You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: The wording refers to people in the United States. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-18-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. The wording refers to people in the United States.
Specifically.
But yes, I think it is related to Iran in that
the shit is about to hit the fan in the US economically.

BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -New Executive order. I need it put into understandable terms. What does alfredo  Jul-18-07 02:09 PM   #0 
  - What the hell is this double speak?  acmavm   Jul-18-07 02:11 PM   #1 
  - does this allow for the confiscation of property of people who disagree with the regime?  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 02:12 PM   #2 
  - It's ALL about the oil law in Iraq..and those opposed to the takeover  angstlessk   Jul-18-07 02:15 PM   #3 
  - I've read the damn thing three times through. It's so open-ended, 6 degrees removed could be seized  sicksicksick_N_tired   Jul-18-07 06:01 PM   #85 
  - Appears to be an asset seizure order  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 02:17 PM   #4 
  - notice that the words "terrorism" and "terrorist"  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 02:18 PM   #5 
  - nor is 'act of violence' defined  endarkenment   Jul-18-07 02:25 PM   #9 
  - Right, but it does seem limited to ...  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 02:39 PM   #13 
  - Yes, true conservatives would loathe this - IF they actually HEARD about it.  Nothing Without Hope   Jul-18-07 05:48 PM   #81 
     - Someone Should Post This  Megahurtz   Jul-19-07 08:44 PM   #116 
  - I read that too as very ambiguous and alarming  IChing   Jul-18-07 02:19 PM   #6 
  - The Thief Who Would Be King - Send this to Lou Dobbs and Jack McCafferty!  Swamp Rat   Jul-18-07 02:21 PM   #7 
  - A Handmaid's Tale was the first thing that came to my mind.  MindPilot   Jul-18-07 02:25 PM   #8 
  - And section 8 says you can't sue them if they are wrong  MiniMe   Jul-18-07 02:27 PM   #10 
  - It seems to say...  TechBear_Seattle   Jul-18-07 02:32 PM   #11 
  - Transactions clause is probably designed...  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 02:41 PM   #14 
  - I have little faith that he wouldn't abuse this EO.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 03:07 PM   #19 
  - My take on this...  citizen_jane   Jul-18-07 02:37 PM   #12 
  - I wouldn't put it past King George to use this thing to freeze the assets of  kestrel91316   Jul-18-07 02:51 PM   #15 
  - Section 5 is very troubling  CabalPowered   Jul-18-07 02:51 PM   #16 
  - EO 13303 "I hereby declare a national emergency"  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 02:53 PM   #17 
  - Someone answer this, please. Would this be the national emergency  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 03:26 PM   #25 
  - Has he declared a national emergency? Could this be intimidation  alfredo   Jul-18-07 03:58 PM   #31 
  - Don't know - can't get an answer as to whether or not I've read  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 04:18 PM   #43 
     - I guess we should consult a lawyer or two.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:00 PM   #57 
     - I keep hoping one of our DU legal eagles will chime in. :D  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:06 PM   #61 
        - We have to wait for some to get off of work, decompress, and log on.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:08 PM   #64 
        - :D And keep kicking this so they see it and respond.  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:09 PM   # 
           - Please do. It already has over 5 recs, so it is on the front page.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:14 PM   #69 
              - Thanks, for the reminder. I added my recommend to my  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:19 PM   #73 
                 - Thanks  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:44 PM   #79 
        - I don't think this is quite as unusual as most think  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 05:13 PM   #68 
           - I realize, but this is the first time we've had a "Patriot Act" in addition  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:18 PM   #71 
              - Yes, I agree  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 05:19 PM   #72 
                 - Have you read the 4 EOs which work in concert with this one?  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:27 PM   #76 
     - he could reasonably state that the emergency started today when Reid tabled the  truedelphi   Jul-18-07 09:00 PM   #97 
     - Yeah, it seems others here are thinking the same.  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 12:56 PM   #102 
     - Can you post the expansion, I can't open the link.  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:35 PM   #110 
        - Aw, of course. Gimme a minute or two and I'll see if I can find text  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 08:45 PM   #117 
        - Cool.  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:50 PM   #119 
        - Try this link - straight to whitehouse.gov - I'd copy & paste but it's long  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 08:51 PM   #120 
  - Under the PATRIOT Act, a declaration of "national emergency" can suspend elections.  TomInTib   Jul-18-07 04:55 PM   #53 
     - So, there's a very real possibility that the EO from May '03  Cerridwen   Jul-18-07 05:00 PM   #56 
     - hmmmmf. May as well declare another fucking war rat heya.  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:37 PM   #111 
  - If I'm reading that right,  ThomCat   Jul-18-07 03:00 PM   #18 
  - Hi Thomcat! nt  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 03:13 PM   #22 
  - Hi, HamdenRice!  ThomCat   Jul-18-07 03:15 PM   #23 
     - Yeah! Let's eat our way down Queens blvd!  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 03:23 PM   #24 
  - That's exactly how it can be interpretted and enforced. You can also read it as:  file83   Jul-18-07 08:06 PM   #94 
  - I was just holding an Impeach sign at a protest. Can they seize my assets now?  L. Coyote   Jul-18-07 08:57 PM   #96 
  - Looks like everything is set up now  Canuckistanian   Jul-18-07 03:12 PM   #20 
  - We can't just look at one action, we have to see them as a whole.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 03:52 PM   #30 
     - Exactly  Canuckistanian   Jul-18-07 06:31 PM   #91 
        - We have to stand up now and peacefully & legally remove those  alfredo   Jul-19-07 02:51 PM   #107 
           - But WHO's Gonna Do It???  Megahurtz   Jul-19-07 08:53 PM   #121 
              - It will have to come from the bottom. We are the ones who hold up the  alfredo   Jul-19-07 09:28 PM   #124 
  - It's a very sad commentary on Congressional vs presidential power  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 03:12 PM   #21 
  - K&R. This is the first thing I've read on DU for two weeks.  intheflow   Jul-18-07 03:42 PM   #26 
  - july 17 2007  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 03:44 PM   #27 
     - Thanks. n/t  intheflow   Jul-18-07 03:49 PM   #28 
  - As I read this, the focus seems to be on VIOLENT acts. But free speech isn't violence.  redacted   Jul-18-07 03:52 PM   #29 
  - "risk" is an operative word in this  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 04:00 PM   #32 
  - Demonstrations against the war? Can that carry a "risk of violence"?  alfredo   Jul-18-07 04:03 PM   #34 
     - this administration is capable of any kind of malfeasance  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 04:07 PM   #36 
        - haven't they already done that with animal rights groups?  alfredo   Jul-18-07 04:08 PM   #37 
           - not exactly sure about that  datasuspect   Jul-18-07 04:09 PM   #38 
           - Yes. The DoJ has decided that environmentalists and animal rights  ThomCat   Jul-18-07 04:30 PM   #46 
              - I wasn't sure if it was national or just Texas.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:05 PM   #60 
  - Violent doesn't need to be physical. It could mean fierce opposition.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 04:01 PM   #33 
  - "pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence"  HamdenRice   Jul-18-07 04:06 PM   #35 
     - Couldn't it also be applied to congressmen who are trying to stop  alfredo   Jul-18-07 04:10 PM   #40 
        - Or candidates? Ron Paul? Or GOP senators against the war?  redacted   Jul-18-07 04:41 PM   #49 
           - This could be benign, but all we have to go on is how bush has acted  alfredo   Jul-18-07 05:07 PM   #62 
  - Is he threatening Congress????????? eom  OmmmSweetOmmm   Jul-18-07 04:10 PM   #39 
  - That was just what I was thinking.  alfredo   Jul-18-07 04:12 PM   #41 
  - That was my first thought, too. My second thought was...  Frustratedlady   Jul-18-07 05:31 PM   #77 
     - Let's see how aggressive congress will get at restoring our  alfredo   Jul-19-07 02:47 PM   #106 
  - Seems to me like redeployment would be categorized as "undermining  Marr   Jul-18-07 04:28 PM   #45 
  - Good lord... talk about a bloodless coup, electronic is more like it.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 04:16 PM   #42 
  - Under the PATRIOT Act, a declaration of "national emergency" can suspend elections.  TomInTib   Jul-18-07 04:57 PM   #55 
     - Suspend election, freeze assets, prevent traveling outside of the US. You name it-  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:01 PM   #58 
        - We don't even know the half of it.  TomInTib   Jul-18-07 05:39 PM   #78 
           - That's the trouble, it has all been done with stealth and no attention paid to it.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:46 PM   #80 
              - Congress is powerless now.  TomInTib   Jul-18-07 06:01 PM   #86 
                 - Well, that's the part I have trouble with, AS IF they didn't KNOW about these EOs???  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 06:06 PM   #87 
                    - Because they are ALL bought and sold.  TomInTib   Jul-18-07 06:14 PM   #88 
                       - Okay, I'll check back with you later- I'm running to the market myself.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 06:19 PM   #89 
  - I have been worrying that he is planning something during Congressional recess  Nothing Without Hope   Jul-18-07 04:25 PM   #44 
  - "disarming any opposition" and preventing people from leaving with their money  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 04:37 PM   #48 
  - I'm far from the only one fearing a move to totalitarianism this summer:  Nothing Without Hope   Jul-18-07 05:11 PM   #67 
     - When you connect the dots between all these EO's, it does not look good at all.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:16 PM   #70 
        - I agree, but you will never hear about it in the corporate media or even from  Nothing Without Hope   Jul-18-07 05:20 PM   #74 
           - Me too.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:25 PM   #75 
  - Iran?  KelleyKramer   Jul-18-07 04:35 PM   #47 
  - Could be another way to provoke them  OzarkDem   Jul-18-07 04:44 PM   #50 
  - Can the Congressional leadership require that Congress stay in session?  redacted   Jul-18-07 04:45 PM   #51 
     - Call an ER session.  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:41 PM   #112 
  - The wording refers to people in the United States.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 04:51 PM   #52 
     - Exact wording-  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 04:55 PM   #54 
  - Question isn't this covered under "Unlawful searches and seizures"  intaglio   Jul-18-07 05:03 PM   #59 
  - Well, basically he just decided what unlawful is.  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:08 PM   #63 
     - hmmmmf ready now to  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:42 PM   #113 
  - Trading with the enemy act? T'was in damn books  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-18-07 05:09 PM   #65 
  - Iran have assets in America?  wildbilln864   Jul-18-07 05:10 PM   #66 
  - "They get to say who is guilty."  Disturbed   Jul-18-07 05:49 PM   #82 
  - yep, n/t  wildbilln864   Jul-18-07 05:50 PM   #83 
  - To believe otherwise is to buy a ticket to ride "The Ship of Fools"  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 05:56 PM   #84 
  - We've had a trade embargo against them for a couple decades. I doubt  alfredo   Jul-19-07 11:35 PM   #125 
  - Is it time to impeach yet? n/t  malaise   Jul-18-07 06:23 PM   #90 
  - Oh no, that would distract us from the really important issues  jgraz   Jul-18-07 07:06 PM   #92 
     - Precisely- why are they talking about wages and ignoring the fact that your account can be frozen?  BeHereNow   Jul-18-07 07:32 PM   #93 
  - Does this mean he can freeze Harry Reids assets?!  BrainGlutton   Jul-18-07 08:48 PM   #95 
  - Just listened to Mike Malloy and Thom Hartman today!  IChing   Jul-18-07 11:58 PM   #98 
  - If you want to hear the show with Hartman here is the mp3 link  IChing   Jul-19-07 12:02 AM   #99 
  - Thanks, IChing. For your post and for the info about Malloy.  Cerridwen   Jul-19-07 12:55 PM   #101 
  - A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq  ClayZ   Jul-19-07 12:35 PM   #100 
  - And what government of Iraq?  lonestarnot   Jul-19-07 08:43 PM   #115 
  - This part is pretty scary:  Contrary1   Jul-19-07 01:13 PM   #103 
  - damnatio memoriae Just like the Roman Empire did.  alfredo   Jul-19-07 08:09 PM   #108 
  - Thom Hartmann discussed this EO with Bruce Fein today  Emit   Jul-19-07 01:33 PM   #104 
  - This is some seriously evil stuff  Zodiak Ironfist   Jul-19-07 02:07 PM   #105 
  - It has certainly been discussed, the passport issue.  BeHereNow   Jul-19-07 08:19 PM   #109 
  - I'm not allowed to immigrate. It wasn't from an illegal act, it was  alfredo   Jul-19-07 08:48 PM   #118 
  - Sure Looks That Way Now  Megahurtz   Jul-19-07 09:04 PM   #122 
  - the little SOB better be careful...  Babsbrain   Jul-19-07 08:43 PM   #114 
  - If I didn't know better, this might be some kind of prelude to fascism...  JacquesMolay   Jul-19-07 09:10 PM   #123 
  - Or pushy congressmen/women  alfredo   Jul-20-07 10:31 AM   #126 
  - I sent this letter to my congressman  alfredo   Jul-20-07 12:18 PM   #127 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC