounded |
sfexpat2000 |
Jul-27-07 01:36 PM |
#69 |
| -
I was surprised too! I was expecting |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 01:40 PM |
#72 |
| -
Last week, I posted: "Can we cut the BULLSHIT? - IT'S ABOUT THE OIL..." |
Junkdrawer |
Jul-27-07 01:06 PM |
#58 |
| -
Raise your hand if you think the Senate has the votes....here's the procedure. |
madfloridian |
Jul-27-07 01:20 PM |
#63 |
| -
so you'ld need 20 Republican senators to be in danger of losing their seats in '08 |
TheBaldyMan |
Jul-27-07 08:15 PM |
#95 |
| -
k&r |
Swamp Rat |
Jul-27-07 05:58 PM |
#92 |
| -
Beautiful!!! |
Breeze54 |
Jul-27-07 06:00 PM |
#94 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread