krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-18-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
| 69. Econoline... too much sail area |
| -How to increase gas mileage by 39%, or why the truckers are going to be pissed |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 12:41 AM |
#0 |
-
Or: How you will be decapitated |
Veganistan |
Jun-18-07 12:45 AM |
#1 |
 -
Way Too F*cking Dangerous |
rwenos |
Jun-18-07 01:38 AM |
#11 |
  -
You Forgot Something, Though |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 08:46 AM |
#35 |
   -
And you're forgetting normal force. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-18-07 10:41 AM |
#61 |
  -
Sorry. That Defies The Laws Of Physics |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 10:46 AM |
#62 |
   -
Better check the laws of physics. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-18-07 11:09 AM |
#66 |
    -
Nope |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 08:27 AM |
#107 |
   -
Yes, grasshopper. |
Bornaginhooligan |
Jun-19-07 10:48 AM |
#112 |
   -
You're Doing It Again |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 10:52 AM |
#113 |
   -
The force of friction is dependent on the mass of the truck |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:28 AM |
#67 |
  -
It Won't Have Twice The Braking Force, Though |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 11:05 AM |
#114 |
  -
And thus pesky reality intrudes :-) |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 12:40 PM |
#118 |
  -
Here's a interesting link on the topic |
NoGOPZone |
Jun-19-07 02:24 PM |
#124 |
  -
I've seen trucks brake hard... |
skids |
Jun-19-07 06:26 AM |
#105 |
  -
See My Post Above |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-19-07 11:08 AM |
#115 |
  -
And the OP is suggesting TEN FEET behind the truck for maximum fuel economy |
kineta |
Jun-19-07 11:12 AM |
#116 |
 -
Well Then, That's The Ultimate Fuel Efficiency, Population Control |
Yavin4 |
Jun-19-07 10:03 AM |
#111 |
-
I've been doing that for yrs when traveling long distance! |
Breeze54 |
Jun-18-07 12:47 AM |
#2 |
-
I don't think the fuel savings is |
CC |
Jun-18-07 12:48 AM |
#3 |
 -
No, but... |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 01:03 AM |
#6 |
 -
Not nearly as much! |
dkofos |
Jun-18-07 09:39 AM |
#48 |
-
It's a dangerous practice |
Lorien |
Jun-18-07 12:48 AM |
#4 |
 -
You're not supposed to tailgate the truck. |
Breeze54 |
Jun-18-07 12:52 AM |
#5 |
-
Driving 2-10 feet behind a truck is tailgating |
Lorien |
Jun-18-07 11:02 AM |
#65 |
-
I don't drive 10 feet behind any moving vehicle ever! |
Breeze54 |
Jun-19-07 05:24 AM |
#99 |
-
I tailgate trucks at times |
JustABozoOnThisBus |
Jun-20-07 07:30 AM |
#127 |
-
Drafting will increase drag of trucker ahead of you |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 01:10 AM |
#7 |
 -
I'm sorry but...... |
michreject |
Jun-18-07 07:45 AM |
#28 |
-
actually, drafting behind a similar shaped vehicle, helps |
antifaschits |
Jun-18-07 03:58 PM |
#85 |
-
not sure I follow this |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 04:40 PM |
#94 |
-
In NASCAR races, ten cars can catch one if they team up. |
cherokeeprogressive |
Jun-18-07 04:47 PM |
#95 |
-
Drag on cars |
VTMechEngr |
Jun-18-07 04:49 PM |
#96 |
 -
thanks, that explanation actually sounds reasonable |
ngant17 |
Jun-18-07 04:57 PM |
#97 |
-
Lets put it this way. |
skids |
Jun-19-07 06:41 AM |
#106 |
-
Following distance too close. You can't stop in time. |
Lex |
Jun-18-07 01:15 AM |
#8 |
 -
Mmmmm.... hot fresh axle... |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 01:25 AM |
#9 |
 -
cars stop a lot faster than trucks. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 01:32 AM |
#10 |
-
One second behind a big rig? |
Lex |
Jun-18-07 01:43 AM |
#12 |
-
i've never had a problem doing it. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 01:52 AM |
#13 |
 -
You know, I'm putting you on ignore for this and this alone |
kgfnally |
Jun-18-07 02:15 AM |
#19 |
  -
it's a very common practice in extremely rural areas. |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 06:28 AM |
#26 |
 -
following a big rig at 55 mph at 20ft |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 08:11 AM |
#29 |
  -
actually, no... |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 08:40 AM |
#33 |
   -
you still have that much time to react to the stop |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 09:12 AM |
#36 |
  -
i've been doing it for 20 years or so, my brother-in-law for 30... |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 09:34 AM |
#45 |
  -
exactly. |
antifaschits |
Jun-18-07 04:06 PM |
#87 |
  -
because if and when you DO have a mishap |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-18-07 04:34 PM |
#90 |
  -
20 ft? Pffft... 2 ft is the manly thing to do! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:44 AM |
#51 |
 -
a WHOLE two feet? God, you're a pussy |
Bucky |
Jun-19-07 01:25 PM |
#122 |
 -
Ignore the laws of physics and suffer the consequences |
ISUGRADIA |
Jun-18-07 08:30 AM |
#31 |
 -
like the physics involved with the inertia of a huge truck...? |
QuestionAll |
Jun-18-07 08:42 AM |
#34 |
 -
That's true. Trucks cannot stop very fast. |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:51 AM |
#57 |
  -
True, but that trucks not gonna keep moving forward too long if he |
TheFriendlyAnarchist |
Jun-19-07 06:08 AM |
#103 |
 -
Are you saying |
ISUGRADIA |
Jun-18-07 09:57 AM |
#59 |
 -
I think the poster was saying the following... |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 01:46 PM |
#79 |
 -
The car has a superior deceleration curve |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 05:34 AM |
#100 |
 -
Aye! If anyone here has been killed doing this, let them speak up! |
Random_Australian |
Jun-18-07 03:03 AM |
#23 |
-
Think about a turkey |
AngryAmish |
Jun-18-07 09:29 AM |
#40 |
-
Well, the 'safe' distance is 2 seconds or more |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 02:01 AM |
#15 |
-
No thanks. |
impeachdubya |
Jun-18-07 01:54 AM |
#14 |
-
LOL - Jeebus! I'm already paralyzed - you want me brain dead too? |
Rosemary2205 |
Jun-18-07 02:05 AM |
#16 |
 -
You just need a big honkin' piece of Detroit iron like I have |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 02:09 AM |
#17 |
-
Even my Econoline flaps around. |
Rosemary2205 |
Jun-18-07 02:15 AM |
#18 |
-
Econoline... too much sail area |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:34 AM |
#69 |
-
This was common when I was a kid in the early 50s taking Route 66 to LA. |
TahitiNut |
Jun-18-07 02:18 AM |
#20 |
-
This is not a safe practice. It would only be safe if vehicles were driven by computers. |
Selatius |
Jun-18-07 02:23 AM |
#21 |
-
I'm all for fuel efficiency. |
fasttense |
Jun-18-07 02:52 AM |
#22 |
-
This works quite well, is quite dangerous, and you have to keep your eye |
greyhound1966 |
Jun-18-07 03:25 AM |
#24 |
 -
Your radiator fan would kick on |
DS1 |
Jun-18-07 04:04 PM |
#86 |
-
90%? You made that statistic up! |
mainegreen |
Jun-19-07 05:53 AM |
#102 |
-
`No, thank you. I'd like to stay in one piece and live to be real old. |
Hekate |
Jun-18-07 03:26 AM |
#25 |
-
I think there are enough dangerous acts on Highways... |
rasputin1952 |
Jun-18-07 06:55 AM |
#27 |
-
Remember Jayne Mansfield??? Great way to save gas, just don't |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 08:25 AM |
#30 |
-
This is a terribly irresponsible post. How many accidents are caused by tailgating every year? |
Matsubara |
Jun-18-07 08:33 AM |
#32 |
 -
I didn't do the research, nor did I advocate for it |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 05:43 AM |
#101 |
-
You say you are not advocating, but then you say "try it yourself". |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 06:13 AM |
#104 |
-
I think it has been explained pretty thoroghly.... |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 12:22 PM |
#117 |
-
I'm the guy who always leaves the 1 second per 10 mph gap - ALWAYS. |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 12:55 PM |
#119 |
-
One second per 10 MPH gap? |
krispos42 |
Jun-19-07 01:15 PM |
#120 |
-
Actually, I'm just guessing. I am always sure to keep at least a car length per 10 mph. |
Matsubara |
Jun-19-07 01:22 PM |
#121 |
-
Same thing, different method |
krispos42 |
Jun-20-07 04:40 AM |
#125 |
-
I'll pass. |
Midlodemocrat |
Jun-18-07 09:16 AM |
#37 |
-
I did it once, when I was young and stupid |
Atman |
Jun-18-07 09:17 AM |
#38 |
 -
Yup, me too when I was 18 and thought I was immortal |
Connonym |
Jun-19-07 09:52 AM |
#110 |
-
No thanks. |
lonestarnot |
Jun-18-07 09:18 AM |
#39 |
-
Post this in the "Too stupid to live" file |
AngryAmish |
Jun-18-07 09:30 AM |
#41 |
-
Well, look at it this way, you can't hit one very hard with only a 20-foot run at it |
ThomWV |
Jun-18-07 09:32 AM |
#42 |
-
If I had someone riding my ass for 10, 12, 14 hours each day |
flvegan |
Jun-18-07 09:33 AM |
#43 |
-
I prefer living over gaining mpg |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:33 AM |
#44 |
 -
What a weird comment! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:42 AM |
#50 |
-
Following too closely to a truck is dangerous |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:45 AM |
#52 |
-
Sorry, I was kidding. What is weird is |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:48 AM |
#54 |
 -
Oh, okay |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:51 AM |
#56 |
-
You contradict youself there |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:50 AM |
#72 |
-
Any vehicle that follows too closely to a truck |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 11:56 AM |
#74 |
-
Just what I mean |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 12:14 PM |
#77 |
-
I do it all the time and I usually get a 25% - 30% increase. |
dkofos |
Jun-18-07 09:36 AM |
#46 |
-
My hope is that people who do this to save gas... |
Balbus |
Jun-18-07 09:37 AM |
#47 |
-
All the savings would go to pay for increased auto insurance |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:41 AM |
#49 |
-
Another "stupid idea department" post. There's already too much in the way of poor driving on the |
LibInTexas |
Jun-18-07 09:46 AM |
#53 |
 -
I think the BEST savings scenario is to stay just behind a truck while |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 09:49 AM |
#55 |
-
LOL |
tammywammy |
Jun-18-07 09:52 AM |
#58 |
-
One Right Behind You Too |
ProfessorGAC |
Jun-18-07 09:58 AM |
#60 |
-
You'd be hovering! Cool! |
firefox_fan |
Jun-18-07 01:39 PM |
#78 |
-
"Just put that hammer down and give it hell!" |
wicket |
Jun-18-07 10:55 AM |
#63 |
-
I used to do this on my motorcycle |
Phx_Dem |
Jun-18-07 10:58 AM |
#64 |
-
As a former tractor trailer driver of 20 + years driving, here are a few hazards not mentioned |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jun-18-07 11:31 AM |
#68 |
 -
HERETIC makes very good points here! |
liam_laddie |
Jun-18-07 11:46 AM |
#71 |
  -
Cruise Control on big trucks; |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jun-18-07 12:09 PM |
#76 |
 -
The tire thing was in the same episode |
krispos42 |
Jun-18-07 11:52 AM |
#73 |
-
Cool! Now We Just Gotta Get The Message Out To The Truckers To Do 75-80 So I Can Get Behind Them! |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME |
Jun-18-07 11:38 AM |
#70 |
-
And Mythbusters also proved how freaking idiotic it was. |
rinsd |
Jun-18-07 11:58 AM |
#75 |
 -
Yep, but the OP couldn't be bothered even thought they virtually said it |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 04:23 PM |
#89 |
-
Ten feet behind a truck? Not for me |
NoGOPZone |
Jun-18-07 02:26 PM |
#80 |
-
Cool CFD simulation of drafting racers |
entanglement |
Jun-18-07 03:12 PM |
#81 |
-
Does Mythbusters point out |
yella_dawg |
Jun-18-07 03:18 PM |
#82 |
-
can you blame them for screwing with so-called drafters? |
pitohui |
Jun-18-07 03:38 PM |
#83 |
 -
They covered the fact that it was monumentally stupid. |
blondeatlast |
Jun-18-07 03:50 PM |
#84 |
 -
Tend to agree BUT |
VTMechEngr |
Jun-18-07 04:58 PM |
#98 |
-
55 mph = 80 feet per second |
muriel_volestrangler |
Jun-18-07 04:22 PM |
#88 |
 -
I don't know about you, my reaction time is much faster than 1.25 seconds |
DS1 |
Jun-19-07 08:41 AM |
#108 |
-
As I said, that's for the '100 feet back' |
muriel_volestrangler |
Jun-19-07 09:39 AM |
#109 |
-
Cars already try to drive under trucks |
focusfan |
Jun-18-07 04:35 PM |
#91 |
-
great, this thread opens up fun from the "fuck everyone else, I want my mpg" crowd |
ComerPerro |
Jun-18-07 04:36 PM |
#92 |
-
Fuck that. I'd rather deal with a state trooper than an angry trucker. |
Rex |
Jun-18-07 04:37 PM |
#93 |
-
No thanks. I'd rather spend the extra nickel and see America on the open road... |
KansDem |
Jun-19-07 01:28 PM |
#123 |
-
It's already started. I had a guy tailgating me 50 miles down I-65 |
B Calm |
Jun-20-07 05:56 AM |
#126 |
-
not worth it to me |
Smooth Operator |
Jun-20-07 09:07 AM |
#128 |