You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: I called the # for the Judiciary Committee, which is: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I called the # for the Judiciary Committee, which is:
(202) 225-3951
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -So WHAT IS IT? Inherent Contempt Or Statutory Contempt- DAMN kpete  Jul-23-07 11:54 AM   #0 
  - I so hope that this is true  Bill219   Jul-23-07 11:56 AM   #1 
  - OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE OH PLEASE  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-23-07 11:56 AM   #2 
  - Please say it is so! n/t  citizen_jane   Jul-23-07 11:57 AM   #3 
  - That link is to Daily Kos. What gives?  Jackpine Radical   Jul-23-07 12:01 PM   #4 
  - sorry  kpete   Jul-23-07 12:03 PM   #6 
  - The guy who answered the phone confirmed that  annabanana   Jul-23-07 12:02 PM   #5 
  - Holy shit!  Cooley Hurd   Jul-23-07 12:05 PM   #7 
  - They can cuff them to heavy furniture or banisters  havocmom   Jul-23-07 12:07 PM   #10 
  - It IS a pretty picture isn't it..... .n/t  annabanana   Jul-23-07 12:08 PM   #13 
  - Oh, I dunno. I could get into a little bondage & discipline for the junta flunkies  havocmom   Jul-23-07 01:08 PM   #33 
  - Or 'cuff them in groups of six...  KansDem   Jul-23-07 02:21 PM   #37 
  - Holding facility  wayupnorth   Jul-23-07 01:03 PM   #32 
  - Frog March! n/t  rucky   Jul-23-07 12:05 PM   #8 
  - Who is this commenter Gioele?  Canuckistanian   Jul-23-07 12:05 PM   #9 
  - Don't know  kpete   Jul-23-07 12:07 PM   #11 
     - Good.  Canuckistanian   Jul-23-07 12:38 PM   #28 
  - Still just a maybe, but this is better news than I expected today!!  dkofos   Jul-23-07 12:08 PM   #12 
  - Where's the best basic explanation of inherent contempt?  emlev   Jul-23-07 12:08 PM   #14 
  - Wikipedia, for starters n/t  hisownpetard   Jul-23-07 12:39 PM   #29 
  - Here's a primer ...  TahitiNut   Jul-23-07 02:31 PM   #39 
  - EDIT- sorry to hear it now. What a disappointment. nm  dicksteele   Jul-23-07 12:08 PM   #15 
  - I'm so holding my breath. color me jaded.  Javaman   Jul-23-07 12:08 PM   #16 
  - I'm not sure about holding it. But something stopped for a second.  aquart   Jul-23-07 12:21 PM   #21 
  - You're not the only one who's jaded  notsodumbhillbilly   Jul-23-07 12:28 PM   #25 
  - WOOHOO!!!!!! YES! YES! YES!!!!  in_cog_ni_to   Jul-23-07 12:09 PM   #17 
  - The Fascists will not stand for Justice...  vmaus   Jul-23-07 12:09 PM   #18 
  - My thoughts exactly...Bush has already prepared for this possibility  Blaze Diem   Jul-23-07 12:25 PM   #23 
  - Yes!!!  bonito   Jul-23-07 12:18 PM   #19 
  - Doin' the HAPPY DANCE!!!  loudsue   Jul-23-07 12:21 PM   #20 
  - this regime's ignorance towards the law, will bite them on the ass.  alyce douglas   Jul-23-07 12:23 PM   #22 
  - HOT DAMN bush can't fluff this one off he has absolutely positively  Bitwit1234   Jul-23-07 12:26 PM   #24 
  - Even if it's just statutory contempt, they can always pull out the  BullGooseLoony   Jul-23-07 12:28 PM   #26 
  - Called and told the nice young man that I wanted to  hisownpetard   Jul-23-07 12:36 PM   #27 
  - Do you have Conyer's phone number?  senseandsensibility   Jul-23-07 12:57 PM   #30 
     - I called the # for the Judiciary Committee, which is:  hisownpetard   Jul-23-07 01:24 PM   #34 
        - Thanks  senseandsensibility   Jul-23-07 02:12 PM   #36 
  - It's Possible The Dems Are PURPOSELY Sending Mixed Signals  Beetwasher   Jul-23-07 01:02 PM   #31 
  - so this is like a congressional CT? ;) LOL nt  Javaman   Jul-23-07 01:32 PM   #35 
     - Actually, It's Just Politics  Beetwasher   Jul-23-07 04:30 PM   #40 
  - I was excited on Saturday  Karenina   Jul-23-07 02:23 PM   #38 
  - Isn't Statutory contempt better to start with?  yodermon   Jul-23-07 11:11 PM   #41 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC