helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-12-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
| 7. What the hell are you talking about? They found her in contempt! |
| -so good old harriet, "he's really cool", miers got to skate, huh? |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 10:50 AM |
#0 |
 -
Throw her in jail |
HughMoran |
Jul-12-07 10:52 AM |
#1 |
| -
Uh...no. She's in contempt. They have five days to decide what to do next. |
Atman |
Jul-12-07 10:52 AM |
#2 |
  -
This reminded me of the scene from the life of brian where the |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 10:57 AM |
#10 |
| -
Did I miss something? My computer crashed just before the end of the hearing but I thought |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Jul-12-07 10:53 AM |
#3 |
| -
No she didn't, she will be facing "Contempt of Congress" charges! eom ww |
BlackHawk706867 |
Jul-12-07 10:53 AM |
#4 |
| -
I thought that today's hearing |
Drum |
Jul-12-07 10:53 AM |
#5 |
| -
I'll just say this and not post to these threads anymore today... |
Kagemusha |
Jul-12-07 10:53 AM |
#6 |
| -
You could post to them without sarcasm and educate us if you know. |
Bluebear |
Jul-12-07 10:56 AM |
#9 |
| -
I just responded to that. Sigh. |
Kagemusha |
Jul-12-07 11:00 AM |
#12 |
| -
Who called you a know-nothing moron? |
Bluebear |
Jul-12-07 11:02 AM |
#13 |
| -
so in essance what you are saying is that they held a vote to have a future vote??? |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 11:02 AM |
#14 |
| -
... Fine, one last post. |
Kagemusha |
Jul-12-07 11:08 AM |
#16 |
| -
Thanks for the clarification, but why didn't they just use |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 11:27 AM |
#18 |
| -
Well, the House has a rule requiring at least 72 hours' notice. |
Kagemusha |
Jul-12-07 06:02 PM |
#26 |
| -
What the hell are you talking about? They found her in contempt! |
helderheid |
Jul-12-07 10:54 AM |
#7 |
| -
from what I'm reading it's a yes and no thing... |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 11:29 AM |
#19 |
| -
In a dictatorship, yes |
Zensea |
Jul-12-07 11:41 AM |
#20 |
| -
Actually, when inherent contempt is invoked they can go an arrest her. |
Javaman |
Jul-12-07 11:55 AM |
#22 |
| -
Post 12 and 8 |
Zensea |
Jul-12-07 11:58 AM |
#24 |
| -
I think they are following the rules - something the Republicans can't seem to do. |
helderheid |
Jul-12-07 11:54 AM |
#21 |
| -
This is what Christy Smith has to say about it at Firedoglake |
shraby |
Jul-12-07 10:55 AM |
#8 |
| -
Thank you - that deserves its own thread. Everything happened so fast and I had to step away from |
helderheid |
Jul-12-07 10:58 AM |
#11 |
| -
I thought it was odd Cannon didn't demand a roll call vote |
karlrschneider |
Jul-12-07 11:04 AM |
#15 |
| -
This is the rule from the 109th.. cant find the 110th |
Moochy |
Jul-12-07 11:59 AM |
#25 |
| -
Um...in a word,no. |
Forkboy |
Jul-12-07 11:22 AM |
#17 |
| -
Dear Committee, |
SoCalDem |
Jul-12-07 11:56 AM |
#23 |
| -
The House could have her arrested if they file Inherent |
Disturbed |
Jul-12-07 06:11 PM |
#28 |
| -
Wow. You must WANT to look dumb in posting an OP like that. |
brentspeak |
Jul-12-07 06:07 PM |
#27 |
| -
The OP was correct. The plain Contempt Charge will |
Disturbed |
Jul-12-07 06:20 PM |
#29 |
| -
gees ... and YOU must NOT want to look like a nice person. |
halobeam |
Jul-12-07 06:25 PM |
#30 |
| -
Things don't happen as fast as we can *talk* - that's just the way it goes. |
BlooInBloo |
Jul-12-07 06:26 PM |
#31 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread