Reply #11: he walked because of what he said ...

[Gonnuts]

in order to stay you sign a confidentiality statement, in other words you give your word nothing leaves this room ... that's why he challenged it and stressed a very high-threshold must be regarded.

my suspicions run much deeper ... with the resignation of Fallon, Iran is in the cross-hairs. The economy is gone, it will take another month or so before it really sinks in how bad things are going to get before panic sets in ... this was a "save your ass" secret meeting ... FISA may have been mentioned as a if you allow this it will accelerate the end ... but nothing more. My guess is when the food riots set in the unleashing of Draconian measures already in place is what was discussed.

Look, folks, whether by design or not we've crossed over the Rubicon, zipped past Fail Safe, there is no "fixing it" ... from here we start to find out what the phrase "pay-back is a bitch" really means ...

Would it have been better for DK to go to the meeting and betray his word if he were to gain evidence of criminal activity? To tell you the truth, as bad as things are now if it meant exposure of high crimes, just my thirst for some form of accountability, I wouldn't hold it against him, but he's the one who's word would of been broken. What I'm more interested in is his seemingly contradictory remark stating that there have been only 5 times before in 187 years that this procedure was granted yet he made reference as though he had attended several ... are there degrees of secret meetings? Now that time has pasted can DK tell us what was discussed at those meetings he did attend?