You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #196: so you missed the point too [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #194
196. so you missed the point too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Dave Lindorff: Office Arrest: The Shame of John Conyers babylonsister  Jul-23-07 10:19 PM   #0 
  - I'll take John Conyers and his  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:22 PM   #1 
  - Exactly.  brentspeak   Jul-23-07 10:24 PM   #2 
  - I love him, but I don't necessarily agree with this point. He's putting off  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:25 PM   #3 
  - I will niot  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-23-07 10:40 PM   # 
  - can you be a bit more obscure?  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:41 PM   #22 
     - Conyers was in Congress in '88  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-23-07 10:50 PM   #34 
        - Dukakis was an idiot  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:53 PM   #38 
           - Just like junior will never be impeached  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-24-07 12:10 AM   #170 
              - according to DU  mzteris   Jul-24-07 10:16 AM   #250 
  - oh really? did you read that whole article? and if what you said  orleans   Jul-23-07 11:28 PM   #103 
  - the FEMA trailers you mentioned: Cindy doesn't seem to give a shit about them either, you know  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 12:56 AM   #184 
  - did you really miss that fucking point?  orleans   Jul-24-07 01:13 AM   #193 
     - so the Sheehan crowd attacks Dems for not being single-minded enough on issues,  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 01:15 AM   #194 
        - so you missed the point too  orleans   Jul-24-07 01:17 AM   #196 
           - fine, enlighten me. What's the point?  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 01:19 AM   #198 
              - my point was that here is bush & his fema pals fucking people  orleans   Jul-24-07 02:11 AM   #211 
                 - Which comes back to my point.  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 02:13 AM   #212 
                    - yes.  orleans   Jul-24-07 02:15 AM   #213 
                       - I want it all, and I want it right now  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 02:23 AM   #214 
                          - Deleted message  Name removed   Jul-24-07 08:20 PM   #269 
  - IS EVERYONE TAKING CRAZY PILLS?????  mzteris   Jul-24-07 10:30 AM   #253 
  - THANK YOU!  struggle4progress   Jul-23-07 11:55 PM   #152 
  - Agreed. nt  Drum   Jul-24-07 01:08 AM   #188 
  - even if he's wrong? brilliant!  tomp   Jul-24-07 07:05 AM   #228 
  - If he won't bring impeachment hearings  speakclearly   Jul-24-07 09:53 AM   #248 
  - I don't understand why they're picking on Conyers  wtmusic   Jul-23-07 10:26 PM   #4 
  - Maybe because he's said he's pro-impeachment, needs a few  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:29 PM   #7 
  - Because he chairs the committee that would begin the process.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 10:32 PM   #11 
  - Phew - thanks! nt  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:34 PM   #13 
  - This day goes into the Annals of Heartbreak all around.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 10:35 PM   #15 
     - ....all around.....all around...n/t  KoKo01   Jul-24-07 08:53 PM   #270 
  - OK fair enough nt  wtmusic   Jul-23-07 10:50 PM   #35 
     - John Conyers comes out to all the DC anti war events --  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:22 PM   #88 
  - Also, Conyers authored a bill in Dec 2005 that mentioned investigations and  PBass   Jul-24-07 01:23 AM   #200 
  - Conyers doesn't seem to realize it's a fight to the death. Bush and Cheney, do, though.  WinkyDink   Jul-24-07 03:10 AM   #217 
  - By votes, does he mean in the House or Senate?  mmonk   Jul-23-07 10:28 PM   #5 
  - I trust Mr. Conyers. Imho, something else is going on here. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 10:38 PM   #18 
  - Any idea?  mmonk   Jul-23-07 10:47 PM   #29 
  - The Dems have been out of power for a long time. They don't  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 10:54 PM   #41 
     - His Options Are Limited  KharmaTrain   Jul-23-07 11:37 PM   #117 
     - I sort of look at it exactly in the reverse.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:42 PM   # 
     - without solid evidence ????  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 12:09 AM   #169 
        - A Criminal Indictment Or Referal  KharmaTrain   Jul-24-07 12:19 AM   #176 
        - A federal judge  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 12:30 AM   #177 
        - Sorry, No Cigar  KharmaTrain   Jul-24-07 12:53 AM   #182 
           - Well,  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 12:59 AM   #187 
              - Exactly  KharmaTrain   Jul-24-07 01:13 AM   #191 
                 - But voting articles of Impeachment  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 01:27 AM   #201 
                    - Do You Press An Indictment Without Charges?  KharmaTrain   Jul-24-07 01:39 AM   #207 
                       - "Inquiry of Impeachment"  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 02:06 AM   #208 
        - I like the way you think.nt  bemildred   Jul-24-07 12:32 AM   #178 
        - Wow, is that a real picture?  EstimatedProphet   Jul-24-07 11:43 AM   #259 
           - So begin an Impeachment investigation and get the evedence.  Truth2Tell   Jul-25-07 12:03 AM   #274 
              - Well, wouldn't it be better to have the evidence then start the investigation?  EstimatedProphet   Jul-25-07 06:42 AM   #275 
     - the political argument is so repulsive  mikelgb   Jul-24-07 02:33 PM   #268 
  - I agree  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:00 PM   #47 
  - I do too, I don't think all the blame should be on Conyers  alyce douglas   Jul-24-07 07:32 AM   #230 
  - Yeah... I Want To Know That Too !!!  WillyT   Jul-23-07 11:11 PM   #65 
  - Senate  Lilith Velkor   Jul-23-07 11:15 PM   #76 
  - WTF?  southerncrone   Jul-23-07 10:29 PM   #6 
  - Conyers talked with them and they still threw a fit  KingFlorez   Jul-23-07 10:29 PM   #8 
  - They've Turned Into A Bunch Of Ineffective Tantrum Throwing Children.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 10:32 PM   #10 
     - Yes, almost as bad as the founding fathers, yet less violent.  John Q. Citizen   Jul-23-07 11:01 PM   #49 
     - And they didn't throw any tea in the harbor either  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:03 PM   #54 
     - Except they're targeting the patriots, not the king's men. {nt}  Aya Reiko   Jul-23-07 11:20 PM   #86 
     - If they are patriots, why not impeach and defund the war? Or is that too simple?  John Q. Citizen   Jul-23-07 11:56 PM   #153 
        - So maybe they should start burning down Starbucks...  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:17 AM   #239 
        - What's your definition of meaningful?  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 11:21 AM   #255 
     - The Founding Fathers were not violent men..  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 11:24 AM   #257 
     - Sadly  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:44 PM   #134 
  - When It Gets To The Point That These Fuckers Are Attacking Conyers, There's No Longer Doubt That  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 10:30 PM   #9 
  - First time? I don't think so. YOU overreact. And I'm not doing this with  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:32 PM   #12 
  - Yes, The First Time.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 10:37 PM   #16 
     - Um...  WillyT   Jul-23-07 10:40 PM   #20 
     - Yup. More Insane Ramblings From ADS.org. They've Lost Their Minds.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 10:42 PM   #23 
     - Pot.  motocicleta   Jul-23-07 11:04 PM   #55 
     - LOL !!!  WillyT   Jul-23-07 11:08 PM   #62 
     - I have 2 posters on ignore...could it be they are both in this little spat???  sofedupwithbush   Jul-23-07 11:51 PM   #146 
     - Yes After Downing Street is just as bad as extremists who murder  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:16 PM   #77 
     - What part of 'they don't have the votes' doesn't DU understand?  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 10:43 PM   #24 
     - Then they have their work cut out for them...  Mme. Defarge   Jul-23-07 10:53 PM   #39 
     - How do you get repuke support for impeachment....  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:04 PM   #56 
     - I'd go for shame  Mme. Defarge   Jul-23-07 11:14 PM   #73 
     - you don't need to "get a repuke" to support impeachment  orleans   Jul-23-07 11:45 PM   #137 
        - But to get them out of office, you need two thirds in the senate...  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:53 PM   #149 
           - I truly think it's coming. And I'm an optimist, but I don't see any other recourse.  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 12:17 AM   #175 
           - here's a little story  orleans   Jul-24-07 01:12 AM   #190 
              - It's not about what buch/cheney deserve...  cynatnite   Jul-24-07 01:34 AM   #205 
     - No. It is the job of the grassroots to get out and educate the public.  struggle4progress   Jul-23-07 11:58 PM   #158 
     - You gets the votes  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 10:55 PM   #44 
     - Confusing, isn't it?  mmonk   Jul-24-07 12:37 AM   #180 
        - Not really.  Mme. Defarge   Jul-24-07 12:23 PM   #262 
     - Could You... Maybe Take A Look At This ???  WillyT   Jul-23-07 11:03 PM   #52 
        - So what is it about impeachment?  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:08 PM   #63 
        - One More Time...  WillyT   Jul-23-07 11:16 PM   #78 
        - So it'd make him look bad?  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:24 PM   #93 
           - It Puts The Evidence Out There In The Public Domain, Over The Public Airwaves, And..  WillyT   Jul-23-07 11:31 PM   #105 
              - Nope...  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:41 PM   #126 
              - Then we do nothing and let them shread the constution  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-24-07 03:12 AM   #218 
                 - It seems that the Dems are working hard on bringing all the fraud  Cookie wookie   Jul-24-07 04:13 AM   #224 
              - Does anyone think that the corporate media, in their current compicit  Cookie wookie   Jul-24-07 03:55 AM   #222 
        - He wouldn't be able to veto any more bills  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:19 PM   #81 
        - Do think that there is more of a chance of removing bush...  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:27 PM   #99 
        - Ok, let's try it once again  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:19 PM   #82 
           - Do you think bush would do the country a favor and resign? n/t  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:26 PM   #96 
              - He'd resign  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:38 PM   #118 
              - Well, that I would hope for, too  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 11:44 PM   #133 
              - I am waiting for * to crack up on camera.  alyce douglas   Jul-24-07 07:41 AM   #234 
        - Beautiful!  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:42 PM   #128 
        - Someone tell this to Cindy WillyT  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:52 PM   #148 
        - BINGO!  Mme. Defarge   Jul-24-07 12:04 AM   #165 
     - I have his book too  Mojorabbit   Jul-23-07 11:11 PM   #66 
     - I'm DAMN disappointed  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:40 PM   #122 
     - Rosa Parks had a right to ride public transportation  jberryhill   Jul-23-07 11:39 PM   #121 
     - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Jul-23-07 11:41 PM   #125 
     - This shit has to stop  Marrah_G   Jul-24-07 07:56 AM   #237 
  - Totally agree, OMC  cynatnite   Jul-23-07 10:37 PM   #17 
  - Attacking him? How did they attack him? What am I missing here?  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:02 PM   #51 
  - Good. They were very effective then. They actually got you to feel something.  John Q. Citizen   Jul-23-07 11:19 PM   #80 
  - Yep, they got me to redirect my anger from Bush to them...  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:39 AM   #246 
     - Were you angry at bush because he is trashing our constitution, or because he's GOP?  John Q. Citizen   Jul-24-07 09:58 AM   #249 
        - I'm angry at those who would..  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 11:16 AM   #254 
           - True, they fully funded the surge and they passed the demand that Iraq  John Q. Citizen   Jul-24-07 12:45 PM   #264 
  - Exactly. So the solution to the corrupt GOP and Bush regime  JerseygirlCT   Jul-24-07 07:44 AM   #235 
  - I'll take a mother that lost her son in Iraq,  bemildred   Jul-23-07 10:35 PM   #14 
  - me 2.  BleedingHeartPatriot   Jul-23-07 10:39 PM   #19 
  - And count me in there also! Me three! eom.  wildbilln864   Jul-23-07 11:12 PM   #68 
  - And THAT is how easy the argument is. Thank you. nt  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:41 PM   #21 
  - And You Wonder Why I Issue The Charge Of Narrow Mindedness.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 10:43 PM   #25 
     - I threw you off awhile ago; we don't agree, let's not talk. Bye. nt  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:47 PM   #30 
  - and the other Three Thousand Six Hundred Thirty Five Mothers?  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:44 PM   #27 
  - Did you have someone particular in mind?  bemildred   Jul-23-07 10:48 PM   #32 
  - The point is -  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:54 PM   #42 
     - A pass from whom? nt  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:02 PM   #50 
        - anyone.  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:05 PM   #58 
           - She gets a pass from me. But I guess I'm nobody.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:08 PM   #64 
              - NOBODY GETS A PASS.  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:13 PM   #71 
                 - You seem angry. You won't think well when you are mad. nt  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:21 PM   #87 
                    - Yeah. A bit.  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:28 PM   #102 
                       - I never go to the lounge.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:32 PM   #109 
                          - You should never go to the Lounge.  mzteris   Jul-24-07 10:28 AM   #251 
  - I try to listen to everyone. Who am I not hearing? Please send me  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:51 PM   #36 
     - It's called getting a damn dem elected. n/t  mzteris   Jul-23-07 10:54 PM   #43 
        - Oh, right. Electing Dems automatically ends war???  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:03 PM   #53 
        - actually -  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:07 PM   #60 
           - You've got THAT right!  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:14 PM   #75 
        - We did that last November - remember?  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:23 PM   #90 
  - Me too  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:13 PM   #70 
  - oh yeah -  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:14 PM   #74 
     - Name one member of Congress who has worked harder to end the war  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:27 PM   #97 
        - nevermind  mzteris   Jul-23-07 11:32 PM   #107 
        - Yep I didn't think you could name even one  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:39 PM   #120 
           - bwa ha ha ha ha  mzteris   Jul-24-07 09:48 PM   #273 
        - Dennis Kucinich  ProudDad   Jul-23-07 11:45 PM   #136 
        - Crickets...Is Mzteris still looking?  sofedupwithbush   Jul-23-07 11:49 PM   #142 
  - Have to agree...  SledDriver   Jul-23-07 11:38 PM   #119 
  - I don't get how she's trying to bring the troops home? She appears to have changed  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:49 PM   #143 
  - I am in total agreement!  leftchick   Jul-24-07 05:07 AM   #227 
  - In 1988 the Dems also felt they had the WH sown  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-23-07 10:43 PM   #26 
  - Maybe they didn't want Dukakis to win.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 10:46 PM   #28 
  - So here is the logical question  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-23-07 10:49 PM   #33 
     - I think they want to win in 2008, a Democrat president.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:01 PM   #48 
     - The elites of both parties seem to me to be joined at the hip.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:13 PM   #72 
        - Yeah, that's one way to put it.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:20 PM   #85 
        - There does seem to be some kind of gridlock happening.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:27 PM   #101 
           - The gridlock is deliberate, it's a stall.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:30 PM   #104 
              - Sure it does. Our system is totally dysfunctional right now.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:33 PM   #110 
        - So you call Conyers elite? And you advocate 3rd party?  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:23 PM   #91 
           - No. I did not call Mr. Conyers an elite and I am not advocating  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:24 PM   #94 
  - You don't get enough attention; you are a history major, right? I think,  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 10:58 PM   #46 
  - I hold a masters in the stuff  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-24-07 12:15 AM   #173 
  - There's a lot of time left between now and the election..  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:27 AM   #241 
  - These attacks on the Dems on our side will backfire on all of us.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 10:48 PM   #31 
  - No they won't. What are they going to do to us? What can they take away?  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:07 PM   #61 
     - Then go right ahead. Give it all back to the GOP.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:26 PM   #95 
     - No, that wasn't my plan, either. nt  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:37 PM   #116 
     - Why does this make you so angry? I look at it as whatever helps the cause, but  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 12:36 AM   #179 
        - If you don't get it, I don't know how to explain it.  madfloridian   Jul-24-07 01:29 AM   #203 
        - I can't believe this OP was not deleted  Marrah_G   Jul-24-07 08:18 AM   #240 
        - No, the "whatever helps the cause" meme is what got us here..  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:41 AM   #247 
     - Perhaps, then, we could organize against our enemies, instead of against our friends  struggle4progress   Jul-24-07 12:01 AM   #162 
        - I don't think that was the issue.  bemildred   Jul-24-07 12:09 AM   #168 
  - So he took the time to meet with her, explained they didn't have the votes....  ShaneGR   Jul-23-07 10:52 PM   #37 
  - Yes, they did throw tantrums.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 10:53 PM   #40 
  - It's not like she has any chance of unseating Pelosi...  ShaneGR   Jul-23-07 10:55 PM   #45 
     - It's not like San Francisco has passed resolutions to end the war  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:05 PM   #59 
     - Any Congressperson can be unseated, that's the way the system works.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:12 PM   #67 
        - Then should vote Pelosi out. Vote Cindy an independent in....  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:22 PM   #89 
           - Frankly, I don't see how electing Cyndy gives the Congress to the Republicans.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:27 PM   #100 
              - It is all about Cindy, isn't it?  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:31 PM   #106 
                 - Opinions will vary.  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:35 PM   #112 
                 - Actually, it's about impeachment and about pulling all our troups out of Iraq.  John Q. Citizen   Jul-23-07 11:47 PM   #139 
                    - How about Joementum instead of a good man like Conyers?  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:50 PM   #145 
                       - Joe isn't chair of the House Judiciary committee, but if you want to go protest him, have at it.  John Q. Citizen   Jul-24-07 01:22 AM   #199 
  - Yes, this group of citizens told Mr. Conyers that his answer  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:04 PM   #57 
  - What has this group, mostly PDA, said to Lieberman and others..  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:13 PM   #69 
     - If Senator LIEberman could have initiated the impeachment process  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:18 PM   #79 
        - Yes, they are attacking and ridiculing John Conyers.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:20 PM   #83 
           - You aren't paying attention. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:23 PM   #92 
           - I am not very smart.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:32 PM   #108 
              - Nobody wants to hurt JOHN CONYERS. He's a hero to the left.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:37 PM   #115 
              - Conyers is a nice man and I like him a lot. nt  bemildred   Jul-23-07 11:40 PM   #123 
              - "The Shame of John Conyers"....doesn't sound like he's a hero.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:40 PM   #124 
              - Yes,I think so. And that's sad, for everyone. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:44 PM   #135 
                 - This is a joke to you guys, about one-upping the rest of us.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:57 PM   #157 
                    - I don't think you're reading what I'm writing but that's all right.  sfexpat2000   Jul-24-07 12:07 AM   #166 
              - Really?  Marrah_G   Jul-24-07 08:09 AM   #238 
              - Finally!  clixtox   Jul-24-07 05:02 AM   #226 
           - How are they ridiculing him? Asking him to do his job is ridicule?  proud2Blib   Jul-23-07 11:36 PM   #113 
              - How about "The Shame of John Conyers"?  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:42 PM   #127 
                 - John Conyers isn't going to melt because an essayist wrote a title.  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:52 PM   #147 
                    - You guys are really heartless.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:56 PM   #155 
                       - Yeah. We're the heartless people who John Conyers himself  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:57 PM   #156 
                       - Yes...that's what's hard to deal with. He encouraged us...sent us e-mails with updates  KoKo01   Jul-24-07 09:01 PM   #271 
                       - Yep, black hearted devils, all of us.  bemildred   Jul-24-07 12:02 AM   #163 
  - And compared her to Rosa Parks?...  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:29 AM   #242 
  - I Thought Getting Arrested Was Part of the Plan for this Demonstration  AndyTiedye   Jul-23-07 11:20 PM   #84 
  - Now that we have ripped Conyers to shreds and Pelosi is the bad guy..  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:27 PM   #98 
  - Indeed. Anyone? What happens next? n/t  Drum   Jul-24-07 02:10 AM   #210 
  - Those of us defending Conyers are now the bad guys.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:34 PM   #111 
  - He is pharaoh and Cindy is Moses  Lilith Velkor   Jul-23-07 11:42 PM   #129 
  - Conyers is equivalent to the KKK...  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:30 AM   #243 
  - I love Conyers, and posted this OP. I want the right result to happen. Think  babylonsister   Jul-23-07 11:43 PM   #131 
     - Are you able to be a bit more specific about what you mean ?  midnight   Jul-24-07 12:13 AM   #172 
  - What's disgraceful is this nut trying to speak for Rosa Parks n/t  maximusveritas   Jul-23-07 11:37 PM   #114 
  - I won't attack Conyers because he's been a voice for truth  Raksha   Jul-23-07 11:48 PM   #140 
  - How dare anyone use the name of Rosa Parks  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:42 PM   #130 
  - Agreed.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:46 PM   #138 
  - Thanks,  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:56 PM   #154 
  - In precisely the same way Rosa Parks would dare  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:49 PM   #144 
  - I didn't say "how dare anyone protest" I said how dare anyone use the name of a personal  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:55 PM   #151 
     - And you shouldn't be surprised, given that Mr. Conyers has been  sfexpat2000   Jul-23-07 11:59 PM   #160 
        - I'm not surprised at the protest so much, but again at the use of a dead heroines name  mzmolly   Jul-24-07 12:02 AM   #164 
        - You say Mr. Conyers is with you....but you attack him?????  madfloridian   Jul-24-07 12:08 AM   #167 
        - Please show me where I have attacked John Conyers.  sfexpat2000   Jul-24-07 12:12 AM   #171 
        - There's no excuse for invoking Rosa Parks..  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:35 AM   #245 
           - Shameful? You know, Rosa Parks wasn't Rosa Parks when  sfexpat2000   Jul-24-07 12:27 PM   #263 
  - Exactly....it's beyond shameful....n/t  Virginia Dare   Jul-24-07 08:33 AM   #244 
  - Amen MzMolly!  annarbor   Jul-24-07 10:29 AM   #252 
     - Cutting off our collective nose to spite our face  mzmolly   Jul-24-07 01:38 PM   #267 
  - Many in this post are advocating 3rd party while attacking Conyers.  madfloridian   Jul-23-07 11:44 PM   #132 
  - Libertarians have been known to support her, and with her "taxes are unconstitutional"  mzmolly   Jul-24-07 12:00 AM   #161 
     - Second time I've asked for this  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 12:50 AM   #181 
        - A link to her Kos diary  LittleClarkie   Jul-24-07 03:17 AM   #219 
        - income taxes  Truth2Tell   Jul-24-07 04:03 AM   #223 
           - Perhaps someone will ask her?  mzmolly   Jul-24-07 01:35 PM   #266 
        - Sure  mzmolly   Jul-24-07 01:33 PM   #265 
  - fuck him  JI7   Jul-23-07 11:48 PM   #141 
  - "The shame of Dave Lindorff"  mzmolly   Jul-23-07 11:59 PM   #159 
     - "Dave Lindorff has no shame"  ellisonz   Jul-24-07 03:40 AM   #221 
  - So the left now has faces attached to our own breed of radical extremists...  MazeRat7   Jul-23-07 11:53 PM   #150 
  - Conyers is NOT the enemy...  JCMach1   Jul-24-07 12:16 AM   #174 
  - funny thing about Civil Disobedience: Sometimes you get arrested for breaking laws  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 12:54 AM   #183 
  - Ha-ha. God forbid anyone would stoop to that.  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 12:56 AM   #185 
     - she has been arrested before, and for her to attack Conyers is just pathetic  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 12:59 AM   #186 
        - BULLSHIT. It's her right. I'd have been there, too. Her and 50 other  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 01:10 AM   #189 
           - It is my right to take over a Congressman's office and hold press conferences? I did not know that  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 01:13 AM   #192 
           - Sorry, doll, but this had been advertised for weeks. Hell, I think it was  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 01:16 AM   #195 
              - if it was coreographed, then why the fuck are you making a big deal about it and attacking Conyers?  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 01:19 AM   #197 
                 - I posted an article; if you don't like it, that's okay.  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 01:28 AM   #202 
                    - since you offered no additional insight, it is assumed you agree with the article  ComerPerro   Jul-24-07 01:31 AM   #204 
                       - I think it was choreographed though I have no proof, and I agree with  babylonsister   Jul-24-07 01:35 AM   #206 
           - If you've been in Congressional offices, you know that the spaces are  Cookie wookie   Jul-24-07 04:18 AM   #225 
  - sounds like they wanted to be arrested  MonkeyFunk   Jul-24-07 02:07 AM   #209 
  - That's what I was thinking.  LostInAnomie   Jul-24-07 02:59 AM   #215 
  - If Rosa Parks had lived two years longer she might have wondered why they were protesting her friend  LittleClarkie   Jul-24-07 03:03 AM   #216 
  - A sad display. Conyers is our friend and best hope for justice.  LiberalHeart   Jul-24-07 03:25 AM   #220 
  - Sheehan jumped the shark some time ago.  robcon   Jul-24-07 07:08 AM   #229 
  - if john conyers or any other politician were to assure me...  tomp   Jul-24-07 07:33 AM   #231 
  - Er...if you're "conducting a sit in" you should expect to be arrested  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-24-07 07:36 AM   #232 
  - so he's claiming Rosa Parks's ghost's edorsement of his cause?  Enrique   Jul-24-07 07:36 AM   #233 
  - He presumes to speak for Rosa Parks??  Marrah_G   Jul-24-07 07:46 AM   #236 
  - Speaking pretty liberally for the late Ms. Parks, imo. nt  Bluebear   Jul-24-07 11:23 AM   #256 
  - He lost me at "Rosa Parks". When you resort to putting words in the mouths of the dead, it's  mondo joe   Jul-24-07 11:25 AM   #258 
  - You know what? I don't give a shit.  Jed Dilligan   Jul-24-07 12:02 PM   #260 
  - Playing the race card? Great job Lindorff  Truth Hurts A Lot   Jul-24-07 12:12 PM   #261 
  - Conyers has a wonderful record, but he is dead wrong on this.  Vidar   Jul-24-07 09:14 PM   #272 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC