|
Sometimes, a reader must have the mental capacity to figure concepts out for themselves. Since that concept seems to have failed here, I'll explain further.
When I said 'allow', it wasn't meant in the way of its core technical meaning to infer that I actually thought the poster was attempting to outright ban such behavior. That much should've seemed obvious based on the context in which it was said. Instead, common sense would dictate that in the terms it was spoken, there was an 'understood' inherent afterwards, as in : "We're not allowed to have deep personal faith now (without having to be subjected to melodramatic ignorant outrage)?".
See, the latter part was to be understood by the reader, since the premise would've been obvious and of common sense. I'm a bit amazed you perceived it as having meant something different. But what can ya do. :shrug:
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
