HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-19-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
Beautiful example, actually.
|
| -How about a radical redefinition? |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-19-07 10:48 AM |
#0 |
 -
bumped off the first page already... ouch. nt |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-19-07 12:06 PM |
#1 |
| -
This Seems To Make No Sense. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 12:19 PM |
#2 |
 -
No, consent or lack thereof is not the default - that it is even a matter for |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-19-07 02:43 PM |
#5 |
 -
it is a satire along the lines of "a modest proposal" in other words not v. subtle |
pitohui |
Jul-19-07 04:46 PM |
#18 |
| -
On Further Reply: I Read The Link Further. What An Out Of Her Mind Extremist That Is. Holy Cow. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 12:22 PM |
#3 |
| -
What's insane or irrational about it? |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-19-07 02:45 PM |
#6 |
| -
Everything. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 02:55 PM |
#10 |
| -
So explain why. nt |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-20-07 08:38 AM |
#38 |
| -
quote: "...the plan criminalizes all male participants in heterosexual sex" |
pitohui |
Jul-19-07 04:58 PM |
#20 |
| -
there is nothing radical in her blog -- even heterosexual sex = submission to male dom is played out |
aikoaiko |
Jul-19-07 12:41 PM |
#4 |
| -
how does the woman who is perpetually assumed to be saying "no" |
leftofthedial |
Jul-19-07 02:47 PM |
#7 |
| -
Hmm, the same way you know that the default position of someone |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 03:01 PM |
#13 |
| -
My point is that I think that is already the assumption |
leftofthedial |
Jul-19-07 03:51 PM |
#14 |
| -
Thank you, for taking the time to reply and set me "straight" |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 03:59 PM |
#16 |
| -
don't |
leftofthedial |
Jul-19-07 05:40 PM |
#31 |
| -
Would make men think twice before whipping it out, eh? Actually having to be |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-20-07 08:43 AM |
#42 |
| -
Funny stuff. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 02:49 PM |
#8 |
| -
Wow! And all the "out of the chute" responses are from men |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 02:54 PM |
#9 |
| -
Extremism Is Extremism. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 02:56 PM |
#11 |
| -
How expectedly ad hominem of you to say so. n/t |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 03:00 PM |
#12 |
| -
You Need To Educate Yourself On The Definition Of Ad Hominem, Prior To Its Future Use. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 03:58 PM |
#15 |
| -
And another ad hominem. Thank you for yet another example |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 04:44 PM |
#17 |
| -
You Should've Taken My Advice. You Obviously Have No Idea How To Determine An Ad Hominem. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 05:06 PM |
#21 |
| -
You're being sarcastic, right? |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 05:10 PM |
#22 |
| -
Ok Bornablahblah, Point Out The Ad Hominems Prior Please. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 05:13 PM |
#23 |
| -
"That article is extremism to all sorts of irrational degrees." |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 05:14 PM |
#24 |
| -
That's Not An Ad Hominem. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 05:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
That's another one right there. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 05:19 PM |
#26 |
| -
I Think You Need To Read Your Own Link Pal. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 05:25 PM |
#28 |
| -
See also the "shoot the messenger" subdivision of ad hominem. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 05:27 PM |
#30 |
| -
What On Earth Are You Talking About? Not A Surprise You Can't Defend Your Position. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 06:01 PM |
#32 |
| -
And that whole post is another example of an ad hominem. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 06:05 PM |
#33 |
| -
ROFLMAO!!!! You Just Can't Do It! Keep Deflecting Away Pal, But You're Still Losing. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 06:21 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yes, yes. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 06:22 PM |
#35 |
| -
Dude, You're Done. You've Been Thoroughly Defeated... Again. |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jul-19-07 06:36 PM |
#36 |
| -
ad ignorantium. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 06:41 PM |
#37 |
| -
The definition of words does not depend on the gender of who wrote the definition. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jul-19-07 04:49 PM |
#19 |
| -
But, not all crimes require the victim prove that they did not contribute |
Cerridwen |
Jul-19-07 05:20 PM |
#27 |
| -
There is a difference. |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-20-07 08:45 AM |
#43 |
| -
Exactly -- if I am robbed, I am the victim - If I am murdered, I am the victim - |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-20-07 08:40 AM |
#40 |
| -
Not only do you have to prove you were the victim, |
Cerridwen |
Jul-20-07 09:27 AM |
#44 |
| -
Exactly. As one poster said over at IBTP, |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-21-07 08:41 AM |
#45 |
| -
If the default setting were yes, there wouldn't be any rape laws at all. |
JVS |
Jul-19-07 05:26 PM |
#29 |
| -
Historically, rape laws were to protect the interests of the family; |
Cerridwen |
Jul-20-07 08:39 AM |
#39 |
| -
The default right now is that a woman can only be raped in certain circumstances |
Katherine Brengle |
Jul-20-07 08:42 AM |
#41 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread