Reply #38: ***4:29

[ralps]

It's 4:29, and we're not quite done yet.

The defense makes its pitch for excluding the new batch of articles, and Walton seems receptive, saying they are "of little probative value and potentially prejudicial." Fitz says they show Libby's focus and the Wilson issue and that the govt. feels the "Wilson issue" and "Wilson's wife issue" are inextricably entertained — a little snark as he says, "just because someone charged with perjury says the two were separate, that doesn't mean we should be constrained" (or words to that effect). Walton says he'll think it over.

School's out! Catch ya later.

I'll see you all in the next Libby Liveblogging thread tomorrow, unless you all want to check out the nightly Malloy Truthseeker thread
:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :woohoo: