oasis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-28-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
| 56. Excellent post. (n/t) |
| -Is Senator Hillary Clinton pro Iraq War? |
IsItJustMe |
Mar-28-06 12:13 PM |
#0 |
 -
shes in the "Stay the course" camp |
LSK |
Mar-28-06 12:14 PM |
#1 |
  -
Would that be the "Support our Oops" camp? (n/t) |
coalition_unwilling |
Mar-28-06 02:44 PM |
#26 |
| -
There are no Democratic Senators who are Pro-Iraq War. n/t |
Clarkie1 |
Mar-28-06 12:15 PM |
#2 |
| -
If she is wanting to send more troops over there, you may argue that she's |
IsItJustMe |
Mar-28-06 12:20 PM |
#4 |
| -
Before the war, a lot of my republican co-workers told me... |
Yollam |
Mar-28-06 12:29 PM |
#11 |
| -
Uh? |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 12:50 PM |
#14 |
| -
I would argue that anyone who votes to fund it is for the war... |
harpo |
Mar-28-06 02:48 PM |
#29 |
| -
Wow the things you learn on the DU! |
Generator |
Mar-28-06 03:48 PM |
#53 |
| -
Yes, absolutely. If she wasn't you'd know. |
BuyingThyme |
Mar-28-06 12:16 PM |
#3 |
| -
Hillary and many other Democrats are "pro-not leaving Iraq in a mess." |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 12:21 PM |
#5 |
| -
Odd way of stating it. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 12:52 PM |
#15 |
| -
Like to take a crack at answering the question on post #10? |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 01:11 PM |
#16 |
| -
That is a non answer, as was pointed out in the reply. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 01:56 PM |
#19 |
| -
Only straight answers huh? Okay. Hillary would say "no" . I say "no" and |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 02:11 PM |
#20 |
| -
Say no to what? |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 02:26 PM |
#21 |
| -
The OP's question: Is Hillary pro-Iraq war?. I say "no". |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 02:31 PM |
#23 |
| -
You are playing word games. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 02:55 PM |
#34 |
| -
"word games"? "common understanding"? The bottom line answer to the OP's |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:08 PM |
#37 |
| -
Here is what Senator Clinton said. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:21 PM |
#39 |
| -
"Concluding the war" means ending it. How is that "pro war"? |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:29 PM |
#42 |
| -
You left out the 'Winning and' part. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:36 PM |
#46 |
| -
"Concluding" was the key word. Hillary wants our troops out of there. |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:45 PM |
#52 |
| -
Now you are just making stuff up. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:53 PM |
#54 |
| -
I'm telling you what she means. Let go of you bias for a bit and read |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 04:05 PM |
#58 |
| -
The objectivity lacking is over in your court. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 04:28 PM |
#60 |
| -
Concluding the war with the most positive results possible, could be |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 05:05 PM |
#61 |
| -
More word salads |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 05:13 PM |
#62 |
| -
You're welcome. (n/t) |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 05:30 PM |
#63 |
| -
Then send engineers, construction workers, etc. Why more troops? |
shain from kane |
Mar-28-06 01:17 PM |
#17 |
| -
Who's going to keep the construction folks from being shot at? |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 01:50 PM |
#18 |
| -
So our military should be used to protect construction |
shain from kane |
Mar-28-06 02:41 PM |
#25 |
| -
Actually we are doing just that. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 02:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
In the 1800's, railroad tracks were laid across America under the |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:18 PM |
#38 |
| -
So lets get this straight. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:24 PM |
#41 |
| -
See post # 17 by Shian 'Kane. He says we should bring in engineers, |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:34 PM |
#45 |
| -
So our nation's "manifest destiny" is to conquer and occupy Iraq? |
shain from kane |
Mar-28-06 03:32 PM |
#43 |
| -
How did you arrive at that conclusion? |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:40 PM |
#50 |
| -
"Pro-not leaving Iraq in a mess" |
GreenArrow |
Mar-28-06 03:00 PM |
#36 |
| -
Sadly, Hill didn't have a hand in drawing up the blueprints for the war. |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:22 PM |
#40 |
| -
but she does have a hand |
GreenArrow |
Mar-28-06 03:37 PM |
#47 |
| -
Or a simple no vote. |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:42 PM |
#51 |
| -
ah yes, "success and honor!" |
GreenArrow |
Mar-28-06 03:57 PM |
#57 |
| -
Too late |
mmonk |
Mar-28-06 03:38 PM |
#48 |
| -
yes |
wuushew |
Mar-28-06 12:21 PM |
#6 |
| -
IMHO, Hillary is "Pro Hillary Clinton" |
hughee99 |
Mar-28-06 12:22 PM |
#7 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-28-06 12:24 PM |
#8 |
| -
Leading Dems who want our troops out of Iraq within the next 5 min. are? |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 12:29 PM |
#10 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Mar-28-06 12:33 PM |
#12 |
| -
Welcome to DU. As for Feingold vs. Hillary in the 2008 primaries.... |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 12:44 PM |
#13 |
| -
Far as I know |
Nite Owl |
Mar-28-06 12:26 PM |
#9 |
| -
She voted for it and still supports the occupation. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Mar-28-06 02:27 PM |
#22 |
| -
Even if the people of NYS (I amongst them) are against it. She couldn't |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Mar-28-06 02:47 PM |
#28 |
| -
She is smart enough to know she can't win as a peace candidate |
NNN0LHI |
Mar-28-06 02:40 PM |
#24 |
| -
What if the war is all ready lost? Eisenhower got elected |
shain from kane |
Mar-28-06 02:44 PM |
#27 |
| -
Let's see -- Nixon's secret plan to end the war in Viet Nam |
coalition_unwilling |
Mar-28-06 02:52 PM |
#32 |
| -
The argument was that no one could get elected running as |
shain from kane |
Mar-28-06 07:53 PM |
#65 |
| -
Sorry about that -- sloppy reading\reasoning on my part. Hillary's |
coalition_unwilling |
Mar-29-06 12:35 PM |
#70 |
| -
I heard that Cindy Sheehan met with Hillary and told her |
coalition_unwilling |
Mar-28-06 02:50 PM |
#30 |
| -
yes. |
GreenArrow |
Mar-28-06 02:51 PM |
#31 |
| -
She is "Pro-Hillary", nothing more. |
dicksteele |
Mar-28-06 02:52 PM |
#33 |
| -
A misunderstanding |
Lexingtonian |
Mar-28-06 03:34 PM |
#44 |
| -
HRC's game? no idea. her words are pretty clear: |
endarkenment |
Mar-28-06 03:39 PM |
#49 |
| -
"finishing this war with success and honor" |
Disturbed |
Mar-28-06 03:56 PM |
#55 |
| -
Excellent post. (n/t) |
oasis |
Mar-28-06 03:56 PM |
#56 |
| -
That's a good policy IF |
hughee99 |
Mar-28-06 04:23 PM |
#59 |
| -
Hillary's game is ....... |
Egnever |
Mar-28-06 10:50 PM |
#67 |
| -
Hell YES she is (prove me wrong)! |
Terran1212 |
Mar-28-06 05:32 PM |
#64 |
| -
My Answer is A Resounding Yes |
Al122 |
Mar-28-06 10:35 PM |
#66 |
| -
Hi Al122!! |
newyawker99 |
Mar-29-06 08:37 AM |
#68 |
| -
Of course, since she is a CORPORATIST. Where those campaign $$$ come from. |
WA98296 |
Mar-29-06 08:41 AM |
#69 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread