You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #35: I do believe that the bipartisanship [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I do believe that the bipartisanship
will grow as the elections near.

The question will be, will it grow fast enough?


;-)

And it also grew by popular pressure from bellow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Impeach to Win. Refuse, You Lose. pat_k  May-30-07 11:10 AM   #0 
  - impeach and acquit -- you lose  onenote   May-30-07 11:11 AM   #1 
  - Just like the Republicans did. Oh, wait, they didn't lose. n/t  sfexpat2000   May-30-07 11:17 AM   #3 
  - oh, wait, they did lose  onenote   May-30-07 11:28 AM   #4 
  - Oh yeah, they lost big  magellan   May-30-07 11:47 AM   #8 
  - how many Senate seats can Democrats afford to lose in 2008?  onenote   May-30-07 11:51 AM   #11 
     - And perhaps you're wrong  magellan   May-30-07 12:26 PM   #13 
     - LOL!!!  onenote   May-30-07 12:45 PM   #15 
        - Tell me, what was the bumper crop in '76  nadinbrzezinski   May-30-07 12:47 PM   #16 
        - The premise of this subthread is the consequence of impeachment and acquittal  onenote   May-30-07 01:08 PM   #19 
           - I will correct your history here  nadinbrzezinski   May-30-07 01:22 PM   #20 
              - I stand corrected, although it doesn't change my point  onenote   May-30-07 01:50 PM   #25 
                 - this is where it is more like '74  nadinbrzezinski   May-30-07 01:53 PM   #26 
                    - I understand your point, but still think the big difference is bipartisanship  onenote   May-30-07 02:45 PM   #31 
                       - I do believe that the bipartisanship  nadinbrzezinski   May-30-07 03:32 PM   #35 
        - ROFL!!  magellan   May-30-07 01:01 PM   #17 
        - Sorry, But That Is Pure Non Sequitur  Senator   May-30-07 02:29 PM   #30 
     - You're right!!! For God's sake DON'T DO ANYTHING!!!  jgraz   May-30-07 01:41 PM   #24 
        - Don't even  H2O Man   May-30-07 03:35 PM   #36 
           - Which is hte point I made with my senator today  nadinbrzezinski   May-30-07 07:44 PM   #47 
  - That's true. They had to rig 2000. Point taken. n/t  sfexpat2000   May-30-07 02:02 PM   #28 
  - The impeachment of Bill Clinton was a huge asset to the Repukes  truedelphi   May-30-07 02:59 PM   #32 
  - = the opposite of reality.  pat_k   May-30-07 11:33 AM   #5 
     - "No hearing or investigation will ever get the level of coverage"  onenote   May-30-07 11:38 AM   #7 
     - There is no "cover up" to uncover.  pat_k   May-30-07 12:41 PM   #14 
        - Well said.  Kurovski   May-30-07 01:05 PM   #18 
        - That's the most beautiful piece of writing I've seen on this subject  magellan   May-30-07 01:31 PM   #21 
        - excellent reply -- please consider pulling all these responses together  jgraz   May-30-07 01:59 PM   #27 
        - getting articles of impeachment to the Senate by July 4 is not an achievable goal  onenote   May-30-07 04:25 PM   #40 
           - Of course it is. The only thing stopping them is their irrational. . .  pat_k   May-31-07 01:06 PM   #55 
           - BTW, already dealt with "Republicans won't support it". . .  pat_k   May-31-07 04:55 PM   #60 
     - A-fuckin'-men.  porphyrian   May-30-07 01:34 PM   #22 
     - Confront them with their own words --  pat_k   May-30-07 07:17 PM   #44 
        - No, that's exactly the kind of answer I'm looking for - something to DO.  porphyrian   May-30-07 08:43 PM   #49 
     - Yes. And YES. And YES!!!!!  calimary   May-30-07 07:27 PM   #46 
  - IB/C!!!!! IB/C!!!!! IB/C!!!!! IB/C!!!!! IB/C!!!!! IB/C!!!!!  Norquist Nemesis   May-30-07 11:13 AM   #2 
  - Soooooo many problems with impeachment  ComerPerro   May-30-07 11:37 AM   #6 
  - Sooooooo many more problems with failure to impeach  Senator   May-30-07 11:49 AM   #9 
     - Impeachment with no conviction, with a year and a half left in his second term?  ComerPerro   May-30-07 11:50 AM   #10 
        - Would be a great start. Are you suggesting there's some downside to this?  Senator   May-30-07 02:06 PM   #29 
           - So during the next few months we are going to:  ComerPerro   May-30-07 03:26 PM   #34 
              - Impeachment, even with removal, should take weeks, not months  Senator   May-30-07 03:37 PM   #37 
                 - what I am saying is there are lot of people here who don't have a clue about political processes  ComerPerro   May-30-07 03:40 PM   #38 
                 - Well, that's not quite so  Senator   May-30-07 04:24 PM   #39 
                    - I can't even begin to tell you how many "I am no longer a Dem" posts I've seen  ComerPerro   May-30-07 04:29 PM   #41 
                       - Perhaps you should begin to compare the number you've seen...  Senator   May-30-07 09:05 PM   #50 
                          - maybe Cindy Sheehan should have done the same, eh?  ComerPerro   May-30-07 09:29 PM   #51 
                 - the idea that impeachment and removal could be accomplished in weeks is laughable  onenote   May-30-07 05:10 PM   #43 
                    - <deleted>  pat_k   May-30-07 10:31 PM   #52 
                    - Another evasion of logic and reality.  Senator   May-31-07 02:26 AM   #53 
  - Strong and Right leads to IMPEACHMENT every time too  ThomWV   May-30-07 11:53 AM   #12 
  - Simple enough even for "strategists" to understand. K & R nt  glitch   May-30-07 01:34 PM   #23 
  - Nominated.  H2O Man   May-30-07 03:00 PM   #33 
  - impeach for peace  thegreatcause2   May-30-07 04:38 PM   #42 
  - It worked so well for Gingrich and co., didn't it?  jpgray   May-30-07 07:18 PM   #45 
  - What happened to George McGovern in '72 then?  yurbud   May-30-07 08:19 PM   #48 
     - "dirty tricks not ever seen before in the American democracy"  pat_k   May-31-07 01:05 PM   #54 
        - the one percent doctrine is propaganda not an actual strategic doctrine  yurbud   May-31-07 01:35 PM   #56 
           - Since it is impossible to apply it generally in any sense.  pat_k   May-31-07 02:44 PM   #57 
              - it is only a doctrine in that it can be applied the way cops use the seat belt law  yurbud   May-31-07 03:07 PM   #58 
                 - Yep. Although. . .  pat_k   May-31-07 03:33 PM   #59 
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC