Charleston Chew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-23-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| -Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 09:57 AM |
#0 |
 -
When I was attacked by a band of outlaws on the stage from El Paso to Amarillo |
wtmusic |
Jan-23-11 10:01 AM |
#1 |
| -
"Ignorance Is Bliss for Gun Show Attendees" & MORE BLISSFUL for anti-gun posters on Internet forums. |
jody |
Jan-23-11 10:08 AM |
#2 |
 -
Ironic, isn't it... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:25 AM |
#4 |
 -
how blissfull it is to ignore the 2nd, 5th, and 14th amendments |
AlbertCat |
Jan-23-11 12:29 PM |
#10 |
| -
Four things... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 03:29 PM |
#16 |
| -
Hmmm, no rebuttles to this post. (nt) |
SlimJimmy |
Jan-24-11 07:35 AM |
#38 |
| -
one - two - three |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:24 PM |
# |
| -
one - two - three |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:24 PM |
#22 |
| -
Give Us A Cogent, Persuasive Argument For Why 30-Round Magazines Are Needed. |
Paladin |
Jan-23-11 10:38 AM |
#8 |
| -
That's not how a free society works... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:43 AM |
#9 |
| -
Typical. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:07 AM |
#33 |
| -
I'm not the one trying to restrict the actions of others... the valid argument is YOURS to supply. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 09:01 AM |
#40 |
| -
Then why can't I have a nuclear bomb? |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 05:58 AM |
#35 |
| -
Actually, the 1934 NFA has covered that issue... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 08:47 AM |
#39 |
| -
So you're willing to allow the govt to regulate of one type of weapon, but not another? |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 06:21 PM |
#53 |
| -
self delete... double post. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:25 PM |
# |
| -
Well, the ATF legally defined those devices and SCOTUS upheld those definitions and regulations... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:25 PM |
#54 |
| -
So, it IS arbitrary. |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 07:54 PM |
#55 |
| -
I think "discrete" is the word you were looking for... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 07:58 PM |
#56 |
| -
Because beer comes in 24 packs |
Politicalboi |
Jan-23-11 02:19 PM |
#14 |
| -
Because my handgun is designed to carry 15+1. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 04:54 PM |
#23 |
| -
You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:08 AM |
# |
| -
48 states disagree with you. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-24-11 11:37 AM |
#42 |
| -
You are a danger to us all |
HelenWheels |
Jan-24-11 01:52 PM |
#44 |
| -
Well shit, I guess all my guns are broken then. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-24-11 02:14 PM |
#45 |
| -
Are you serious? |
HelenWheels |
Jan-25-11 04:19 PM |
#57 |
| -
Ahh, the 'gunz are to keel' canard.. |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:00 PM |
#49 |
| -
You shouldn'ty be able to carry any at all. |
bowens43 |
Jan-24-11 05:08 AM |
#34 |
| -
For what sort of firearms? |
Atypical Liberal |
Jan-23-11 07:45 PM |
#30 |
| -
Laugh Out Loud! |
Charleston Chew |
Jan-23-11 04:21 PM |
#21 |
| -
In only 28% of defensive gun use |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 10:21 AM |
#3 |
| -
Go ahead, ban them... |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 10:29 AM |
#5 |
| -
Not really, |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 10:36 AM |
#6 |
| -
So would you stop them from being used on a a shooting range ... |
spin |
Jan-23-11 12:33 PM |
#11 |
| -
Here is what I'd do. |
safeinOhio |
Jan-23-11 03:29 PM |
#17 |
| -
Possession of full autos was not prohibited... even in public. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-23-11 03:47 PM |
#20 |
| -
Boy that would have really stopped Loughner, wound't it? |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 05:00 PM |
#25 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-23-11 12:34 PM |
#12 |
| -
self-delete |
zinnisking |
Jan-23-11 07:13 PM |
#29 |
| -
"Gadzooks, Abe! If you push for Emancipation, we'll lose the South!" |
baldguy |
Jan-24-11 06:01 AM |
#36 |
| -
Yeah, the only difference is YOU'RE the one's supporting loss of liberties. |
OneTenthofOnePercent |
Jan-24-11 11:08 AM |
#41 |
| -
that depends.... |
DRex |
Jan-24-11 04:31 PM |
#52 |
| -
Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime? How effective were God's Ten Commandments... |
jody |
Jan-23-11 10:36 AM |
#7 |
| -
Do you actually believe a law will protect you from crime? |
AlbertCat |
Jan-23-11 12:36 PM |
#13 |
| -
Please google malum in se , malum prohibitum n/t |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:11 PM |
#50 |
| -
Do you actually believe a gun will protect you? |
bongbong |
Jan-23-11 03:36 PM |
#18 |
| -
Why does this always devolve into this? |
booley |
Jan-23-11 03:43 PM |
#19 |
| -
There are several issues that divide voters into polarized groups and for which no compromise seems |
jody |
Jan-23-11 05:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
Sorry but that's a lot of straw man/excluded middle clap trap |
booley |
Jan-24-11 01:32 AM |
#32 |
| -
So you're 1 anti and 2 pro. Thanks for acknowledging the point I made. Have a great day. nt |
jody |
Jan-24-11 06:27 AM |
#37 |
| -
Many rights have inherent dangers. |
X_Digger |
Jan-24-11 04:16 PM |
#51 |
| -
That's great, now post the average number of rounds fired in criminal acts. |
AtheistCrusader |
Jan-23-11 04:55 PM |
#24 |
| -
I'm gonna be 66 next month |
Plucketeer |
Jan-23-11 02:41 PM |
#15 |
| -
That was your choice and it has worked well for you... |
spin |
Jan-24-11 11:38 AM |
#43 |
| -
Yes! Everybody needs MORE guns. LOL! |
Plucketeer |
Jan-24-11 03:24 PM |
#46 |
| -
OK so what other unalienable/inalienable rights do you want to prohibit? nt |
jody |
Jan-24-11 03:49 PM |
#48 |
| -
That would be a legitimate question |
Plucketeer |
Jan-25-11 05:52 PM |
#58 |
| -
Molestation hasn't become a part of Mass either |
underpants |
Jan-23-11 05:53 PM |
#27 |
| -
The REAL reason |
1American |
Jan-23-11 06:05 PM |
#28 |
| -
When a person has a handgun in their house, |
RowdyRacer |
Jan-23-11 09:05 PM |
#31 |
| -
Please provide a source for your assertion. IMO anyone who uses "Dumb" not knowing that it means |
jody |
Jan-24-11 03:48 PM |
#47 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread