You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: I read the text and nowhere does it say that an attack is allowed on Iran [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. I read the text and nowhere does it say that an attack is allowed on Iran
there is lots of shameless untruths and propaganda, Iran is accused of being a state sponsor of terrorism, but nowhere does it give a green light for an attack on anybody.

It is an excuse to slander Iran every two months that is all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -97-0 Vote for Lieberman Amendment! 97 Senators want War with Iran??? (including Feingold?) KoKo01  Jul-16-07 09:46 AM   #0 
  - Is this the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution for the Iranian War? n/t  shain from kane   Jul-16-07 09:48 AM   #1 
  - It's not a vote for war with Iran  bryant69   Jul-16-07 09:48 AM   #2 
  - If you go to the link and read the whole article you will see it's NOT what you say...  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 09:51 AM   #4 
  - OK let's read the article  bryant69   Jul-16-07 10:00 AM   #10 
  - Do you remember the Iraq War Resolution? And the Senators who claimed it didn't give Bush authority  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 10:04 AM   #14 
     - That bit didn't make a lot of sense to me  bryant69   Jul-16-07 10:10 AM   #18 
     - Well...your conclusion is the worry....  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 10:25 AM   #23 
     - Congress's perception of the President is different than our own  bryant69   Jul-16-07 10:30 AM   #25 
        - It's surprising that Senators like Boxer, Feingold, Kennedy, Levin  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 10:34 AM   #27 
           - I disagree with that assertion  bryant69   Jul-16-07 10:39 AM   #28 
     - What if the Administration just jumps into a war with Iran and uses  Rex   Jul-16-07 12:59 PM   #41 
        - I suppose they could  bryant69   Jul-16-07 01:19 PM   #42 
           - True, they could, but innocuous bills like this one give them a wooden  Rex   Jul-16-07 01:24 PM   #43 
     - You nailed it right there.  Dr.Phool   Jul-16-07 10:11 AM   #19 
  - I agree with you and ....  snappyturtle   Jul-16-07 10:15 AM   #21 
  - and whose intelligence will they rely on to determine that connection? oh riiiight  Lerkfish   Jul-16-07 09:55 AM   #8 
  - even better THEY FUCKING OUTSOURCED INTEL!  mod mom   Jul-16-07 03:52 PM   #67 
  - Now Let's Tag An Ammedment To It...  KharmaTrain   Jul-16-07 10:02 AM   #12 
  - That's not a bad idea  bryant69   Jul-16-07 10:04 AM   #13 
  - Kharma...where do we get the votes for an Amendment to the Amendment that won Overwhelmingly.  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 04:47 PM   #72 
  - Right! ..and the IWR was not a vote for WAR with Iraq....  bvar22   Jul-16-07 02:13 PM   #53 
  - Well the Iraq War Resolution was called the Iraq War Resolution  bryant69   Jul-16-07 02:59 PM   #57 
  - hahahaha  Jacobin   Jul-16-07 07:39 PM   #78 
  - 97 Senators are either terrified of AIPAC or in their back pocket.  NoodleyAppendage   Jul-16-07 09:50 AM   #3 
  - The AIPAC "boogeyman."  Behind the Aegis   Jul-16-07 12:09 PM   #35 
     - The AIPAC "ostrich with head in sand" defenders.  NoodleyAppendage   Jul-16-07 01:24 PM   #44 
     - What a poorly crafted response.  Behind the Aegis   Jul-16-07 01:29 PM   #47 
        - Not worth arguing with you. n/t  NoodleyAppendage   Jul-16-07 01:32 PM   #48 
           - There was no arguing, as you have no point.  Behind the Aegis   Jul-16-07 01:36 PM   #49 
     - It may be a boogeyman,  NCevilDUer   Jul-16-07 01:56 PM   #50 
        - Interesting.  Behind the Aegis   Jul-16-07 02:04 PM   #52 
           - What about the power of the anti-semitism threat?  NoodleyAppendage   Jul-16-07 02:43 PM   #54 
              - More nonsense.  Behind the Aegis   Jul-16-07 02:47 PM   #55 
              - Considering that most Jewish Americans DO NOT want a war with Iran...  LeftishBrit   Jul-16-07 02:57 PM   #56 
                 - Maybe those Jewish Americans should reign in the lobby?  NoodleyAppendage   Jul-16-07 03:25 PM   #60 
                    - A majority of Jewish Americans did vote against Bush...  LeftishBrit   Jul-16-07 06:01 PM   #75 
  - i havent researched it but i have to think if feingold voted for it that  bullimiami   Jul-16-07 09:52 AM   #5 
  - a little more from the article explains some of this....here's a snip:  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 09:56 AM   #9 
     - Feingold is stuck on this one  wtmusic   Jul-16-07 10:05 AM   #15 
        - I agree  knowledgeispwr   Jul-16-07 12:29 PM   #38 
        - And when there is a terrorist attack which is "conclusively proved"  NCevilDUer   Jul-16-07 02:04 PM   #51 
  - They probably don't want the right-wing press to be able to paint them as 'unpatriotic'  LeftishBrit   Jul-16-07 09:53 AM   #6 
  - If I were Harry Reid  SoFlaJet   Jul-16-07 09:55 AM   #7 
  - By this "logic"?? shouldn't we be looking at Saudi Arabia's involvment  dkofos   Jul-16-07 10:02 AM   #11 
  - Good Point and Josh Marshall mentions this in his link to the article I posted this a.m.  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 10:07 AM   #16 
  - The article may be mistaken in its conclusions  TheBaldyMan   Jul-16-07 10:07 AM   #17 
  - Scanning your PDF link to the language of the Amendment shows that this  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 10:30 AM   #26 
     - I read the text and nowhere does it say that an attack is allowed on Iran  TheBaldyMan   Jul-16-07 10:45 AM   #29 
        - I think you've got it!  LeftishBrit   Jul-16-07 10:56 AM   #30 
           - But you know how Bush/Cheney let things sort of "get out of hand."  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 03:44 PM   #63 
  - Feingold has always said that MILITARY ACTION aginst Iran IS NOT OFF THE TABLE.  xultar   Jul-16-07 10:13 AM   #20 
  - The Iran War Train is gathering steam..  citizen_jane   Jul-16-07 10:17 AM   #22 
  - A genuinely helpful thread! K&R  FredStembottom   Jul-16-07 10:26 AM   #24 
  - Why did the Bush Junta need a Senate resolution to investigate a matter  Peace Patriot   Jul-16-07 11:04 AM   #31 
  - deja vu all over again ...  Everybody   Jul-16-07 11:54 AM   #32 
  - Aren't you glad we have 2 parties that are totally different and represent a myriad of views?  Beelzebud   Jul-16-07 11:55 AM   #33 
  - from Senate.gov  LSK   Jul-16-07 12:01 PM   #34 
  - OOH I bet he's feeling all puffed up and important.. n/t  SoCalDem   Jul-16-07 12:09 PM   #36 
  - So whose taking bets as to when the war with Iran starts? nt  Javaman   Jul-16-07 12:27 PM   #37 
  - Different interpretation  knowledgeispwr   Jul-16-07 12:32 PM   #39 
  - The frame is confrontational and not conducive to diplomacy. n/t  sfexpat2000   Jul-16-07 01:25 PM   #45 
     - Perhaps...  knowledgeispwr   Jul-16-07 03:38 PM   #61 
     - The resolution is confrontational and undermines any diplomatic  sfexpat2000   Jul-16-07 03:51 PM   #66 
     - excellent point.  tomp   Jul-16-07 11:15 PM   #83 
  - this will look great in 08 if we try to run as anti-war in Iran  librechik   Jul-16-07 12:50 PM   #40 
  - Koko01, will you help me sponsor a call in day about this vote?  sfexpat2000   Jul-16-07 01:27 PM   #46 
  - I just got back to this thread....I'll PM you.  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 03:45 PM   #64 
     - Okay.  sfexpat2000   Jul-16-07 03:49 PM   #65 
  - What About Saudi Fucking Arabia????!!!!  Bushwick Bill   Jul-16-07 03:01 PM   #58 
  - Seems it's meant to be kept quiet as if LAT's isn't good enough.......  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 08:04 PM   #82 
  - When they investigate, they will find Kucinich under Ahmedinijad's desk.  churchofreality   Jul-16-07 03:02 PM   #59 
  - pass the popcorn n/t  conspirator   Jul-16-07 03:38 PM   #62 
  - I thought the Liebermen amendment was to require the administration to issue a report to the Senate  in_cog_ni_to   Jul-16-07 03:53 PM   #68 
  - "Baldy Man" post on this thread #17 Gives link to the PDF of Amendment Language...  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 04:21 PM   #69 
  - what about being fooled twice don't you get...  loveandlight   Jul-16-07 04:25 PM   #70 
     - No. I don't believe the Senate agreed that Iran has been doing harm to the troops, but the amendment  in_cog_ni_to   Jul-16-07 04:47 PM   #71 
        - When you get a chance...it's important to read...  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 04:52 PM   #73 
           - Here's the Amendment. a non-PDF. That asshole Lieberman must have a running file on Iran because  in_cog_ni_to   Jul-16-07 05:47 PM   #74 
              - Thanks for putting it out there in Real Write...not like PDF so EVERYONE can SEE THIS!  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 07:34 PM   #76 
              - It's very bad and it's quite OBVIOUS where Lieberman wants to go with that.  in_cog_ni_to   Jul-16-07 07:43 PM   #80 
              - Did you see the "sense of congress" section near the end (b1 and b2)? That's the part  wiggs   Jul-16-07 07:40 PM   #79 
                 - LAT's says it's Saudi Insurgents Murdering American Troops, though...  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 07:43 PM   #81 
                 - "sense of congress" sounds like "the gut feeling of Chertoff" n/t  CGowen   Jul-17-07 09:16 AM   #87 
  - Seems what's said on this Thread isn't ALONE...DU'er "kpete" just posted THIS!  KoKo01   Jul-16-07 07:37 PM   #77 
  - Yes, Feingold wants war with Iran  Freddie Stubbs   Jul-16-07 11:59 PM   #84 
  - they are all whores  Skittles   Jul-17-07 12:44 AM   #85 
  - All The NSA Intercepts Went Straight to AIPAC  AndyTiedye   Jul-17-07 02:37 AM   #86 
  - Questions make baby Jesus cry  mdmc   Jul-17-07 09:57 AM   #88 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC