Reply #7: Good. Here is the one i wrote that will be in the Sacramento Bee

[Taguba]

we here in Sac only have a 200 word limit which blows...they already sent me a reply that it will be published within 10 days. I am sure some freeper nutballs will be calling my house and threatening me.


I guess a 14 year old rape or incest victim carrying a baby for nine
months and giving birth to a constant reminder of the violent, life
changing act, does not harm the mother, in the view of the South
Dakota legislature.
I find it curious how the penalty is only given to the Doctor who
performs the abortion. Why isn't the party of life putting a penalty
on the distraught 14-year-old rape/incest victim? She is the one
bringing the "victim" to the doctor for the "murder"; she plans the
"crime" and lets the "crime" happen. The law makes that pre-meditated
murder with special circumstances. We all know the penalty for that
crime if you are a poor minority that has been abandoned by his
family, school, and government.
If the S.D. legislature had any conviction to their nonsense, they
would make it a crime for the mother too. They are only in it for
votes and could care less about the health of the mother or the
futures of these unwanted kids.
The GOP will fight to the death for a baby until he/she passes the
birth canal. Then the lazy, uneducated, entitlement loving bastards
are on their own.