L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-10-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #52 |
| 56. There is a HUGE difference between loyal and co-conspirator! |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-10-07 12:43 PM by L. Coyote
Guess which one won't talk and which one will.
|
| -WAR ROOM Tim Grieve: Sara Taylor will appear at Judiciary hearing despite Executive Privilege |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 09:27 PM |
#0 |
 -
now THAT's interesting |
frogcycle |
Jul-09-07 09:30 PM |
#1 |
 -
we can hope |
tibbiit |
Jul-09-07 09:35 PM |
#5 |
 -
I'm tired of hoping. |
mwb970 |
Jul-10-07 06:49 AM |
#37 |
| -
I doubt it |
DU9598 |
Jul-09-07 10:13 PM |
#12 |
| -
Under oath?... |
Kikosexy2 |
Jul-10-07 10:29 AM |
#42 |
| -
John Dean thinks that the white house will issue a gag order |
IChing |
Jul-09-07 09:30 PM |
#2 |
| -
Did he explain what he meant by that? |
pnwmom |
Jul-09-07 09:33 PM |
#3 |
| -
He used the term restraining order. Watching it now. n/y |
Kingshakabobo |
Jul-09-07 09:51 PM |
#10 |
| -
I wonder if he means the Norfolk Naval Prison. n/t |
CK_John |
Jul-10-07 12:11 AM |
#20 |
| -
Like that would be a problem. n/t |
CK_John |
Jul-10-07 12:06 AM |
#19 |
| -
I'd like to see what a legal basis might be. Unlikely, not? |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 09:34 PM |
#4 |
| -
Well bush is known for his firsts |
proud patriot |
Jul-09-07 09:37 PM |
#6 |
| -
they don't need a gag order |
frogcycle |
Jul-09-07 09:39 PM |
#7 |
| -
Hah! n/t |
pnwmom |
Jul-09-07 10:41 PM |
#13 |
| -
LOL...it still was interesting and I smell something on the table |
IChing |
Jul-09-07 10:44 PM |
#15 |
| -
let her talk or you're coming out of the WH in handcuffs, BushCo |
wordpix |
Jul-10-07 12:00 PM |
#50 |
| -
So she talks anyway and congress gives her immunity to bring this beast down |
shadowknows69 |
Jul-10-07 01:40 AM |
#32 |
| -
Does Sara need protection from these thugs, that should be |
alyce douglas |
Jul-10-07 10:08 AM |
#40 |
| -
She has attorneys now. Who are they?? Also, Monica and Susan lawyers |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 10:57 AM |
#43 |
| -
Sara Taylor's RNC E-mail Subpoened by HOUSE committees. |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 09:42 PM |
#8 |
| -
I forgot about that! So the RNC Chair is also facing contempt charges |
pnwmom |
Jul-09-07 10:45 PM |
#16 |
| -
There is a lot of stonewalling and a lot of information due. It has only begun. |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 11:51 PM |
#17 |
| -
hmmm... |
frogcycle |
Jul-10-07 06:37 AM |
#34 |
| -
LEAHY letter to Fred Fielding, Counsel to the President. Says it all! |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 09:48 PM |
#9 |
| -
I heard something about this today on tv......... |
jaxx |
Jul-09-07 09:58 PM |
#11 |
| -
I think she plans to testify. Maybe plead the fifth or claim privilege, maybe not. |
L. Coyote |
Jul-09-07 10:42 PM |
#14 |
| -
IMHO Under advice of counsel, she will invoke her 5th Amendment Privilege... |
Blackhatjack |
Jul-09-07 11:59 PM |
#18 |
| -
Something changed. She did not reply before, now she is no longer in the White House. |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 12:14 AM |
#21 |
| -
I wonder why she quit her job, when if she had stayed, she probably |
pnwmom |
Jul-10-07 12:28 AM |
#23 |
| -
She quit when implicated in the dimissal of Cummins, but, we need to know why |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 12:48 AM |
#24 |
| -
Thanks for all the info. |
pnwmom |
Jul-10-07 01:27 AM |
#28 |
| -
They know that Abramoff and others are singing and singing and singing |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 01:39 AM |
#31 |
| -
Yes. And she's young enough to realize that she's about to be on the |
The Backlash Cometh |
Jul-10-07 06:30 AM |
#33 |
| -
At which point they'll probably immunize her -- and then what? |
pnwmom |
Jul-10-07 12:26 AM |
#22 |
| -
Yes, and we can ask about her assistant, former Aramoff's aid Susan Ralston |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 12:53 AM |
#25 |
| -
as soon as she does that |
frogcycle |
Jul-10-07 06:43 AM |
#35 |
| -
John Dean said the psycho-in-chief would have to get a restraining order to stop her if she WANTED |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jul-10-07 01:00 AM |
#26 |
| -
is not John Dean's presence covering this just eerie? |
frogcycle |
Jul-10-07 06:47 AM |
#36 |
| -
John Dean will go down as a true patriot of this period, along with KO |
wordpix |
Jul-10-07 12:02 PM |
#51 |
| -
I remember that day too. It is quite eerie having him cover this. I'm hoping beyond all hope |
in_cog_ni_to |
Jul-10-07 01:51 PM |
#58 |
| -
yes, I think this regime is counting on that to bring it to the Supreme |
alyce douglas |
Jul-10-07 10:15 AM |
#41 |
| -
They'll gag-order her like Sibel Edwards or she'll take the 5th all the way thru...! |
Imagevision |
Jul-10-07 01:09 AM |
#27 |
| -
I think it will be much harder to get a gag order or restraining order, |
pnwmom |
Jul-10-07 01:29 AM |
#29 |
| -
Or, this could be Bombshell Week in DC, filled with whores and liars, cheats and thieves |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 01:37 AM |
#30 |
| -
correction: "whores and liars, cheats and thieves" ON PARADE. . .n/t |
annabanana |
Jul-10-07 06:57 AM |
#38 |
| -
Add "IN HANDCUFFS" because we don't do guillotines any more. |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 10:04 AM |
#39 |
| -
Sara Taylor's lawyer says she's a pawn |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 11:34 AM |
#44 |
| -
On KO last night, John Dean said she can still testify |
Norquist Nemesis |
Jul-10-07 12:07 PM |
#53 |
| -
Bush will find out if she is going to testify when we do. Too late to stop her! |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 12:40 PM |
#55 |
| -
Pretty sure that her lawyer would let Bushetals and Senate staffers know |
Norquist Nemesis |
Jul-10-07 12:49 PM |
#57 |
| -
July 7 RAW STORY: White House plans to block testimony from former top Rove aide |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 11:37 AM |
#45 |
| -
Under oath? |
helderheid |
Jul-10-07 11:37 AM |
#46 |
| -
Leahy: White House "Contemptuous Of The Congress" |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 11:39 AM |
#47 |
| -
Harriet Miers has officially informed the House Judiciary Committee |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 11:55 AM |
#48 |
| -
Miers has "has no choice" but comply with pRes' counsel? |
wordpix |
Jul-10-07 12:06 PM |
#52 |
| -
There is a HUGE difference between loyal and co-conspirator! |
L. Coyote |
Jul-10-07 12:42 PM |
#56 |
| -
Oh, yeah! Way to go, Judiciary, but is that under oath? |
wordpix |
Jul-10-07 11:59 AM |
#49 |
| -
It doesn't reallly have to be |
underpants |
Jul-10-07 12:08 PM |
#54 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread