You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: There's no evidence to suggest [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. There's no evidence to suggest
that 18 Republicans would vote to convict. It's a pretty safe prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Book sugestion nadinbrzezinski  Jul-22-07 12:53 AM   #0 
  - Oh, that is just so childish and extremist.  IChing   Jul-22-07 12:57 AM   #1 
  - You mrean recommmending a book? As soon as I  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:02 AM   #2 
  - and these books  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:04 AM   #3 
  - Where's the one that helps you read minds and predict the future?  sfexpat2000   Jul-22-07 01:06 AM   #4 
  - There's no evidence to suggest  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:26 AM   #15 
     - No. It's not a safe prediction with the rats lacing up their Nikes.  sfexpat2000   Jul-22-07 01:34 AM   #20 
        - No it is not, I see him doing that repeateadly  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:35 AM   #22 
        - So you don't like me disagreeing with you  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:43 AM   #27 
           - You follow it here.  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:50 AM   #30 
              - I post in a thread in GD  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:53 AM   #32 
        - Do you just  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:42 AM   #24 
           - "It's all a matter of perspective."  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:50 AM   #29 
           - This isn't about a value system  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:54 AM   #33 
              - Why don't you read the book?  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:59 AM   #37 
              - I object to your purposeful discouraging of activists. You've already  sfexpat2000   Jul-22-07 11:38 AM   #42 
           - False premise. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-22-07 11:26 AM   #41 
  - Oh my... you are allergic to history  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:06 AM   #5 
  - and here's the Magna Carta  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:21 AM   #12 
     - Ok I am feeling in the mood of discussing history  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:24 AM   #14 
        - I would be interested with that class discussion also  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:29 AM   #16 
           - I see...  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:31 AM   #19 
  - You need to finish those first before you work  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:08 AM   #7 
     - regardless of your insults  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:19 AM   #10 
        - Not to mention an impeachment.  IMModerate   Jul-22-07 02:34 PM   #46 
  - I think I'll pick it up tomorrow -- I just saw Nichols recently on Moyers  Emit   Jul-22-07 01:08 AM   #6 
  - They also mentioned him  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:15 AM   #9 
  - From the book for those allergic to histrory  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:14 AM   #8 
  - He was trying to say that a 2/3 vote was the only thing that "counted"  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:19 AM   #11 
  - I am allergic to trig and I never took calculus  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:23 AM   #13 
  - You have been so consistently wrong  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:29 AM   #17 
     - I have...  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:34 AM   #21 
     - When was I wrong?  IChing   Jul-22-07 01:39 AM   #23 
        - He is talking about me  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:43 AM   #26 
        - find one historical fact  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:52 AM   #31 
        - Here you go from the OFFICIAL Time line  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:55 AM   #34 
        - And on letters and telegrams you are right  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:57 AM   #36 
        - By the way, now that LINKS to official summations have  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 02:04 AM   #38 
        - Well good night, I will have to keep those two links handy  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 03:06 AM   #39 
        - correct  MonkeyFunk   Jul-22-07 01:56 AM   #35 
  - Some Gems  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:30 AM   #18 
  - More gems , on reagan and teh second bill of impeachment  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:42 AM   #25 
     - And on a personal note  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 01:45 AM   #28 
  - kick for monnin crew  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-22-07 09:02 AM   #40 
  - I see it as well  bonito   Jul-22-07 11:49 AM   #43 
  - Thanks for the suggestion. However it is my belief that history will show Nancy  mzmolly   Jul-22-07 01:28 PM   #44 
     - After the 2004 debacle, the whole "behind the scenes" thing  sfexpat2000   Jul-22-07 02:18 PM   #45 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC