You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: the fcc changed the standard -- that was the problem [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. the fcc changed the standard -- that was the problem
The FCC - and the courts - had consistently adhered to the position that a "fleeting" or "isolated" utterance of an "indecent" word would not subject a broadcaster to liability. There were numerous cases where those words were broadcast -- airings of the Who's song "Who are You" with the lyric "Who the fuck are you" for example; or where an announcer remarked that he had "fucked up" -- that were not found to create liability because they were not repeated and thus did not meet the requirement that they be uttered to achieve "verbal shock treatment".

After Bono of U2 referred to his winning a Golden Globe award as "fucking brilliant", the FCC reversed course and decided that even a single, fleeting, unscripted utterance of the word "fuck" would expose a broadcaster to liability. The FCC then proceeded to riddle its decision with subjective and imprecise exceptions -- for example, the repeated use of the word fuck in Saving Private Ryan was deemed okay as were use of the word during news programming. But a PBS documentary about blues musicians in which one of the musicians used the word fuck was deemed to create liability.

In other words, the FCC made a hash out of it and the court, fortunately, took the appropriate action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC