krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-19-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #114 |
| 118. And thus pesky reality intrudes :-) |
|
It would also take twice the pressure on the brake drums or rotors to make twice the braking force. Something that might not be achievable.
I've seen some pretty impressive skidmarks on the highways, but you are correct. There weren't 18 of them!
From the car magazine I read, it looks like most passenger vehicles stop in about 170 feet or so from 70 MPH. I don't know what I big rig does, but I would imagine that, fully loaded, it's somewhat more.
|
| -How to increase gas mileage by 39%, or why the truckers are going to be pissed |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 12:41 AM |
#0 |
-
Or: How you will be decapitated |
Veganistan |
Jun-18-07 12:45 AM |
#1 |
 -
Way Too F*cking Dangerous |
rwenos |
Jun-18-07 01:38 AM |
#11 |
  -
You Forgot Something, Though |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 08:46 AM |
#35 |
   -
And you're forgetting normal force. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-18-07 10:41 AM |
#61 |
  -
Sorry. That Defies The Laws Of Physics |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 10:46 AM |
#62 |
   -
Better check the laws of physics. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-18-07 11:09 AM |
#66 |
    -
Nope |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 08:27 AM |
#107 |
   -
Yes, grasshopper. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-19-07 10:48 AM |
#112 |
   -
You're Doing It Again |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 10:52 AM |
#113 |
   -
The force of friction is dependent on the mass of the truck |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:28 AM |
#67 |
  -
It Won't Have Twice The Braking Force, Though |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 11:05 AM |
#114 |
  -
And thus pesky reality intrudes :-) |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 12:40 PM |
#118 |
  -
Here's a interesting link on the topic |
NoGOPZone |
Jun-19-07 02:24 PM |
#124 |
  -
I've seen trucks brake hard... |
skids |
Jun-19-07 06:26 AM |
#105 |
  -
See My Post Above |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 11:08 AM |
#115 |
  -
And the OP is suggesting TEN FEET behind the truck for maximum fuel economy |
kineta |
Jun-19-07 11:12 AM |
#116 |
 -
Well Then, That's The Ultimate Fuel Efficiency, Population Control |
Yavin4 |
Jun-19-07 10:03 AM |
#111 |
-
I've been doing that for yrs when traveling long distance! |
Breeze54 |
Jun-18-07 12:47 AM |
#2 |
-
I don't think the fuel savings is |
CC |
Jun-18-07 12:48 AM |
#3 |
 -
No, but... |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 01:03 AM |
#6 |
 -
Not nearly as much! |
dkofos |
Jun-18-07 09:39 AM |
#48 |
-
It's a dangerous practice |
Lorien |
Jun-18-07 12:48 AM |
#4 |
 -
You're not supposed to tailgate the truck. |
Breeze54 |
Jun-18-07 12:52 AM |
#5 |
-
Driving 2-10 feet behind a truck is tailgating |
Lorien |
Jun-18-07 11:02 AM |
#65 |
-
I don't drive 10 feet behind any moving vehicle ever! |
Breeze54 |
Jun-19-07 05:24 AM |
#99 |
-
I tailgate trucks at times |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Jun-20-07 07:30 AM |
#127 |
-
Drafting will increase drag of trucker ahead of you |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 01:10 AM |
#7 |
 -
I'm sorry but...... |
michreject |
Jun-18-07 07:45 AM |
#28 |
-
actually, drafting behind a similar shaped vehicle, helps |
antifaschits |
Jun-18-07 03:58 PM |
#85 |
-
not sure I follow this |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 04:40 PM |
#94 |
-
In NASCAR races, ten cars can catch one if they team up. |
cherokeeprogressive |
Jun-18-07 04:47 PM |
#95 |
-
Drag on cars |
VTMechEngr |
Jun-18-07 04:49 PM |
#96 |
 -
thanks, that explanation actually sounds reasonable |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 04:57 PM |
#97 |
-
Lets put it this way. |
skids |
Jun-19-07 06:41 AM |
#106 |
-
Following distance too close. You can't stop in time. |
Lex |
Jun-18-07 01:15 AM |
#8 |
 -
Mmmmm.... hot fresh axle... |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 01:25 AM |
#9 |
 -
cars stop a lot faster than trucks. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 01:32 AM |
#10 |
-
One second behind a big rig? |
Lex |
Jun-18-07 01:43 AM |
#12 |
-
i've never had a problem doing it. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 01:52 AM |
#13 |
 -
You know, I'm putting you on ignore for this and this alone |
kgfnally |
Jun-18-07 02:15 AM |
#19 |
  -
it's a very common practice in extremely rural areas. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 06:28 AM |
#26 |
 -
following a big rig at 55 mph at 20ft |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 08:11 AM |
#29 |
  -
actually, no... |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 08:40 AM |
#33 |
   -
you still have that much time to react to the stop |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 09:12 AM |
#36 |
  -
i've been doing it for 20 years or so, my brother-in-law for 30... |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 09:34 AM |
#45 |
  -
exactly. |
antifaschits |
Jun-18-07 04:06 PM |
#87 |
  -
because if and when you DO have a mishap |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 04:34 PM |
#90 |
  -
20 ft? Pffft... 2 ft is the manly thing to do! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:44 AM |
#51 |
 -
a WHOLE two feet? God, you're a pussy |
Bucky |
Jun-19-07 01:25 PM |
#122 |
 -
Ignore the laws of physics and suffer the consequences |
ISUGRADIA |
Jun-18-07 08:30 AM |
#31 |
 -
like the physics involved with the inertia of a huge truck...? |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 08:42 AM |
#34 |
 -
That's true. Trucks cannot stop very fast. |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:51 AM |
#57 |
  -
True, but that trucks not gonna keep moving forward too long if he |
TheFriendlyAnarchist |
Jun-19-07 06:08 AM |
#103 |
 -
Are you saying |
ISUGRADIA |
Jun-18-07 09:57 AM |
#59 |
 -
I think the poster was saying the following... |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 01:46 PM |
#79 |
 -
The car has a superior deceleration curve |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 05:34 AM |
#100 |
 -
Aye! If anyone here has been killed doing this, let them speak up! |
Random_Australian |
Jun-18-07 03:03 AM |
#23 |
-
Think about a turkey |
AngryAmish |
Jun-18-07 09:29 AM |
#40 |
-
Well, the 'safe' distance is 2 seconds or more |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 02:01 AM |
#15 |
-
No thanks. |
impeachdubya |
Jun-18-07 01:54 AM |
#14 |
-
LOL - Jeebus! I'm already paralyzed - you want me brain dead too? |
Rosemary2205 |
Jun-18-07 02:05 AM |
#16 |
 -
You just need a big honkin' piece of Detroit iron like I have |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 02:09 AM |
#17 |
-
Even my Econoline flaps around. |
Rosemary2205 |
Jun-18-07 02:15 AM |
#18 |
-
Econoline... too much sail area |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:34 AM |
#69 |
-
This was common when I was a kid in the early 50s taking Route 66 to LA. |
TahitiNut |
Jun-18-07 02:18 AM |
#20 |
-
This is not a safe practice. It would only be safe if vehicles were driven by computers. |
Selatius |
Jun-18-07 02:23 AM |
#21 |
-
I'm all for fuel efficiency. |
fasttense |
Jun-18-07 02:52 AM |
#22 |
-
This works quite well, is quite dangerous, and you have to keep your eye |
greyhound1966 |
Jun-18-07 03:25 AM |
#24 |
 -
Your radiator fan would kick on |
DS1 |
Jun-18-07 04:04 PM |
#86 |
-
90%? You made that statistic up! |
mainegreen |
Jun-19-07 05:53 AM |
#102 |
-
`No, thank you. I'd like to stay in one piece and live to be real old. |
Hekate |
Jun-18-07 03:26 AM |
#25 |
-
I think there are enough dangerous acts on Highways... |
rasputin1952 |
Jun-18-07 06:55 AM |
#27 |
-
Remember Jayne Mansfield??? Great way to save gas, just don't |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 08:25 AM |
#30 |
-
This is a terribly irresponsible post. How many accidents are caused by tailgating every year? |
Matsubara |
Jun-18-07 08:33 AM |
#32 |
 -
I didn't do the research, nor did I advocate for it |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 05:43 AM |
#101 |
-
You say you are not advocating, but then you say "try it yourself". |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 06:13 AM |
#104 |
-
I think it has been explained pretty thoroghly.... |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 12:22 PM |
#117 |
-
I'm the guy who always leaves the 1 second per 10 mph gap - ALWAYS. |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 12:55 PM |
#119 |
-
One second per 10 MPH gap? |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 01:15 PM |
#120 |
-
Actually, I'm just guessing. I am always sure to keep at least a car length per 10 mph. |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 01:22 PM |
#121 |
-
Same thing, different method |
krispos42 |
Jun-20-07 04:40 AM |
#125 |
-
I'll pass. |
Midlodemocrat |
Jun-18-07 09:16 AM |
#37 |
-
I did it once, when I was young and stupid |
Atman |
Jun-18-07 09:17 AM |
#38 |
 -
Yup, me too when I was 18 and thought I was immortal |
Connonym |
Jun-19-07 09:52 AM |
#110 |
-
No thanks. |
lonestarnot |
Jun-18-07 09:18 AM |
#39 |
-
Post this in the "Too stupid to live" file |
AngryAmish |
Jun-18-07 09:30 AM |
#41 |
-
Well, look at it this way, you can't hit one very hard with only a 20-foot run at it |
ThomWV |
Jun-18-07 09:32 AM |
#42 |
-
If I had someone riding my ass for 10, 12, 14 hours each day |
flvegan |
Jun-18-07 09:33 AM |
#43 |
-
I prefer living over gaining mpg |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:33 AM |
#44 |
 -
What a weird comment! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:42 AM |
#50 |
-
Following too closely to a truck is dangerous |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:45 AM |
#52 |
-
Sorry, I was kidding. What is weird is |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:48 AM |
#54 |
 -
Oh, okay |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:51 AM |
#56 |
-
You contradict youself there |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:50 AM |
#72 |
-
Any vehicle that follows too closely to a truck |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 11:56 AM |
#74 |
-
Just what I mean |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 12:14 PM |
#77 |
-
I do it all the time and I usually get a 25% - 30% increase. |
dkofos |
Jun-18-07 09:36 AM |
#46 |
-
My hope is that people who do this to save gas... |
Balbus |
Jun-18-07 09:37 AM |
#47 |
-
All the savings would go to pay for increased auto insurance |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:41 AM |
#49 |
-
Another "stupid idea department" post. There's already too much in the way of poor driving on the |
LibInTexas |
Jun-18-07 09:46 AM |
#53 |
 -
I think the BEST savings scenario is to stay just behind a truck while |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:49 AM |
#55 |
-
LOL |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:52 AM |
#58 |
-
One Right Behind You Too |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 09:58 AM |
#60 |
-
You'd be hovering! Cool! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 01:39 PM |
#78 |
-
"Just put that hammer down and give it hell!" |
wicket |
Jun-18-07 10:55 AM |
#63 |
-
I used to do this on my motorcycle |
Phx_Dem |
Jun-18-07 10:58 AM |
#64 |
-
As a former tractor trailer driver of 20 + years driving, here are a few hazards not mentioned |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jun-18-07 11:31 AM |
#68 |
 -
HERETIC makes very good points here! |
liam_laddie |
Jun-18-07 11:46 AM |
#71 |
  -
Cruise Control on big trucks; |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jun-18-07 12:09 PM |
#76 |
 -
The tire thing was in the same episode |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:52 AM |
#73 |
-
Cool! Now We Just Gotta Get The Message Out To The Truckers To Do 75-80 So I Can Get Behind Them! |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jun-18-07 11:38 AM |
#70 |
-
And Mythbusters also proved how freaking idiotic it was. |
rinsd |
Jun-18-07 11:58 AM |
#75 |
 -
Yep, but the OP couldn't be bothered even thought they virtually said it |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 04:23 PM |
#89 |
-
Ten feet behind a truck? Not for me |
NoGOPZone |
Jun-18-07 02:26 PM |
#80 |
-
Cool CFD simulation of drafting racers |
entanglement |
Jun-18-07 03:12 PM |
#81 |
-
Does Mythbusters point out |
yella_dawg |
Jun-18-07 03:18 PM |
#82 |
-
can you blame them for screwing with so-called drafters? |
pitohui |
Jun-18-07 03:38 PM |
#83 |
 -
They covered the fact that it was monumentally stupid. |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 03:50 PM |
#84 |
 -
Tend to agree BUT |
VTMechEngr |
Jun-18-07 04:58 PM |
#98 |
-
55 mph = 80 feet per second |
muriel_volestrangler |
Jun-18-07 04:22 PM |
#88 |
 -
I don't know about you, my reaction time is much faster than 1.25 seconds |
DS1 |
Jun-19-07 08:41 AM |
#108 |
-
As I said, that's for the '100 feet back' |
muriel_volestrangler |
Jun-19-07 09:39 AM |
#109 |
-
Cars already try to drive under trucks |
focusfan |
Jun-18-07 04:35 PM |
#91 |
-
great, this thread opens up fun from the "fuck everyone else, I want my mpg" crowd |
ComerPerro |
Jun-18-07 04:36 PM |
#92 |
-
Fuck that. I'd rather deal with a state trooper than an angry trucker. |
Rex |
Jun-18-07 04:37 PM |
#93 |
-
No thanks. I'd rather spend the extra nickel and see America on the open road... |
KansDem |
Jun-19-07 01:28 PM |
#123 |
-
It's already started. I had a guy tailgating me 50 miles down I-65 |
B Calm |
Jun-20-07 05:56 AM |
#126 |
-
not worth it to me |
Smooth Operator |
Jun-20-07 09:07 AM |
#128 |