You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #37: ad ignorantium. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-19-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. ad ignorantium.
Beautiful example, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How about a radical redefinition? Katherine Brengle  Jul-19-07 10:48 AM   #0 
  - bumped off the first page already... ouch. nt  Katherine Brengle   Jul-19-07 12:06 PM   #1 
  - This Seems To Make No Sense.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 12:19 PM   #2 
  - No, consent or lack thereof is not the default - that it is even a matter for  Katherine Brengle   Jul-19-07 02:43 PM   #5 
  - it is a satire along the lines of "a modest proposal" in other words not v. subtle  pitohui   Jul-19-07 04:46 PM   #18 
  - On Further Reply: I Read The Link Further. What An Out Of Her Mind Extremist That Is. Holy Cow.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 12:22 PM   #3 
  - What's insane or irrational about it?  Katherine Brengle   Jul-19-07 02:45 PM   #6 
     - Everything.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 02:55 PM   #10 
     - So explain why. nt  Katherine Brengle   Jul-20-07 08:38 AM   #38 
     - quote: "...the plan criminalizes all male participants in heterosexual sex"  pitohui   Jul-19-07 04:58 PM   #20 
  - there is nothing radical in her blog -- even heterosexual sex = submission to male dom is played out  aikoaiko   Jul-19-07 12:41 PM   #4 
  - how does the woman who is perpetually assumed to be saying "no"  leftofthedial   Jul-19-07 02:47 PM   #7 
  - Hmm, the same way you know that the default position of someone  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 03:01 PM   #13 
  - My point is that I think that is already the assumption  leftofthedial   Jul-19-07 03:51 PM   #14 
     - Thank you, for taking the time to reply and set me "straight"  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 03:59 PM   #16 
        - don't  leftofthedial   Jul-19-07 05:40 PM   #31 
  - Would make men think twice before whipping it out, eh? Actually having to be  Katherine Brengle   Jul-20-07 08:43 AM   #42 
  - Funny stuff.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 02:49 PM   #8 
  - Wow! And all the "out of the chute" responses are from men  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 02:54 PM   #9 
  - Extremism Is Extremism.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 02:56 PM   #11 
  - How expectedly ad hominem of you to say so. n/t  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 03:00 PM   #12 
     - You Need To Educate Yourself On The Definition Of Ad Hominem, Prior To Its Future Use.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 03:58 PM   #15 
        - And another ad hominem. Thank you for yet another example  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 04:44 PM   #17 
           - You Should've Taken My Advice. You Obviously Have No Idea How To Determine An Ad Hominem.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 05:06 PM   #21 
              - You're being sarcastic, right?  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 05:10 PM   #22 
                 - Ok Bornablahblah, Point Out The Ad Hominems Prior Please.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 05:13 PM   #23 
                    - "That article is extremism to all sorts of irrational degrees."  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 05:14 PM   #24 
                       - That's Not An Ad Hominem.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 05:17 PM   #25 
                          - That's another one right there.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 05:19 PM   #26 
                             - I Think You Need To Read Your Own Link Pal.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 05:25 PM   #28 
                                - See also the "shoot the messenger" subdivision of ad hominem.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 05:27 PM   #30 
                                   - What On Earth Are You Talking About? Not A Surprise You Can't Defend Your Position.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 06:01 PM   #32 
                                      - And that whole post is another example of an ad hominem.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 06:05 PM   #33 
                                         - ROFLMAO!!!! You Just Can't Do It! Keep Deflecting Away Pal, But You're Still Losing.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 06:21 PM   #34 
                                            - Yes, yes.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 06:22 PM   #35 
                                               - Dude, You're Done. You've Been Thoroughly Defeated... Again.  OPERATIONMINDCRIME   Jul-19-07 06:36 PM   #36 
                                                  - ad ignorantium.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 06:41 PM   #37 
  - The definition of words does not depend on the gender of who wrote the definition.  Bornaginhooligan   Jul-19-07 04:49 PM   #19 
  - But, not all crimes require the victim prove that they did not contribute  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 05:20 PM   #27 
  - There is a difference.  Katherine Brengle   Jul-20-07 08:45 AM   #43 
  - Exactly -- if I am robbed, I am the victim - If I am murdered, I am the victim -  Katherine Brengle   Jul-20-07 08:40 AM   #40 
     - Not only do you have to prove you were the victim,  Cerridwen   Jul-20-07 09:27 AM   #44 
        - Exactly. As one poster said over at IBTP,  Katherine Brengle   Jul-21-07 08:41 AM   #45 
  - If the default setting were yes, there wouldn't be any rape laws at all.  JVS   Jul-19-07 05:26 PM   #29 
     - Historically, rape laws were to protect the interests of the family;  Cerridwen   Jul-20-07 08:39 AM   #39 
     - The default right now is that a woman can only be raped in certain circumstances  Katherine Brengle   Jul-20-07 08:42 AM   #41 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC