You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: Interesting. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Interesting.
MSNBC had two reports on that. In the first ("Prosecutor: Libby destroyed Cheney memo"), it states, "Fitzgerald alleged that Libby in September 2003 'destroyed' a Cheney note just before Libby's first FBI interview ..."

In the update, an hour and 18 minutes later ("Prosecutor: Libby 'wiped out' Cheny memo"), it read, "Fitzgerald alleged that Libby in September 2003 'wiped out' a Cheney note .... It was not clear if Fitzgerald meant that the note was destroyed or that Libby had forgotten it."

From FDL, about a half an hour before the first MSNBC report: "VP notes -- Libby knew the note was in his file. But he wiped it out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Did "Fitz" go Easy on Cheney? KoKo01  Feb-06-07 04:42 PM   #0 
  - could be something else called EVIDENCE.  ray of light   Feb-06-07 04:45 PM   #1 
  - Did you hear Lawrence O'Donnell on Al Franken this morning?  Cleita   Feb-06-07 04:46 PM   #2 
  - "Da Man" being cheney/bush? I've always kept one eye open. You have to.  goforit   Feb-06-07 04:49 PM   #3 
  - Me too Who is in the secret indictment  lovuian   Feb-06-07 04:54 PM   #6 
     - Let's not forget, Cheney implicated himself AND Bush in this handwritten note!  Dems Will Win   Feb-06-07 06:09 PM   #20 
  - You can't be CHARGED as an unindicted co-conspirator  Crabby Appleton   Feb-06-07 04:50 PM   #4 
  - sorry....I'll edit the post... thanks. n/t  KoKo01   Feb-06-07 04:51 PM   #5 
  - I thought Darth Cheney testified  blogslut   Feb-06-07 04:59 PM   #7 
  - Yes...BUT, Fitz didn't put him "Under Oath." n/t  KoKo01   Feb-06-07 05:00 PM   #8 
     - And THAT'S the problem.  MyPetRock   Feb-06-07 05:03 PM   #11 
     - It's a crime to lie to a federal prosecutor during questioning, under oath or not  JulieRB   Feb-06-07 07:34 PM   #22 
     - It makes absolutely no  H2O Man   Feb-06-07 05:04 PM   #12 
     - That's my thinking that Cheney not being put "under oath" was good plucking  KoKo01   Feb-06-07 05:11 PM   #15 
     - Didn't they get Martha Stewart on lying to a Fed Investigator? I don't think she was u  OmmmSweetOmmm   Feb-06-07 05:16 PM   #17 
        - Correct. n/t  H2O Man   Feb-06-07 05:17 PM   #18 
     - Are you sure about that?  blogslut   Feb-06-07 05:04 PM   #13 
  - he has gone easy on the whole neocon cabal  leftofthedial   Feb-06-07 05:02 PM   #9 
  - This is TOTAL BS - Matters not whether Cheney was under oath - still faces Obstruction charge  leveymg   Feb-06-07 05:02 PM   #10 
  - Huh? leveymg...did you read my post...I don't understand what you are saying?  KoKo01   Feb-06-07 05:13 PM   #16 
     - Not saying you're full of it - it's Schuster  leveymg   Feb-07-07 08:12 AM   #25 
        - Interesting.  H2O Man   Feb-07-07 08:26 AM   #26 
           - Wiped It Out  Me.   Feb-07-07 08:49 AM   #27 
              - No, Marcy says that Fitz has that memo -  leveymg   Feb-07-07 03:58 PM   #28 
  - Doesn't matter  hawkowl88   Feb-06-07 05:05 PM   #14 
  - A Lot Of Second Guessing Going On  Me.   Feb-06-07 05:59 PM   #19 
  - If you are under oath and you cross your fingers behind your back,  Miss Chybil   Feb-06-07 06:51 PM   #21 
  - A comment re "conservative"  Morgana LaFey   Feb-06-07 08:16 PM   #23 
  - Yes  PhilipShore   Feb-06-07 08:16 PM   #24 
  - I think you nailed it, KoKo  Jack Rabbit   Feb-07-07 04:02 PM   #29 
  - Of course.  BuyingThyme   Feb-07-07 04:04 PM   #30 
  - The Fitz always thinks ahead.  cat_girl25   Feb-07-07 04:05 PM   #31 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC