X_Digger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 51. Many rights have inherent dangers. |
|
That however, has never been legal justification by itself for infringing that right.
The fourth, fifth, and eighth amendment sets violent criminals free to continue harming people in society. Yet that's not justification for infringing those rights.
|
| -Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 09:57 AM |
#0 |
 -
When I was attacked by a band of outlaws on the stage from El Paso to Amarillo |
wtmusic |
Jan-23-11 10:01 AM |
#1 |
| -
"Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees" & MORE BLISSFUL for anti-gun posters on Internet forums. |
jody |
Jan-23-11 10:08 AM |
#2 |
 -
Ironic, isn't it... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:25 AM |
#4 |
 -
how blissfull it is to ignore the 2nd, 5th, and 14th amendments |
AlbertCat |
Jan-23-11 12:29 PM |
#10 |
| -
Four things... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 03:29 PM |
#16 |
| -
Hmmm, no rebuttles to this post. (nt) |
SlimJimmy |
Jan-24-11 07:35 AM |
#38 |
| -
one - two - three |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:24 PM |
# |
| -
one - two - three |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:24 PM |
#22 |
| -
Give Us A Cogent, Persuasive Argument For Why 30-Round Magazines Are Needed. |
Paladin |
Jan-23-11 10:38 AM |
#8 |
| -
That's not how a free society works... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:43 AM |
#9 |
| -
Typical. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:07 AM |
#33 |
| -
I'm not the one trying to restrict the actions of others... the valid argument is YOURS to supply. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 09:01 AM |
#40 |
| -
Then why can't I have a nuclear bomb? |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 05:58 AM |
#35 |
| -
Actually, the 1934 NFA has covered that issue... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 08:47 AM |
#39 |
| -
So you're willing to allow the govt to regulate of one type of weapon, but not another? |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 06:21 PM |
#53 |
| -
self delete... double post. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:25 PM |
# |
| -
Well, the ATF legally defined those devices and SCOTUS upheld those definitions and regulations... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:25 PM |
#54 |
| -
So, it IS arbitrary. |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 07:54 PM |
#55 |
| -
I think "discrete" is the word you were looking for... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:58 PM |
#56 |
| -
Because beer comes in 24 packs |
Politicalboi |
Jan-23-11 02:19 PM |
#14 |
| -
Because my handgun is designed to carry 15+1. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 04:54 PM |
#23 |
| -
You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:08 AM |
# |
| -
48 states disagree with you. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-24-11 11:37 AM |
#42 |
| -
You are a danger to us all |
HelenWheels |
Jan-24-11 01:52 PM |
#44 |
| -
Well shit, I guess all my guns are broken then. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-24-11 02:14 PM |
#45 |
| -
Are you serious? |
HelenWheels |
Jan-25-11 04:19 PM |
#57 |
| -
Ahh, the 'gunz are to keel' canard.. |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:00 PM |
#49 |
| -
You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:08 AM |
#34 |
| -
For what sort of firearms? |
Atypical Liberal |
Jan-23-11 07:45 PM |
#30 |
| -
Laugh Out Loud! |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:21 PM |
#21 |
| -
In only 28% of defensive gun use |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 10:21 AM |
#3 |
| -
Go ahead, ban them... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:29 AM |
#5 |
| -
Not really, |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 10:36 AM |
#6 |
| -
So would you stop them from being used on a a shooting range ... |
spin |
Jan-23-11 12:33 PM |
#11 |
| -
Here is what I'd do. |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 03:29 PM |
#17 |
| -
Possession of full autos was not prohibited... even in public. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 03:47 PM |
#20 |
| -
Boy that would have really stopped Loughner, wound't it? |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 05:00 PM |
#25 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-23-11 12:34 PM |
#12 |
| -
self-delete |
zinnisking |
Jan-23-11 07:13 PM |
#29 |
| -
"Gadzooks, Abe! If you push for Emancipation, we'll lose the South!" |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 06:01 AM |
#36 |
| -
Yeah, the only difference is YOU'RE the one's supporting loss of liberties. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 11:08 AM |
#41 |
| -
that depends.... |
DRex |
Jan-24-11 04:31 PM |
#52 |
| -
Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime? How effective were God's Ten Commandments... |
jody |
Jan-23-11 10:36 AM |
#7 |
| -
Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime? |
AlbertCat |
Jan-23-11 12:36 PM |
#13 |
| -
Please google malum in se , malum prohibitum n/t |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:11 PM |
#50 |
| -
Do you actually believe a gun will protect you? |
bongbong |
Jan-23-11 03:36 PM |
#18 |
| -
Why does this always devolve into this? |
booley |
Jan-23-11 03:43 PM |
#19 |
| -
There are several issues that divide voters into polarized groups and for which no compromise seems |
jody |
Jan-23-11 05:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sorry but that's a lot of straw man/excluded middle clap trap |
booley |
Jan-24-11 01:32 AM |
#32 |
| -
So you're 1 anti and 2 pro. Thanks for acknowledging the point I made. Have a great day. nt |
jody |
Jan-24-11 06:27 AM |
#37 |
| -
Many rights have inherent dangers. |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
That's great, now post the average number of rounds fired in criminal acts. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 04:55 PM |
#24 |
| -
I'm gonna be 66 next month |
Plucketeer |
Jan-23-11 02:41 PM |
#15 |
| -
That was your choice and it has worked well for you... |
spin |
Jan-24-11 11:38 AM |
#43 |
| -
Yes! Everybody needs MORE guns. LOL! |
Plucketeer |
Jan-24-11 03:24 PM |
#46 |
| -
OK so what other unalienable/inalienable rights do you want to prohibit? nt |
jody |
Jan-24-11 03:49 PM |
#48 |
| -
That would be a legitimate question |
Plucketeer |
Jan-25-11 05:52 PM |
#58 |
| -
Molestation hasn't become a part of Mass either |
underpants |
Jan-23-11 05:53 PM |
#27 |
| -
The REAL reason |
1American |
Jan-23-11 06:05 PM |
#28 |
| -
When a person has a handgun in their house, |
RowdyRacer |
Jan-23-11 09:05 PM |
#31 |
| -
Please provide a source for your assertion. IMO anyone who uses "Dumb" not knowing that it means |
jody |
Jan-24-11 03:48 PM |
#47 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread