You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #15: My mistake, that was intended for another post [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-29-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. My mistake, that was intended for another post
Someone else was saying they heard a rumor that Tavis was going to Fox.

Tavis has issues about this Presidential election, the partisanship and the loyalty factor.

Tavis really doesn't care about either party. I think that's what's been coming through lately. He's tired of the Dems just like he's tired of the Repubs. I don't blame him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Tavis Smiley is on the Washington Journal right now. . annabanana  Jun-29-07 07:57 AM   #0 
  - watch last night's debate online  soothsayer   Jun-29-07 08:00 AM   #1 
  - Or watch it on CSPAN this afternoon, if you have that channel.  MADem   Jun-29-07 08:10 AM   #3 
  - I stopped watching a short while ago, and no, no one did.  MADem   Jun-29-07 08:09 AM   #2 
     - Regardless, Tavis did an excellent job last night.  madame defarge   Jun-29-07 08:25 AM   #4 
     - The debate was very well done. I do think Tavis has a little something something going on, though  MADem   Jun-29-07 09:00 AM   #6 
        - Luntz is trying hard to appear not to be partisan.  blondeatlast   Jun-29-07 09:26 AM   #10 
        - Well, I emailed PBS as well. And they lied to me. So I emailed them again.  MADem   Jun-29-07 09:36 AM   #12 
           - what did I TELL you? heh  Gabi Hayes   Jun-29-07 10:02 AM   #19 
              - They aren't getting away with it, though. See, we're STILL talking about it.  MADem   Jun-29-07 10:06 AM   #23 
        - Luntz involvement negates good debate  OzarkDem   Jun-29-07 09:50 AM   #16 
           - Luntz will be on Tavis's show tonight. They dumped him from the post-debate analysis that they  MADem   Jun-29-07 10:02 AM   #20 
     - Tavis is polished but he's not a corporate whore  ellacott   Jun-29-07 08:29 AM   #5 
        - What can one make of his chummy relationship with Frank Luntz? nt  MADem   Jun-29-07 09:00 AM   #7 
           - So from that you deduced that he's going to Fox  ellacott   Jun-29-07 09:08 AM   #8 
              - read the interview transcript with Luntz. see how he defends Walmart  Gabi Hayes   Jun-29-07 09:17 AM   #9 
              - Is this the only introduction you have to Tavis Smiley?  ellacott   Jun-29-07 09:36 AM   #11 
                 - Well, I've been watching Tavis for years, and he's CHANGED. IMO.  MADem   Jun-29-07 09:42 AM   #14 
                    - Oh he's definately changed  ellacott   Jun-29-07 10:00 AM   #17 
                       - That was around the time that NPR started getting "too GOP" IIRC...! nt  MADem   Jun-29-07 10:03 AM   #21 
                          - I agree n/t  ellacott   Jun-29-07 10:06 AM   #24 
              - Huh? Who said anything about Fox? Not me.  MADem   Jun-29-07 09:39 AM   #13 
                 - My mistake, that was intended for another post  ellacott   Jun-29-07 09:45 AM   #15 
                    - Professor Kim Pearson, who blogged the debate, found the Luntz choice "odd" as well  MADem   Jun-29-07 10:01 AM   #18 
                       - It would be good if we could merge threads  ellacott   Jun-29-07 10:05 AM   #22 
                       - Juan Williams. I could just see if Tavis joined Fox--Newt or some other  MADem   Jun-29-07 10:13 AM   #26 
                          - Oh, him  ellacott   Jun-29-07 11:03 AM   #27 
                             - I don't think anyone expects Tavis to do a lockstep, really. I just think they expect him to  MADem   Jun-29-07 11:33 AM   #28 
                                - All that is understood  ellacott   Jun-29-07 12:03 PM   #29 
                                   - I certainly hope I'm wrong, I really do.  MADem   Jun-29-07 12:31 PM   #30 
                                      - What ironic is that most of people at the other message board...  ellacott   Jun-29-07 01:01 PM   #32 
                                         - Link, please? I'd like to see the discussion. I can't bring myself to  Gabi Hayes   Jun-29-07 01:31 PM   #34 
                                         - Well, this board is pretty huge. You've missed a bunch of threads that are discussing the debate  MADem   Jun-29-07 02:02 PM   #35 
                       - excellent post, and the last sentence crystallizes EVERYTHING that is  Gabi Hayes   Jun-29-07 10:08 AM   #25 
                          - Well, I can't take credit for it--it's from Professor Kim Pearson's blog.  MADem   Jun-29-07 12:40 PM   #31 
                             - shall I say excellent "get," then? I had some pretty good profs, back in the day,  Gabi Hayes   Jun-29-07 01:29 PM   #33 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC