You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #7: They could've not passed anything. They could've sent up the same bill over & over... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-18-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. They could've not passed anything. They could've sent up the same bill over & over...
... They had options, and chose the worst of all of them. They are blameworthy for that.

I don't go nearly so far as everyone else around here seems to on the I-hate-Democrats tip, but they definitely deserve the low approval ratings they've been getting lately.

And also for not backing up their subpoenas with Inherent Contempt action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Democrats Didn't Have the Votes to End the War liberalpragmatist  Jun-18-07 08:06 PM   #0 
  - They DID, however, have the power to delay funding...  derby378   Jun-18-07 08:08 PM   #1 
  - Again, they didn't have to vote to end the war all they had to do was let Bush's veto  dflprincess   Jun-18-07 08:08 PM   #2 
  - They didn't have to deliver a bill at all!  BobRossi   Jun-18-07 08:09 PM   #3 
  - "No money, no war"? Under rule by signing statement?  pat_k   Jun-19-07 03:13 AM   #34 
  - Bullshit. It only takes 41 votes in the Senate to stop funding the OCCUPATION.  TahitiNut   Jun-18-07 08:11 PM   #4 
  - Can you explain that?  WilliamPitt   Jun-18-07 08:39 PM   #17 
     - It takes 60 votes for cloture. 41 votes blocks cloture. Filibuster funding w/o exit.  TahitiNut   Jun-18-07 08:48 PM   #20 
        - Judging by the Sounding Of The Crickets, Apparently Not  TheWatcher   Jun-19-07 03:06 AM   #32 
        - Thank you for explaining that.  Le Taz Hot   Jun-19-07 04:33 AM   #35 
           - You're certainly welcome, Taz. No matter how many times this FACT is presented ...  TahitiNut   Jun-19-07 11:59 AM   #38 
  - I couldn't disagree more.  Joe for Clark   Jun-18-07 08:12 PM   #5 
  - of course we do have enough votes to end the war  SergeyDovlatov   Jun-18-07 08:12 PM   #6 
  - They could've not passed anything. They could've sent up the same bill over & over...  BlooInBloo   Jun-18-07 08:14 PM   #7 
  - De-authorize the war.  mmonk   Jun-18-07 08:14 PM   #8 
  - OP should be titled "Gutless Congress Opts to Continue Occupation" n/t  BushDespiser12   Jun-18-07 08:15 PM   #9 
  - "Grandma, why didn't anyone stop the war criminal Bush?"  Solly Mack   Jun-18-07 08:16 PM   #10 
  - Thank you for your sense of realism. No flames here (nt)  ih8thegop   Jun-18-07 08:26 PM   #11 
  - The Republicans have no trouble voting the party line  thunder rising   Jun-18-07 08:31 PM   #13 
     - Actually, Democratic unity this Congress exceeds Republican unity  liberalpragmatist   Jun-18-07 08:35 PM   #14 
  - They chose to collaborate with the Blue Dogs and Bush and make excuses.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Jun-18-07 08:30 PM   #12 
  - Yes they do.  BuyingThyme   Jun-18-07 08:37 PM   #15 
  - We had to blink because the GOP wasn't going to?  sampsonblk   Jun-18-07 08:39 PM   #16 
  - I'm not optimistic that such a strategy would have worked  liberalpragmatist   Jun-18-07 08:53 PM   #22 
  - Each event affects the next  sampsonblk   Jun-19-07 11:23 AM   #37 
  - Nancy's "off the table" edict doomed them to impotent gesture. . .  pat_k   Jun-19-07 03:04 AM   #31 
  - Naughty, naughty! Flying in the face of DU Orthodoxy. Minority opinions are not appreciated.  elocs   Jun-18-07 08:45 PM   #18 
  - Nice vitriol  Moochy   Jun-18-07 08:47 PM   #19 
  - Pragmatism, eh?  Telly Savalas   Jun-18-07 10:35 PM   #29 
  - i agree and i would hope that dems would quit  ellenfl   Jun-18-07 08:50 PM   #21 
  - I am pissed over impeachment is off the table  MissWaverly   Jun-18-07 08:53 PM   #23 
  - Agree.  Xap   Jun-18-07 09:10 PM   #24 
  - You dishonor my troops  thunder rising   Jun-18-07 09:28 PM   #25 
     - Hardly.  Xap   Jun-18-07 09:50 PM   #27 
  - no flames BUT ...  welshTerrier2   Jun-18-07 09:49 PM   #26 
  - Even so, they owed it to the voters to voice their votes. IMHO  spanone   Jun-18-07 09:53 PM   #28 
  - They have the votes to impeach.  pat_k   Jun-19-07 02:48 AM   #30 
  - America The Apologists.  TheWatcher   Jun-19-07 03:08 AM   #33 
     - Wow, I had a different response.  avrdream   Jun-19-07 04:51 AM   #36 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC