auburnblu
(536 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Apr-10-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
| 42. Damn, it was an order |
|
Why don't you do a fact check? I'm saying I don't give a damn what the team decided or agreed to. Three players who were NOT present should not have been ordered to take a dna test in the first place.
|
| -ALL, repeat ALL white players tested? |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:09 PM |
#0 |
-
If nobody orgasmed... How could there be seminal DNA? nt |
benburch |
Apr-10-06 10:11 PM |
#1 |
 -
Yes, just like a girl can get pregnant with no orgasm |
MiniMe |
Apr-10-06 10:25 PM |
#7 |
  -
Yeah - but it probably has some DNA...(nt) |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:34 PM |
#12 |
 -
Exactly my point. : ) |
MiniMe |
Apr-10-06 10:48 PM |
#23 |
 -
One sperm would indicate in a DNA test??? |
U4ikLefty |
Apr-11-06 10:05 PM |
#63 |
 -
DNA is DNA no matter what |
azurnoir |
Apr-10-06 10:41 PM |
#17 |
-
Exactly. |
benburch |
Apr-10-06 10:44 PM |
#20 |
-
Wasn't it voluntary? |
Cronus Protagonist |
Apr-10-06 10:13 PM |
#2 |
 -
If he was at the party yeah |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:34 PM |
#13 |
-
makes you wonder in this CSI world if they wore hats. probably. |
roguevalley |
Apr-10-06 10:14 PM |
#3 |
-
She claimed her attackers were white and on the LAX team...? |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:17 PM |
#4 |
 -
Its that ALL were tested |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:26 PM |
#8 |
-
What if, What if...who cares about "what if...! |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:32 PM |
#10 |
 -
They were not all there |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:43 PM |
#19 |
-
so how do the cops know for sure who was at the party |
freeplessinseattle |
Apr-11-06 02:20 AM |
#58 |
-
how hard is it to read the forum warnings? |
alcibiades_mystery |
Apr-10-06 10:21 PM |
#5 |
-
Racism and sensationalism, anyone? |
Redstone |
Apr-10-06 10:21 PM |
#6 |
 -
Whoops. My point is potential profiling |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:28 PM |
#9 |
-
Figure out if they were all there FIRST - then post...! (nt) |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:33 PM |
#11 |
 -
Three WERE NOT even there |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:42 PM |
#18 |
-
They were uncooperative... |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:47 PM |
#22 |
 -
Depends on the alibi |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:56 PM |
#27 |
-
your point is that innocent men have to give DNA samples |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-10-06 11:12 PM |
#34 |
-
But Players NOT repeat NOT at the party |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:18 PM |
#36 |
-
You need to be sure that the samples were not voluntary... |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 11:25 PM |
#38 |
 -
Damn, it was an order |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:34 PM |
#42 |
 -
Before you post again, read the Constitution |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:49 PM |
#45 |
-
Dude - drop the sanctimony... |
hexola |
Apr-11-06 12:06 AM |
#50 |
-
You had a tude too |
auburnblu |
Apr-11-06 12:20 AM |
#54 |
-
Were they ordered? By whom? I suspect they did so voluntarily. |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-10-06 11:33 PM |
#41 |
-
Ordered by the police authorized by the Court |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:39 PM |
#43 |
-
dupe |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-10-06 11:48 PM |
#44 |
-
that order had to come from the court |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-10-06 11:54 PM |
#47 |
 -
Order...this is the sort of semantic failing common in the media today... |
hexola |
Apr-11-06 12:03 AM |
#49 |
-
Yes!!! |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-11-06 12:16 AM |
#52 |
-
Sorry pal...not buying it... |
hexola |
Apr-11-06 12:00 AM |
#48 |
-
it appears they did have an order, a warrant, from the court |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-11-06 12:20 AM |
#53 |
-
Do you have to question every post? |
auburnblu |
Apr-11-06 12:25 AM |
#55 |
-
See Ya fellas!!! |
hexola |
Apr-11-06 12:27 AM |
#56 |
-
Your article says that the samples were collected on the 23rd |
MrMonk |
Apr-10-06 11:06 PM |
#31 |
-
Im not sure we really know all the samples were ordered...? |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 11:11 PM |
#33 |
-
They should have asked/researched |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:13 PM |
#35 |
-
ALL white men on the lacrosse team were tested because |
MrMonk |
Apr-10-06 10:35 PM |
#14 |
-
This is more sinister...Sports Profiling!!! |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:37 PM |
#15 |
-
Yes it is |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:45 PM |
#21 |
-
there is only one black guy on the team |
benddem |
Apr-10-06 10:39 PM |
#16 |
 -
So test those who were THERE |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 10:50 PM |
#24 |
-
What if...someone had an alibi - but they found their DNA on her? |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 10:54 PM |
#26 |
-
What if someone was out of town? |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:04 PM |
#29 |
-
If all she had as ID was "a black guy on the football team"... |
hexola |
Apr-10-06 11:21 PM |
#37 |
-
So test black guys for crimes not at scene of incident? |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:29 PM |
#40 |
-
Welcome to Black America....... |
MadMaddie |
Apr-10-06 10:51 PM |
#25 |
 -
Good example |
auburnblu |
Apr-10-06 11:01 PM |
#28 |
-
Is the problem "racist profiling" or "racial profiling"? |
hexola |
Apr-11-06 12:16 AM |
#51 |
-
No DNA does not mean no rape. |
KitchenWitch |
Apr-10-06 11:05 PM |
#30 |
 -
the affidavit for the search warrant said she was raped ... |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-11-06 02:25 AM |
#59 |
-
Okies, well why DNA test all of them ... No DNA was found to match |
sproutster |
Apr-10-06 11:08 PM |
#32 |
 -
Hello? That is not true. They did find DNA belonging to two men |
lizzy |
Apr-10-06 11:28 PM |
#39 |
  -
But it's the bathroom |
sproutster |
Apr-11-06 06:47 AM |
#60 |
 -
Yea, so? She alleged the rape took place in the bathroom. |
lizzy |
Apr-11-06 06:51 AM |
#61 |
 -
You do understand.... |
jberryhill |
Apr-11-06 10:01 PM |
#62 |
 -
Ejaculation is not required when raping someone n/t |
cynatnite |
Apr-10-06 11:51 PM |
#46 |
-
Here is the actual search warrant issued. |
Neil Lisst |
Apr-11-06 02:13 AM |
#57 |
-
I know one thing, if I was on that team and wasn't at the party... |
cat_girl25 |
Apr-11-06 10:07 PM |
#64 |
-
Since you are all about truth...why not enable your profile??? n/t |
U4ikLefty |
Apr-11-06 10:12 PM |
#65 |