Reply #122: Thanks for your response...

[Psyop Samurai]

Your regard for Conyers is duly noted and given serious weight. It seems we're in basic agreement, as you feel it's fine to address him on the issue, but not to trash him, (though I may have a higher threshold on what constitutes a "hit piece").

Obviously the activists are not without fault, nor above criticism.

What troubles me is the deliberate making a mountain out of a molehill and mean-spirited fanning of flames that has met their alleged indiscretions. Also, the unwarranted disregard for a DUer like sfexpat2000 (who's practically a saint), by refusing to concede basic facts because their priorities are different, or feel that they've been offended in some way.

I would only ask DUers, before you hit that "Post message" button, are you being fully honest with yourself, or are you trying to score points?

:toast: