Reply #60: In the past I have liked chipping at CNN.

[RandomThoughts]

And even mentioned Sanchez in the past.

But this rocks, well said Rick.

And although I am not Joe the plumber, I am obnoxious, and in my personal obnoxious fashion, I agree, he is a putz.

And as an obnoxious person, who could be called one of those persons who goes to others barbecues,

and even though I am a person like that, I still have to say "well said Sanchez".


One more thing, is Joe the Plumber saying nobody should report on war any different then major media not reporting on the guy down the street. "who was not made famous by John McCain and Sara Palin" and instead reporting on an asinine avatar like Joe the plumber.

Come on, we know he is manufactured, now we even know his name is not even Joe, and yet that was the reporting of his initial interaction in the media. Is not his comment about not reporting war news, equal to the way you covered Joe during the campaign, the way you allowed him to be manufactured by some entity?

Your right, he is ridiculous, but part of his ridiculous is how he was manufactured and propped up for weeks, without any reason, except that he would take any check offered to him.

I also find it funny you make the following statement.

The guy who lives down the street, The guy who shows up at the backyard barbecue when there is free food. You know that guy, knows everything about everything, but really knows nothing, hates everything and everybody, can't understand why anyone would find any fault with him, you know the obnoxious guy,
There is always one at every gathering or every park, but that guy was not made famous by John McCain or Sara Palin, you were Sam.

wow, if there is a guy like that why hasn't the media spoken of him, except to make attacks that are unable to be responded to, because he was not made known by McCain/Palin, nor the media?

Well here is my question, if there is a guy down the street not made famous, and you can make those malicious comments about him, and then admit that he has no retort by being unknown, because media control has hidden him, well, how can you make such comments about him?

My question is why do you make such astute evaluations of Joe, the Joe that the media elevated, but then go off on a tangent about some unknown guy. This interjection seems removed and unrelated to Joe. If there is a guy down the street with all these qualities, and you want to roast him, well, then why hasn't the media revealed he exist? Maybe because by not reporting, you can say whatever you want, the same thing that would happen if Joe had his way, with no reporters in war zones.

Maybe the media does not want to cover certain things, making you no different then Joe.