You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #47: Please provide a source for your assertion. IMO anyone who uses "Dumb" not knowing that it means [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-24-11 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. Please provide a source for your assertion. IMO anyone who uses "Dumb" not knowing that it means
"lacking the human power of speech" disparages all who have that infirmity, is either "stupid" or "evil" and I know what those two latter words mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees Charleston Chew  Jan-23-11 09:57 AM   #0 
  - When I was attacked by a band of outlaws on the stage from El Paso to Amarillo  wtmusic   Jan-23-11 10:01 AM   #1 
  - "Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees" & MORE BLISSFUL for anti-gun posters on Internet forums.  jody   Jan-23-11 10:08 AM   #2 
  - Ironic, isn't it...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-23-11 10:25 AM   #4 
  - how blissfull it is to ignore the 2nd, 5th, and 14th amendments  AlbertCat   Jan-23-11 12:29 PM   #10 
     - Four things...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-23-11 03:29 PM   #16 
     - Hmmm, no rebuttles to this post. (nt)  SlimJimmy   Jan-24-11 07:35 AM   #38 
     - one - two - three  Charleston Chew   Jan-23-11 04:24 PM   # 
     - one - two - three  Charleston Chew   Jan-23-11 04:24 PM   #22 
  - Give Us A Cogent, Persuasive Argument For Why 30-Round Magazines Are Needed.  Paladin   Jan-23-11 10:38 AM   #8 
  - That's not how a free society works...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-23-11 10:43 AM   #9 
  - Typical.  bowens43   Jan-24-11 05:07 AM   #33 
  - I'm not the one trying to restrict the actions of others... the valid argument is YOURS to supply.  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 09:01 AM   #40 
  - Then why can't I have a nuclear bomb?  baldguy   Jan-24-11 05:58 AM   #35 
     - Actually, the 1934 NFA has covered that issue...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 08:47 AM   #39 
        - So you're willing to allow the govt to regulate of one type of weapon, but not another?  baldguy   Jan-24-11 06:21 PM   #53 
           - self delete... double post.  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 07:25 PM   # 
           - Well, the ATF legally defined those devices and SCOTUS upheld those definitions and regulations...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 07:25 PM   #54 
              - So, it IS arbitrary.  baldguy   Jan-24-11 07:54 PM   #55 
                 - I think "discrete" is the word you were looking for...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 07:58 PM   #56 
  - Because beer comes in 24 packs  Politicalboi   Jan-23-11 02:19 PM   #14 
  - Because my handgun is designed to carry 15+1.  AtheistCrusader   Jan-23-11 04:54 PM   #23 
  - You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all.  bowens43   Jan-24-11 05:08 AM   # 
  - 48 states disagree with you.  AtheistCrusader   Jan-24-11 11:37 AM   #42 
     - You are a danger to us all  HelenWheels   Jan-24-11 01:52 PM   #44 
        - Well shit, I guess all my guns are broken then.  AtheistCrusader   Jan-24-11 02:14 PM   #45 
        - Are you serious?  HelenWheels   Jan-25-11 04:19 PM   #57 
        - Ahh, the 'gunz are to keel' canard..  X_Digger   Jan-24-11 04:00 PM   #49 
  - You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all.  bowens43   Jan-24-11 05:08 AM   #34 
  - For what sort of firearms?  Atypical Liberal   Jan-23-11 07:45 PM   #30 
  - Laugh Out Loud!  Charleston Chew   Jan-23-11 04:21 PM   #21 
  - In only 28% of defensive gun use  safeinOhio   Jan-23-11 10:21 AM   #3 
  - Go ahead, ban them...  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-23-11 10:29 AM   #5 
  - Not really,  safeinOhio   Jan-23-11 10:36 AM   #6 
  - So would you stop them from being used on a a shooting range ...  spin   Jan-23-11 12:33 PM   #11 
  - Here is what I'd do.  safeinOhio   Jan-23-11 03:29 PM   #17 
     - Possession of full autos was not prohibited... even in public.  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-23-11 03:47 PM   #20 
  - Boy that would have really stopped Loughner, wound't it?  AtheistCrusader   Jan-23-11 05:00 PM   #25 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Jan-23-11 12:34 PM   #12 
  - self-delete  zinnisking   Jan-23-11 07:13 PM   #29 
  - "Gadzooks, Abe! If you push for Emancipation, we'll lose the South!"  baldguy   Jan-24-11 06:01 AM   #36 
     - Yeah, the only difference is YOU'RE the one's supporting loss of liberties.  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-24-11 11:08 AM   #41 
        - that depends....  DRex   Jan-24-11 04:31 PM   #52 
  - Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime? How effective were God's Ten Commandments...  jody   Jan-23-11 10:36 AM   #7 
  - Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime?  AlbertCat   Jan-23-11 12:36 PM   #13 
  - Please google malum in se , malum prohibitum n/t  X_Digger   Jan-24-11 04:11 PM   #50 
  - Do you actually believe a gun will protect you?  bongbong   Jan-23-11 03:36 PM   #18 
  - Why does this always devolve into this?  booley   Jan-23-11 03:43 PM   #19 
     - There are several issues that divide voters into polarized groups and for which no compromise seems  jody   Jan-23-11 05:12 PM   #26 
        - Sorry but that's a lot of straw man/excluded middle clap trap  booley   Jan-24-11 01:32 AM   #32 
           - So you're 1 anti and 2 pro. Thanks for acknowledging the point I made. Have a great day. nt  jody   Jan-24-11 06:27 AM   #37 
           - Many rights have inherent dangers.  X_Digger   Jan-24-11 04:16 PM   #51 
  - That's great, now post the average number of rounds fired in criminal acts.  AtheistCrusader   Jan-23-11 04:55 PM   #24 
  - I'm gonna be 66 next month  Plucketeer   Jan-23-11 02:41 PM   #15 
  - That was your choice and it has worked well for you...  spin   Jan-24-11 11:38 AM   #43 
     - Yes! Everybody needs MORE guns. LOL!  Plucketeer   Jan-24-11 03:24 PM   #46 
        - OK so what other unalienable/inalienable rights do you want to prohibit? nt  jody   Jan-24-11 03:49 PM   #48 
           - That would be a legitimate question  Plucketeer   Jan-25-11 05:52 PM   #58 
  - Molestation hasn't become a part of Mass either  underpants   Jan-23-11 05:53 PM   #27 
  - The REAL reason  1American   Jan-23-11 06:05 PM   #28 
     - When a person has a handgun in their house,  RowdyRacer   Jan-23-11 09:05 PM   #31 
        - Please provide a source for your assertion. IMO anyone who uses "Dumb" not knowing that it means  jody   Jan-24-11 03:48 PM   #47 

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC